Kohlberg (classic study) Flashcards

1
Q

Moral development

A

How children begin to construct a system of beliefs by cognitive development and accepting rules + attitudes which determines right or wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Previous theories of moral development

A

Psychodynamic perspective (Freud)
Behaviourist perspective
Jean Piaget

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Jean Piaget perspective on moral development

A

Moral thinking is in 2 stages:
Heteronomous stage where children don’t consider intention but only outcome if action is bad/good
Autonomous which takes into account another person’s perspective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Kohlberg’s inspiration from Jean Piaget

A

Agreed there were stages to moral development and was a developmental process as cognitive reasoning improved in children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Aim of Kohlberg’s study

A

To investigate the moral development in children to provide evidence for his theory in moral development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What type of research method was this?

A

Self report study in the series of semi structured interviews

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sample used

A

First 725were boys sampled from Chicago between 10-16 who over course of 12 year study were 22-28
Other boys studied from different countries later

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

procedure step 1

A

Kohlberg interviewed each participant and presented them with philosophical moral dilemmas eg Heinz dilemma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What themes were used in kohlbergs questions in his interviews?

A

Questions about the value of human life
Questions about duty to not lie and keep promises
Questions about not stealing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Procedure step 2

A

Kohlberg judged boys responses to identify what moral thinking they were showing and what stage in development they were at

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Procedure step 3

A

Over 12 year intervals every 3 years, Kohlberg follows up the boys to interview them again with more hypothetical moral dilemmas
To judge their progression through his stages of moral development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Longitudinal study

A

A study which follows up participants over a long period, which Kohlberg did for 12 years in 3 year intervals following up the same boys to ask them Philosophical moral dilemmas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Procedure step 4

A

Kohlberg travelled to different countries to interview boys and determine their place in his stages of moral development theory
In order to show his model wasn’t cultural specific

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cross cultural study

A

A study in which someone collects data from other cultures around the world in order to measure the differences/similarities in behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What countries did Kohlberg collect data from in his cross cultural study?

A

Malaysia
Taiwan
UK
Mexico
Turkey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the main outline of kohlberg’s theory on moral development?

A

There are 3 levels: level 1, 2 and 3
And each level is composed of 2 stages
(So 6 stages in total)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What moral aspects was each stage in his theory concerned about?

A

The motivation to obey certain rules (what someone’s moral reasoning to do so is)
The value of human life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Level 1 of his theory on moral reasoning

A

Pre conventional
Stage 1
Stage 2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Stage 1 of his theory name

A

Obedience and punishment orientation

20
Q

Stage 1 of his theory of moral reasoning development

A

Obedient and follows rules set by cultural norms to avoid punishment (so may break rules if punishment might not happen)
And value of human life is based on someone’s social status or physical attributes

21
Q

Stage 2 of his theory name

A

Self interest orientation

22
Q

Stage 2 of his theory of moral reasoning development

A

The reasoning is based on what the person can gain or get in return
The value of human life is linked to satisfying the possessor and other people’s needs eg if wife died then their family wouldn’t have someone to cook for them etc

23
Q

Level 2 of his theory on moral reasoning development

A

Conventional
Stage 3
Stage 4

24
Q

Stage 3 of his theory name

A

Good girl/boy orientation

25
Stage 3 of his theory on moral reasoning development
The morality is based on approval of other people and what everyone else thinks (conformity to expectations) So the value of human life is based on affection of other people to its possessor
26
Stage 4 of his theory name
Authority and social order orientation
27
Stage 4 of his theory on moral development reasoning
Moral reasoning based on maintaining social order in society by following laws The value of human life is universal (based on religious idea or laws) but not autonomous because it is dependent on this
28
Level 3 of his theory on development of moral reasoning
Post conventional Stage 5 Stage 6
29
Stage 5 of his theory name
Social contract orientation
30
Stage 5 of his theory on moral reasoning development
Does what is right based on law and personal values and opinions thus changeable compared to stage 4 Value of human life is a universal human right but also concern for welfare of others
31
Stage 6 of his theory name
Universal ethical principles orientation
32
Stage 6 of his theory on moral reasoning development
Does what is right to avoid self condemnation for universal human rights of justice, equality, reciprocity and respect So every human life value is absolute determined by universe even if no one or themself values it
33
How does stage 6 differ from the rest on value of human life?
The definition of human life is centrally valuable to all and has no dependence on authority or other people
34
Conclusion Kohlberg made from his research about his own theory (in terms of invariance)
All people progress through the stages 1 at a time but they are invariant so no steps are skipped (but speed they are passed through can vary, this is affected by social class
35
Conclusion Kohlberg made from his research about his theory (in terms of condition development)
There is a link between developing cognitive skills such as considering other people’s pov and developing through stages Where they take in data (thinking) to take in new information but balance these thoughts with their experiences (cognitive organisation) Morality develops In the same, invariant stages regardless of the culture grown in
36
Conclusion Kohlberg made from his research about his theory (in terms of cultures)
His theory was universal regardless of where you grow up: different cultures will have different answers to his dilemmas but the overall thinking followed his stages
37
Conclusion Kohlberg made from his research about his theory (in terms of children comprehending next stage)
In discussion, a child (eg at stage 3) can comprehend and accept the next stage that they’re at (eg stage 4) But they cannot comprehend the stage after that (stage 5) But they can comprehend but reject previous stage (stage 2)
38
How does kohlberg’s theory differ from behaviourist and psychodynamic theory?
Behaviourist and psychodynamic theory differentiate moral thinking and action But Kohlberg links them directly
39
Evaluation of construct validity
Hard to show demand characteristics or social desirability because hard to guess kohlberg’s aims and show higher stage moral thinking But could be a measure of linguistic ability and intelligence instead?
40
Evaluation of population validity
Low for only using boys and not measure of all age ranges High for range of cultures in cross cultural study
41
Evaluation for ecological validity
Certain dilemmas may have unfamiliar situations + all hypothetical so unsure if they will actually think this way irl
42
Evaluation of reliability
High: 75 is large sample for boys Standardised where 50% of boys answers had to match a stage to be put their Low: unknown sample size for other cultures Need to replicate test but difficult as it was unstructured interview
43
Evaluation of ethics
Good: informed consent every 3 years and had right to withdraw/ignore Kohlberg No deception as he genuinely just wanted their answers Low: some scenarios may be upsetting, involving death and disease etc
44
Evaluation of sample
Low generalisability as the sample only used boys from a specific area in states Perhaps girls show different moral reasoning as proposed by Gilligan
45
Evaluation of ethnocentrism
Assumption that all cultures have same moral reasoning could be ethnocentric but lessened by it being a cross cultural study But still many cultures not represented in his study
46
Evaluation of kohlberg’s actual theory
Argument that perhaps stages don’t develop as you progress, for example stage 5 is different than 6 but not necessarily inferior
47
Evaluation of research method
Longitudinal study may cause participant attrition (dropping out) which could skew the sample eg those who are developing would remain Also time +costs but Kohlberg knew this so not an issue