Source, form, redaction etc. Flashcards

1
Q

Explain how interpreting the Gs from a historical perspective is a problem for scholars

A

They were written decades after JC died and in different languages to the one JC spoke in. Unlikely that they were written by eyewitnesses. Thus the texts are open to mistranslation, misinterpretation, source issues and theological bias.

Scholars are still unsure on who wrote them, when they were written and to what end

Scholars also don’t know where the Gs got their info from

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why are the sources that they used to gain knowledge so important in terms of the historicity and reliability of the Gs

A

Because none of the Gs are thought to have been written by actual eyewitnesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What have biblical scholars done after comparing the differences between the Gs

A

Come up with a number of theories as to how they were constructed and what these theories would reveal about the bias and intent of the writers should they be true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain the term exegesis

A

Comes from the Greek ‘to draw out’, refers to the detailed analysis and resultant interpretation of scripture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What will an exegesis of an NT passage involve

A

Will include reference to the context in which it was written, as well as consideration of the symbolism within the text with regard to the readership the writer was writing for. This will enable a scholar to get a full understanding of the passage, which will inform further study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain the Synoptic Problem

A

Refers to the interrelated nature of the first three Gs. The same stories and parables appear in all three, but each author has a slightly different theological slant or reading of the parable, for instance. The relationship between them is clear while John is more divergent

Their structure is largely the same and they share alot of parables and miracles. Why is this the case?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why do some scholars see the synoptics as being more historically accurate

A

Because if a story appears multiple times this would seem to make it more likely that it actually happened

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Trying to solve the synoptic problem leads to source criticism. What is source criticism

A

Seeks to identify and detail the sources used by an author of a text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does Raymond Brown use SC to argue for the Marcan priority

A

He says that approximately 80% of Marcan content is reproduced in Matthew and 65% in Luke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why is the theory of Marcan priority useful for scholars if true

A

It displays through the changes made by the writers of Matthew and Luke what their theological biases and intentions were when writing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Make the case for the Marcan priority being true

A

The language is more plain and straightforward than Matthew and Luke. This suggests that Mark is earlier and provided the basics which were then eleborated on by Matthew and Luke.

It has been observed that the difference between Matthew/Luke and Mark can be pointed to as having likely roots in historical/political contexts, while the core structure of the gospels remain the same. For instance, both Gs appear to have taken the opening genealogy from Mark and changed it for their own ends

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the purpose of SC

A

By looking at texts from the time which are alternative to the Synoptics that could potentially have been used as sources for the sayings or stories within the synoptics, scholars can gain knowledge and form theories regarding why the gospels were written

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How is the Synoptic problem and example of SC

A

Because it deals with the search for the source of these texts via examining their interrelated nature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why can SC be seen as having its basis in the gospels themselves

A

Luke 1:1-4 - Talks about how many have tried to draw up an account of JC’s life. The writer himself says that he has examined these sources and will try and write up an orderly account. From this we know that there were other texts and sources referring to JC at the time Luke was written and the L himself referred to them when writing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain FC

A

Attempts to classify and trace parts of scripture back to their original oral/written form, with the aim of discovering the original form of that part and the historical context from which it arose. Key term is German ‘sitz im leben’ meaning ‘in the situation of the story’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Explain RC

A

The study of how the texts of the bible were arranged, edited or changed from the original by those who compiled the now accepyed order and canon. By comparing the differences between the synoptics, we can find out about the purposes and ideas of those redacting the texts. Focuses on how the author of a text may have edited it to suit their theological goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What two groups is RC split into?

A

Higher and lower RC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is higher RC

A

The quest to find out to what extent to text is genuine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is lower RC

A

The quest towards finding the original wording used to write the text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the most common explanation for the Synoptic Problem

A

The two source theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Explain the two source theory

A

Many scholars believe the interrelated nature of the synoptics were caused by the consultation of two sources during the writing of Matthew and Luke. The core events of the texts are incredibly similar, as is the chronological structure of the narrative

These sources are widely believed to be Mark (Marcan Priority) and a hypothetical source termed Q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Explain what this hypothetical Q source is

A

Seen as a now lost logica text composed of the sayings and actions of JC without a narrative structure. Source to which pieces of both Matthew and Luke are attributed that are not in Mark, but are found in both gospels. The term Q is shorthand and refers to the German word quelle, meaning source

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Who is responsible for the most widely accepted form of Q theory

A

BH Streeter

25
Q

What does his theory state

A

Posits that it was written in Koine Greek, a distinctly hellenistic dialect which is characteristic of the time period in which JC lived and the gospels were written

26
Q

What is a less popular theory regarding Q

A

That it could be considered to be a collection of multiple sources rather than a single source, which fits in with Luke’s account of having consulted multiple sources and done his research before writing the gospel

27
Q

Give an example of a scholar who has argued against Q

A

M Farrer

28
Q

In what work does he do this

A

On Dispensing with Q

29
Q

On what grounds does he reject Q

A

Makes the case for the similarities within the gospels having basis in interconnected use - this means that he believes that the reasons for similarities lies solely with Marcan priority, or intertextual access by gospel writers

30
Q

What does the theory of Marcan priority state

A

That Mark was written first and was known to Matthew and Luke and so was used a source for these gospels

31
Q

How does dating support the Marcan priority

A

Mark is thought to have been written around 60-65 CE where as Matthew and Luke are dated in the 70s and 80s

32
Q

List some of the content from Matthew and Luke that is thought to have been taken from Q

A

The tempting of JC by Satan three times

The Lord’s Prayer

The use of a Mustard Seed as an analogy of faith

33
Q

What is the Griesbach hypothesis

A

Another two source theory which is less popular than the Marcan Priority. Flips the idea of the Marcan Priority on its head, arguing that Matthew was written first, followed by Luke, with these two texts then being used to write Mark. The hypothesis is that the commonality was created by the writer of Mark finding the common themes and events in Matthew and Luke and choosing to included these

34
Q

What is the proto gospel theory

A

Explores the potential of hypothetical early gospels from which content was taken and used to compile the canonical gospels. Hypothesises that these proto gospels informed the synoptics but not John

35
Q

Give some examples of gospels that are not canonised

A

The Gospel of Thomas and the Gospel of Peter. They have a tendency to include more mysticism and include an instance of the physical cross speaking during the crucifixion

36
Q

What is the Gospel of Thomas

A

A collection of 114 sayings of Jesus with no narrative context

37
Q

Why is it unlikely that it was used as a source

A

It is thought to have post dated the synoptics. It references the bar kokhba revolt, which has led scholars to date the text to after 140 CE

38
Q

What does the less popular 4 source hypothesis propose

A

Refers to the idea that there are four sources for these gospels, namely Mark, Q and two other special sources specific to Matthew (special Matthew) and Luke (special Luke). These last two sources are hypothetical and would have been lost if they ever existed. Posits that M would not have been aware of special L and vice versa

39
Q

What is the 4 source hypothesis supposed to account for

A

Supposed to account for material that is found only in Matthew or LUke

40
Q

Who put it forward

A

Biblical scholar BH Streeter

41
Q

He assigned the origins of Q, special L and special M based on the tone and allusions found within them

A

Q - Anthioch

M - Jerusalem

L - Caesarea

42
Q

Why is the fact that everything we know about Jesus was written after his crucifixion significant

A

Because the gospels and epistles were written by people who believed Jesus had been resurrected. This changed their view of him from from whatever it was while he was performing his ministry

43
Q

Why didn’t early Christians write down what they had witnessed

A

Because they believed the end of the world was imminent

44
Q

Why are the Pauline epistles a poor source for identifying the historical Jesus

A

He never knew Jesus and outlines only the most basic details of his life

45
Q

Why were the gospels eventually written

A

They were written when the generation of Christians who knew Jesus personally were beginning to die. They realised that they would need a record of Jesus to pass onto future generations of Christians who had not known Jesus - possibly Christians who had never been to Galilee or Judea and knew little about Judaism.

However, they are not just biographies of Jesus, they were written to pass on beliefs about Jesus: that he is the messiah, the SoG and the saviour of the world

46
Q

What is the traditional explanation for who wrote the gospels

A

That they were written independently by people personally close to Jesus

Matthew and John were written by actual disciples, Matthew Levi the tax collector and JSZ, Matthew was perhaps written in antioch were there was a large Jewish pop and John perhaps in Ephesus (both of which are in modern Turkey)

Mark was written by the secretary of Jesus chief disciple, Peter, since Peter was executed in Rome this is thought to have been written there

Luke was written by Paul’s travelling companion, a Greek doctor and Christian convert who met with Peter and the other disciples. It is thought to have been written in Greece, where Paul founded his churches

47
Q

When were the gospels traditionally said to have been written

A

In the 60s CE, before the Jewish Revolt of 67-73 and the destruction of the temple, which Jesus is said to have predicted

48
Q

What do modern scholars think about this

A

Modern scholarship is secular and does not assume that miracles such as Jesus predicting the temple destruction can occur. They date the gospels to after the Jewish revolt, which explains why Jesus can predict the temple destruction - as it was actually in the past when the gospels were written

49
Q

Explain the reasoning behind why scholars date Mark to be somewhere between 65-70 AD

A

Mark emphasised that Christians should expect persecution by the Jewish leaders as well as ‘governors and kings’ (Mark 13:9) and this probably refers to Christians being blamed for the fire in Rome in 64 CE. There are several prophecies in Mark about the temple being destroyed, but the author doesn’t seem to know that this actually happened, which would date Mark no later than 70 CE

50
Q

Why can we conclude that Mark was probably written for gentile christians rather than jewish christians

A

As Mark explains Jewish customs for his readers in verses like 7: 3-4

51
Q

Why was Matthew presumed to have been the first gospel

A

It is a very Jewish gospel: it does not explain Jewish customs, it uses OT proof texts to prove that Jesus is the messiah and shows a good knowledge of 1st century Palestine and respect for the Jewish Law (%: 18-19)

52
Q

Why is Matthew thought to have come from Antioch

A

Because he refers to Jesus as being famous ‘throughout all Syria’ (4: 24), which means it was probably written for a group of Jewish Christians who escaped the destruction of the Jewish War and moved to Syria, probably to Antioch which had a large community of Jewish Christians

53
Q

Why can we dispute the idea that it was written by Matthew the tax collector

A

Because the author does not identify himself as Matthew or write as if he is an eyewitness to the events in Jesus life

54
Q

What is considered to have been the final of the Synoptics to have been written

A

Luke

55
Q

Who does it claim to be written by in 1: 1-4

A

Not an eyewitness account but instead a report gathered from people who were eyewitnesses

56
Q

Describe this gospel

A

Written in a good standard of Greek for an educated audience but has only a hazy understanding of the geography of Palestine. Writes about some specific details of the Roman seige of Jerusalem in 70 CE and so is dated to after this date. Strong focus on the relevance of Christianity to the gentiles and on Jesus’ moral teachings. Tries to present Jesus as a philosopher figure - someone the Roman Empire would find respectable and non threatening

57
Q

Why is John considered to be the latest gospel

A

Describes Jesus’ enemies as ‘the Jews’ and seems to come from a time where Christians were ceasing to view themselves as Jewish; it has a high christology and presents Jesus as the incarnated Logos. Refers to Christians being expelled from synagogues, which took place in the 80s and 90s. Has a backward looking style that refers to the events in Jesus life as having happened some time ago. However it has a much more accurate knowledge of the geography of pre-70 CR Jerusalem than the other gospels. This means that some parts may go back to original eyewitnesses

58
Q

Explain the significance of P52

A

The oldest example of gospel yet discovered is the Rylands Library Papyrus P52. It contains a fragment from John 18 and has been dated to the early 2nd century CE

59
Q
A