flight deck management Flashcards
Advantages of co-operation
redundancy
synergy (mutual reinforcement, distribution of responsibilities)
clarifification of action
co-action means
when you work in parallel towards same goal
working in groups
have to work in ‘concert’ with others.
may do thing differently with people than alone
groups require ‘high synergy/copoeration’
Negatives of being in a group
Conformity:
pressure to confirm and to go along with a group decision even if it’s wrong
risky shift
possibly make riskier decisions when you have more people in a group who are risk takers
**Disagreements on decision **
Due to having a mix of leaders, non confrontational / conflic avoiders
compliance
a decion might be accepted if a greater one has been denied before or a lesser one has been accepted before
Cohesion
can be an advantage but ‘too much’ group thinking is negative - ie too much unconscious support from members.
Efficient crew coordination required
co-opertion and communication
SOPs
CRM training
Line Orient Flight training
how to improve decision making
avoid personal judgement. Be logical and objective
don’t change your mind to ‘confirm’ or to avoid ‘conflict’. Support the decision on which you agree.
if a decision is made, accept it unless it causes a hazard
avoid conflict causing techniques like ‘majority votes’ or middle course strategies
view difference of opinions as helpful
definition of a leadership
behaviour the moves a group to closer to attaining a goal whilst winning their loyalty, confidence, respect and willing coperation.
taking people where they would not have gone on their own
leader’s characteristics
ability to influence the thoughts and behaviours of others
pursuasive
understands the goals and desires of aothers
builds successful relationships with teams
see the big picture, people, empowerment and opportunity
expect outperformance
display emotional resolve
control their action/thinking before acting/accepts responsibility
regulate info flow
directing activities
leadership and authority
leadership (acquired) and authority (assigned) should be balanced
by
assertiveness
Authority gradients
situations that arise between pilots and copilots where they don’t communicate in stressful situations if there is a significance in their perceived expertese, authority level, experience…
synergetic
autocratic
self centered
laissey faire
autocratic cockpit
when captain imposes decisions without consultation
ignores opinion of others
doesn’t delegate and ends up being overloaded
comments don’t teach others anything
Occurs when:
there is a technical skill gap between pilot & copilot
under-confident pilot uses authority / aggressiveness to hide weakness
co-pilot is weak or self effacing whilst capaitain is strong charactered.
self centered cockpit
each member does their own thing without thelling the other, because they assume others already know.
a frequent result is a co pilot feels ignored and may disengage, show delayed response or aggression
laissez faire
when captain is passive and allows others to make decisions with a major** risk of ‘investion of authority’**
happens when:
* crew is competent
* leadership role gets filled by another crew member
* crew do their own thing without keeping other informed
synergistic cockpit
decisions taken by captain with the ‘help of other crew’
democtratic / co operative leadership
clarifies and uses reason to resolve conflict
helps team improve their skills and assertiveness
it’s a ‘happy medium’ between autocratic and laissez fair cockpits
but the type of leadership is NOT FIXED - captain can be more authoritative or laiisez fair depeding on the situation.
Meaning of Multi-Crew
Term means more than one person flying the aircraft
this is nto about technical knowledge
they do so as a team working together towards one task
reduce workload by sharing tasks
allow better quality decision making (actions are discussed)
better error management and situation awareness