G -> 2.3-3.1 Flashcards
who’s does better because of movement via RUM?
- migrants earn regular wage
- more advanced/ preventative healthcare measures viable than rural areas
- access to secondary/ tertiary education, eg in Nairobi (for women and minority groups)
- LGBT migrants may find more acceptance, but persecution continues, eg, Ugandan cities
- business gain workers who are willing to do unpopular jobs - keeps wages/ costs low
who does worse because of movement via RUM?
- new arrivals increase overcrowding and pressure on services
- those already living in the city - migrants may work for lower pay, and also higher demand for housing means pricing will go up
- pressure on government to combat overcrowding with water, housing, sanitation, transport, education, etc
push factors for RUM
- poverty
- conflict
- natural disasters
- crop failures
pull factors for RUM
- jobs
- education
- healthcare
- safety
also can still send remittances back
what is the primary sector?
economic activity which extracts raw materials, eg oil or fishing
infrastructure in Karachi
- urban planning and service delivery have not kept pace with cities growth = city’s low liveability ranking
- no cohesive transportation policy, almost 1000 cars added to cities congested streets daily
what is katchi abadis?
unable to provide housing to large numbers of refugees, slips haded to them so they can stay on any vacant land, nearly 50% of residents live on unplanned communities.
total crop production in pakistan has fallen from rs 2.7 trillion in fy15 to
rs 2.6 trillion in fy16
- rural works may migrate to urban area given the change in economic and social conditions
informal sector in Karachi
- informal employs unto 70% of workforce
- crackdown operation against criminals in 2013 resulted in dramatically low crime rates
benefits for source country
- remittances received
- less unemployment
- wages rise as fewer workers available
- new job opportunities
- housing hospitals less crowded
costs for source county
- loss of skilled workers (brain drain)
- loss of tax revenue
- loss of culture
- younger population leaving, so population is older
costs for host country
- extra community policing and translation costs
- need for extra school places and health services in areas of concentrated immigration
- pressure on rented sector of housing members
benefits for host country
- filling of skills gaps and labour shortages
- migrants contribute to economy as consumers
- more tax paying workers to support population
what happened in 2004?
accession 8 added to EU so an influx of migration
define londongrad
a name for wealthy regions of London where Russian business owners have brought property for their children and families
do UK want Russian elite migrating and investing in London?
- Russian international investments in London is sizeable 27Bn
- Russia only account for 1% of UK financial services
- is there any need to impose sanctions on russia?
what do low wage eu migrant do
- are willing to work for lower wages and do unpopular jobs
- as a result wages will go down and they will take domestic jobs which could cause a social division
- also economically not good as there will be more leakages through remittances and less spending in circular domestic economy
what do Russian oligarchs do
- a lot of investment
- a lot of tax
= more revenue to the government
rio games stats
2 million tickets sold
170k spectators
- presents seriously disabled as glamorous, ambitious and capable rather than a victimised minority