Lecture 7: The Acquisition of Expert Performance Flashcards
expert performance
Consistently superior perforamnce on a set of representative tasks for the domain that can be administered to any subject
the traditional view of expert performance
“Giftedness for a given activity is necessary to attain the highest level of performance in that activity.”
the most common view of expert performance
performance = ability x effort
Howard Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligence
argued there are 7 kinds of intelligence:
- linguistic-verbal
- logical mathematical
- spatial
- muscial
- bodily kinaesthetic
- interpersonal
- intrapersonal
linguistic-verbal intelligence
has to do with writing and reading
Ex. creative writers
logical-mathematical intelligence
has to do with mathematical and logical skills
Ex, engineers
spatial intelligence
focuses on abstract problem-solving skills
Ex. architects
musical intelligence
involves listening to, signing, and making music accurately
Ex. musicians
bodily kinaesthetic intelligence
focuses on the coordination of one’s bodily movements
Ex. athletes
interpersonal intelligence
involves understanding other people and how they differ
Ex. managers, teachers
intrapersonal intelligence
has to do with being able to use your knowledge of yourself and your experiences to understand others
Ex. writers
Howard Gardner’s point of view
- Gardner argues that there is a biological, largely genetic-based capacity that allows us to develop these skills
- He argues that we should spend more time helping children to identify their natural competencies and gifts and cultivate those.
- There are hundreds of ways to succeed, and many different abilities that will help you get there
Gardner’s ways of measuring intelligence
- Gardner developed ways of measuring various kinds of intelligence
- Ex. observing the types of things that young children like to play with, observing how children play with each other to measure interpersonal intelligence
Gardner on the correlates of intelligence
- Gardner found that types of intelligence were not correlated with each other
- This provides support for different types of intelligence
evidence for the talent view
- The performance of prodigies (children who acquire expert levels of performance at a very young age)
- The performance of savants (individuals without normal intelligence but who display very unusual abilities that other people do not have
- Seemingly superior basic abilities that predestine one for success in a certain domain (ex. Absolute pitch in music and the spatial memory of chess players)
what makes children prodigies?
- Most prodigies don’t show great talent at a young age: they show incredible interest and a willingness to learn
- Prodigies are raised in an environment that fosters success
- Their parents are also visionary and highly encourage their children to pursue their goals
absolute pitch and child prodigies
- The early ability of musicians is often reflected in absolute pitch
- But 1/100 Asian people have absolute pitch because their languages are tonal
- If you train a child in piano at a young enough age, they are more likely to develop it
- So, absolute pitch isn’t actually that rare in musically-trained Asian children
child prodigies and future success
Being identified as a prodigy doesn’t predict future success
how did Tiger Woods become a prodigy?
- Early exposure
- Extensive training
- Involved parents
- Keen interest
- High self-control
prodigies
children who acquire expert levels of performance at a very young age
savants
individuals without normal intelligence but who display very unusual abilities that other people do not have
the performance of savants
We could all learn most of the things savants do if we had the same kind of obsessive focus
superior basic abilities
- Absolute pitch perception among musicians
- Visual-spatial memory of chess players
evidence against basic abilities as a prerequisite
- Failure to find basic abilities that predict later expertise
- Failure to find experts with less than 10 years of training
Simon & Chase, 1973 study of chess masters
- Expert chess players only have an advantage against rookies if the chessboard layout is meaningful
- Demonstrates that they have an efficient mental representation of the chessboard that allows them to succeed
Ericsson & Charness’ conclusion
Even for the most successful individuals, the major domains of expertise are sufficiently complex that mastery of them requires approximately 10 years of essentially full-time preparation, which corresponds to several thousands of hours of practice (3000 hours for good amateur players)
what is the key to develop expertise in a domain?
- The traditional view that successful individuals have special innate abilities and basic capacities is not consistent with the evidence
- Differences between expert and less accomplished performers instead reflect acquired knowledge and skills or physiological adaptations that result from training