F.18 Literature analysis Flashcards

1
Q

What is the primary requirement of Australian health informatics competency F.18?

A

Health informaticians appraise current scientific literature for its contribution to evidence-informed digital health practice

(AIDH, 2022)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does appraising current scientific literature involve?

A

Objectively reviewing a work and reaching conclusions about its credibility and applicability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are important considerations when critiquing literature?

A
  • Critiquing for the right reasons and with integrity
  • Assessing the source
  • Assessing the author’s qualifications
  • Methodology
  • Assessing applicability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What should be included in critiquing for the right reasons?

A
  • Advancing knowledge by validating, invalidating, extending, reframing, and applying
  • Avoiding territoriality and suppression of knowledge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why is it important to recognize that all perspectives are value-laden?

A

To enable review with an open mind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What factors should be assessed regarding the source of literature?

A
  • Peer-reviewed status
  • Funding sources
  • Relevance of the originating context
  • Publication date
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What qualifications of authors should be appraised?

A
  • Knowledge
  • Skill
  • Experience
  • Understanding of motivations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What aspects should be critiqued in methodology?

A
  • Constraints or biases of the method
  • Suitability and effectiveness of the methodology
  • Articulation of hypotheses
  • Ethical considerations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What should be assessed regarding the results or positions presented?

A
  • Logical flow from the work
  • Strength of association
  • Consistency with similar works
  • Identification of limitations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does assessing applicability involve?

A
  • Comparing scenarios of conclusions with potential application
  • Compatibility of values and interests
  • Identifying knowns and unknowns
  • Recognizing limitations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is publication bias?

A

The tendency for studies submitted for publication to contain more positive results than those that are not published.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

True or False: Absence of evidence is evidence of absence.

A

False.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What should be questioned regarding expert advice?

A

Whether it is based on the best evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly