RPA endo Flashcards
Diagnosis of diabetes in haemoglobinopathies
OGTT
what virus is proven to cause T1DM
congenital rubella unproven: coxackie, rotavirus, mumps, reovirus, herpes, cows’ milk
genetics of T1DM - what chromosome is involved
chromosome 6
what MHC is involved in beta cell destruction
MHC II - on antigen presenting cells
what HLA is protective of T1DM
DR2 is protective
what HLA is a risk factor of T1DM
DR3 and DR4 are expressed in 95% of white patients with Type 1 diabetes
does the mother or father confer higher risk for T1DM
father is 6.1% risk mother is 2.1% risk
what antibodies are implicated in T1DM
anti GAD anti IA2 zinc transporter 8 first 2 more clinically important
which autoantibody is most important for the development of T1DM
anti GAD
screening for T1DM - what tests to do
HLA DR3/DR4 nmeasure anti GAD and anti IA2 ab insulin secreting potential
pathogenesis of T2DM
insulin resistance but also relative insulin deficiency due to defect glucorecognition
does the mother or father confer higher risk for T2DM
mothers intrauterine environment is important for the development of type 2 DM
what type of genes are affected in T2DM
majority relate to beta cell function loss only a small inter related to insulin resistance
most important gene for T2DM
TCF7L2 - mechanism unknown
MODY genetics
autosomal dominant single gene defects MODY1-5 enzyme defect - HNF-4alpha, glucokinase (mild hyperglycaemia), HNF-1alpha (very sensitive to sulphonylureas), IPF-1
clinical features MODY
onset <25 for at least another family member correction of fasting hyperglycaemia for at least 2 years without insulin no ketotic events impaired insulin secretion
HNF-1alpha characteristics
MODY enzyme defect very sensitive to sulphonylureas
glucokinase clinical significance
MODY enzyme defect mild hyperglycaemia usually does not require treatment
impaired glucose tolerance prevention for diabetes
lifestyle - diet, exercise +/- weight loss effects seen without weight loss rosiglitazone reduced new DM by >60% small increase in heart failure however practically lifestyle
sulfonylurea MOA, adverse effects
stimulates release insulin from the beta cells may have weight gain hypoglycaemia is possible gliceride preferred as metabolites not active and lower risk of hypo CVS impact is neutral on latest study
what allergies should avoid for sulfonylureas
sulfur allergies
biguanides MOA and aderse effects
increases insulin action decrease hepatic gluconeogenesis does not cause hypos by itself but can potential hypos in combination with other things lactic acidosis - rare GI side effects start low and go slow
metformin eGFR cut off
<30
metformin contradindications
liver damage (pregnancy) nephropathy eGFR <30
acarbose MOA and adverse effects
decrease HbA1c by 0.5% at most (very weak agent) AE: flatuence and diarrhoea in 80%! malabsorption
TZD - thiazolidinediones
Activates PPAR_gamma nucleus receptor central to insulin action Tosiglitazone + pioglitazone AE: weight gain, fluid retention/CCF, ?cardiac disease (rose), fractures, ?bladder cancer (pio)
incretic mimetics
GIT hormones - GLP-1, GIP GLP-1 analog - exenatides, dulagutide (both weekly injections)
what does incretin and GLP1 do
increase insulin release and inhibit glucagon to lower blood glucose
what does DPP-4 do
inactivates GLP-1 (so DPP-4 inhibitors increase endogenous GLP-1)
GLP-1 analog advantages
potent weight loss ++ low risk of hypos dual/tripe therapy CV outcome studies
GLP1 A
expensive injection nausea ++
DPP-4 inhibitors
gliptins
DPP-4 advantages
tablet otherwise similar to GLP1
DPP-4 AE
depends on endogenous production of GLP-1 which is already decreased in T2DM not as potent as GLP-1 no weight loss (As weaker) neutral CV outcome studies
what has positive CVS outcome studies
SGLT-2 and GLP-1
SGLT-2 transported
transports 90% of glucose out of the tubular lumen
pros SGLT-2
relatively potent 0.5-1% HbA1c reduction weight loss lowers BP
cons SGLT-2
genital fungal infections euglycaemia DKA
SGLT2 eGFR cut off
<45
when does SGLT2 need to be stopped before surgery..procedure or fasting
2-3 days prior
lispro insulin, aspart, glulisine vs actrapid
absorbed faster than act rapid
what is the next step if someone has good BSL at bedtime but wakes up with high pre breakfast BSL
measure BSL at 3am to see whether it’s dawn phenomenon or somogyi effect to see whether it’s too little insulin (dawn) or too much (somogyi) causing rebound hyperglycaemia after 3am hypo
HbA1C aim T1DM
6.5-7
tighter control and weight in T2DM
tighter control = more weight gain
good glucose control and micro and macrovascular in T2DM
less micro vascular and maybe macrovascular EDIC showed reduced in major cardiovascular events in group that had initial good HbA1C control (2 groups of good and poor HbA1C but long term both groups had good glucose control but initial good control group early on) so macrovascular outcomes may only be apparent after many years
intense glucose control in T2DM
ACCORD study short term outcomes aimed for 6% and lower excessive mortality now we aim for 7% in cardiac disease
good glucose control and macrovascular outcomes
improves macrovascular but over long term and need initial good control
HBA1C aims T2DM no CV + metformin
<6%
glitazone in CVS
rosiglitazone worsen lipids pioglitazone possibly decreases cardiac outcomes however both should not be used oedema
gliptin (DPP4) on CVS
sitaglipin does not increase HF saxagliptin does increase hospitalisation for HF
empagliflozin/dapagliflozin none endo effects
3 point MACE heart failure reduced renal composite outcomes note empa has trend towards increased stroke
significance of dulagltide for CVS
other studies had populations w established CVS disease the rewind study of dulaglutide included 69% without baseline CV disease so it is showing the dulaglutide as PRIMARY prevention
BP lowering DM agents
SGLT2s and GLP1
insulinoma testing
prolonged fast when the person gets a hypo, simultaneous c peptide,, insulin insulinoma does not produce hypoglycaemia w OGTT
impaired glucose tolerance hypoglycaemia
high-isa C-peptide rapid reactive/postprandial hypoglycaemia
c peptide in sulfnoyureas hypoglycaemia
high c-peptide
diabetes and VGEF
vgef is the bad guy in pathogenesis in retinopathy
treatment of retinopathy
anti-VGEF intravitreal
type 2 DM vs type 1 DM - proteinuria and prevention of renal progression
Type 2 DM - ARB Type 1 DM - ACE I
bp targets in DM
accord study - no difference SBP 120-140 so aim now 140/80 if microalbuminuria; 140/90 no microalbuminuria