Nov 14 Flashcards
qualitative study examining Ps in DISSOLUTION CONSIDERATION phase setup
mostly dating couples
some married/common law
focus on Ps CURRENTLY contemplating breakups (this helps mitigate memory biases)
what are some reasons for wanting to STAY/LEAVE current partner?
qualitative study examining Ps in DISSOLUTION CONSIDERATION phase results
generated 27 distinct reasons for staying
23 for leaving
reasons for wanting to STAY in relationship
(from most to least common)
- emotional intimacy
- emotional investment
- family duty
desirable partner personality traits, enjoyment, emotional security, physical intimacy, financial benefits, compatibility, concern for partner, optimism, validation
reasons for wanting to LEAVE relationship
(from most to least common)
- partner flaws
- breach of trust
- partner withdrawal
external reasons (ie. relocation), physical distance, conflict, incompatibility, emotional distance, lack of validation, lack of financial benefits, lack of enjoyment
what is common when partners are deciding whether to stay or leave?
AMBIVALENCE
49% report higher-than-midpoint STAY and LEAVE motivation
ambivalence about stay/leave is particularly pronounced for…
anxiously attached individuals
strong desire for relationship & reliance on partner for validation
mixed with heightened sensitivity to negativity within relationship
relationship ambivalence associated with…
- NEG HEALTH OUTCOMES (ie. coronary heart disease)
- GREATER PHYSIOLOGICAL AROUSAL
- MORE NEG EMOTIONS
meta analysis of non-marital breakups SETUP
Q = what factors predict breakups?
meta analysis of 137 longitudinal studies, conducted over 30 years, N = 37,700
studies included if they:
- were LONGITUDINAL
- assessed 1+ relevant predictors
- assessed RELATIONSHIP STABILITY at a later time
meta analysis of non-marital breakups LARGE EFFECT PREDICTORS
a) positive illusions
b) commitment
c) love
meta analysis of non-marital breakups MODERATE EFFECT PREDICTORS
a) self-other overlap
b) trust
c) closeness
d) quality of alternatives
e) investment
f) satisfaction
g) network support
meta analysis of non-marital breakups SMALL EFFECTS
a) relationship duration
b) avoidant attachment (leave)
c) conflict
d) anxious attachment (leave)
e) destiny beliefs
f) agreeableness
meta analysis of non-marital breakups EFFECT PATTERN
INDIVIDUAL level factors like ATTACHMENT STYLE & BIG 5 personality traits
showed relatively SMALL or NULL effects
RELATIONSHIP-level factors show STRONGER effects
although people in relationships (and often, researchers) tend to focus on INDIVIDUAL & RELATIONAL factors…
relationships exist in BROADER CONTEXT
individual, relational and external context factors INTERACT in complex ways to shape BREAKUP RISK
model that takes into account complex stay/leave factors
vulnerability-stress-adaptation (VSA) model of marriage
considers individual, relational and external context factors
vulnerability-stress-adaptation model (VSA)
- enduring Vulnerabilities
- Stressful events
- Adaptive processes
VSA: enduring vulnerabilities examples
adverse experiences in family of origin
insecure attachment
neuroticism
impulsivity
low education levels
VSA: stressful events examples
unemployment
life transitions
illness
childbirth
VSA: adaptive processes
ways in which couples deal with challenges/conflict
ie. communication styles, stress management
VSA: reciprocal relationship between…
adaptive processes and marital quality
ie. low marital quality = less motivated to engage in adaptive processes
ie. less adaptive processes = lower marital quality
stress
set of physiological, emotional, cognitive changes in response to a demanding challenge in the environment (a stressor)
stress spillover
many of the stressors couples face are EXTERNAL to their relationship
ie. financial strain, debt, high workloads
but these have the power to AFFECT THE RELATIONSHIP
stress drives attentional…
shift to what is SALIENT in the environment
heightens SENSITIVITY to THREAT
^ ie. like an insensitive remark made by spouse
INTERFERES with more complex forms of cognitive processing
^ ie. like taking contextual factors into account
stress impedes…
ACCOMMODATION
ie. physiological arousal during marital discussion is associated with increased NEGATIVE RECIPROCITY
studies of how stress impedes accommodation
- dairy study - negative marital interactions more likely to be reported on days that have been stressful
^ also more likely on weekdays vs weekends
- air traffic controller study - higher workload predicts greater withdrawal at home
- wives more likely to make blame attributions for negative partner behaviour when under stress
enduring vulnerabilities affect both…
- propensity to EXPERIENCE stress (path C)
- ability to COPE with stress (path b)
examples of how enduring vulnerabilities affect both propensity to EXPERIENCE stress and ability to COPE with stress
- parental discord & divorce associated with lower accomplishment (path C) as well as poorer social skills as adults (path B)
- individuals high in negative affectivity (ie. neuroticism) more likely to appraise situations as stressful, and make more negative attributions for partner behaviour
couples who are more supportive & have stronger coping skills are not as…
not as negatively impacted by stressful events
may even experience boosts to relationship satisfaction after stressful events
disapproval from couple’s social network…
may place ADDITIONAL STRAIN on relationships
^ implications for couples in same-sex relationships (although no evidence that same-sex relationships are less satisfying despite external stressors)
having supportive social network may be especially important when facing other difficulties (ie. financial strain)
although disapproval of relationship from social network may place added strain on relationships…
determinants of martial quality and stability are MULTIFACTORIAL
- individual & relational factors influence adjustment
historical trends in divorce in the US
increased since mid-1930s
appears to be slowing down, but 50% of US marriages will end in separation
changes in expectations of marriage quote
“today, we turn to one person to provide what an entire village once did: a sense of grounding, meaning and continuity. at the same time, we expect our committed relationships to be romantic as well as emotionally and sexually fulfilling. is it any wonder that so many relationships crumble under the weight of it all?”
trends in “very happily” married people
consistently decreasing
maybe marriages aren’t getting objectively worse, but maybe the gap between our expectations and outcomes is widening