Facial Skeletal Augmentation With Implants and Osseous Genioplasty Flashcards
The subcutanouse plane is typically preferred for implant
placement.
F The subperiosteal plane is typically preferred for implant
placement.
Incisions should be planned away from the implant pocket
T
Rigid fixation minimizes the risk ofinfection
Rigid fixation minimizes implant malposition and reduces
risk ofinfection.
Horizontal osteotomies should be placed at least 5 mm
caudal to the canines to avoid tooth root injury as well as to
reduce risk of mental nerve injury
T
Placement of intraoral incision should be I cm anterior
to the gingivolabial sulcus, allowing for proper wound
closure
T
preoperative evaluation
3D CT scanning, stereolithographic modeling, 3D printing posteroanterior and lateral cephalometric radiographs and panoramic x-rays
skeletal augmentation with autogenous bone can remodel, in time
affecting its size and shape.
T
Implant migration and adjacent bone erosion also tend to be lower in porous implants
T
Solid silicone implants offer several advantages
can be effortlessly carved to achieve a desired shape and size,
as well as be easily fixated with screws or sutures.
infection, although low regardless of the implant type, has been reported to be lower when silicone implants are used.
Implant placement is described in both supraperiosteal and subperiosteal planes
T
The subperiosteal pocket dissection is
preferred why?
The subperiosteal pocket dissection is
preferred as it involves a plane of dissection that is bloodless and safe
relative to surrounding neurovascular structures
A major advantage of screw fixation over the other methods
(e.g., sutures) relates to more accurate final contour because gaps
between host bone and the implant are eliminated
T
Most aesthetic facial augmentation occurs in the middle and lower
thirds ofthe face
T
Augmentation ofthe midface can be divided in four
major areas»_space;»
malar, submalar, paranasal, and infraorbital rim.
skeletal augmentation are equivalent to
soft-tissue augmentation and resuspension;
F skeletal augmentation should not be seen as equivalent to
soft-tissue augmentation and resuspension; these are two separate entities that when used appropriately can have a synergistic effect
Incision placement for insertion of malar implants can vary and
include the intraoral, coronal, or eyelid routes
T
Careful carving ofthe implant on its posterior surface and
rigid fixation minimize visibility and malposition
T
In patients with
a relatively normal occlusion, deficient midface projection can be corrected with facial implants
T
When properly placed, paranasal implants
can simulate the visual effect ofLeFort II advancement
F of LeFort I advancement
the upper gingivalbuccal sulcusincision
is made just lateral to the piriform aperture
T
When screw fixation is employed, care
should be taken to avoid the root ofthe canine
T
Compromise ofthe nasal
airway can occur ifimplants are positionedover the piriform aperture.
T
Augmentation of the infraorbital rim can decrease
the incidence of lower lid malposition by reversing the “negative”
vector
T
Better exposure ofthe midface skeleton can be obtained by incorporating an intraoral sulcus incision
T