Territory And Personal Space Flashcards

1
Q

Territory

A

Areas that people lay claim to and will defend because they perceive themselves as having ownership of them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Personal space

A

An invisible ‘bubble’ that surrounds us wherever we go, regulating how close we let people come to us.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Key research

A

Wells

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Additional research

A

Smith - territorial behaviour on beaches
Hall - zones of personal space
Middlemist - personal space invasion in urinals
Sommer and Ross - seating arrangements in hospital waiting rooms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Background to Wells’s research; what is personalisation?

A

A way people in the office mark their territory is by personalisation of their desk (territorial behaviour)
Personalisation = the deliberate decoration or modification of an environment by its occupants to reflect their identities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were the aims of Wells’s study?

A

Investigate differences in workplace personalisation between men and women: is it done differently and whos it more important too?
Investigate effect of personalisation on employee well being
Investigate company’s personalisation policy with organisational well being

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Original number of companies Wells contacted

A

700

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Final sample of NUMBER OF COMPANIES Wells study of those who responded + were suitable?

A

20 companies with at least 15 employees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What type of companies were included in Wells’s study?

A

air conditioning firm
car dealership
real estate agencies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Wells sample of office workers who returned the survey?

A

338

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Where was Wells study?

A

Orange county, Cali, US

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Outline of Wells’s main procedure

A

Collect data from 338 office workers via self report surveys
Follow up case studies of structured interviews

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did Wells’s self reported survey include?

A

Rating scales that asked about:
workplace personalisation, how
satisfaction with workplace environment and job itself
well being
personality traits
employee’s perception of organisational well being

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How did Wells know which gender answered the survey?

A

Survey included personal demographic information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How many participants went for the follow up case study?

A

23 employees
15 women
8 men

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Wells results: what gender personalizes more and what data shows this?

A

Women personalise more than men
11 items relative to men’s 7-8 items on average

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Wells results: differences across genders of how personalisation occurs??

A

Women tend to personalise to express identities and emotions by using items that represent friends and family
Men tend to personalise with sports merchandise and items that represent achievements to show status in company

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Wells results;correlation between personalisation and well being?

A

Strong and significant association between personalisation > work place satisfaction> job satisfaction > improved well being

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What did Wells case studies qual data suggest?

A

Personalisation may be significantly more beneficial to womens well being than mens well being

20
Q

What did wells conclude about company organisational policy?

A

Companies more lenient with workplace personalisation report more positive organisation of company, greater morale (well being)

21
Q

Conclusion of Wells study

A

Personalisation differs from men to women but it will have a positive effect on improved well being/ company organisation

22
Q

Problem of Wells study

A

Cannot generalise personalisation policies to all companies: could have a negative consequence if someone uses offensive items
Cannot assume personalisation is cause and effect: other company policies may effect???????????

23
Q

Outline of Smiths additional research

A

A naturalistic observation in the field (a beach) on how different nationalities compete for space (territory) on the beach

24
Q

What nationalities were investigated in Smiths study?

A

French
West German
US
Beaches in these countries

25
What did Smith measure in his study?
The size, depth and width of occupied space (territory) for each beach goer number and type of territorial markers recorded Interviews beach goers opinions
26
Results of Smith?
West Germans made larger territorial claims than American/French French did not grasp concept of territoriality
27
How did Germans mark territory in Smith?
Used sandcastles to mark territory Placed reserved signs on areas
28
Hall’s additional research
His theory of 4 zones of personal space from observation on white middle class Americans And differences across cultures
29
4 zones of personal space in Hall’s theory
Public Social Personal Intimate
30
Public zone of personal space: Hall
Allows the general public to be at this distance
31
Social zone of personal space: Hall
Impersonal business contacts allowed in this bubble
32
Personal zone of personal space: Hall
Allows contact between close friends and family
33
Intimate zone of personal space: Hall
For sex Comforting someone Physical contact sports
34
What cultures are contact cultures according to Hall?
Arabic, Hispanic, Mediterranean LESS interpersonal distance
35
What cultures according to Hall are non contact cultures?
North European Prefer more distance to people
36
Aim of Middlemist
Investigate whether personal space invasions cause uncomfortable physiological arousal among males using urinals
37
Where did Middlemist’s study take place?
At men’s toilet at a University Where there were 3 urinals
38
Procedure of Middlemist
Participant uses a urinal Confederate comes in and will choose a urinal depending on the condition An observer in adjacent stall records how long P took to urinate and how long they did for
39
3 conditions for Middlemist
Close distance: using urinal directly next to participant Medium distance: using urinal at the end not next to participant Control: no confederate
40
What type of observation is Middlemist?
Covert observation: hidden observer in stall Uses periscope to observe buried in pile of books (?)
41
Results of Middlemist
Participant took longer to start urinating and left sooner compared to rest (no shit)
42
Conclusions of Middlemist
Personal space invasions have physiological arousal effects: Hard to start urinating and occurs quicker to leave
43
Stommer and Ross aim
Investigating effect of different seating arrangements in a hospital waiting room on stressful effect of being in hospital
44
Stommer and Ross: seating arrangements
Sociofugal: rows along walls facing away, people not facing each other Sociopetal: small circular groups of chairs facing towards each other
45
Results of Stommer and Ross
Sociopetal (facing towards) overcomes depressing and stressful effect of hospital waiting room Still requires maintains personal space, done by sociofugal
46
3 office design strategies for office to maintain territory
Allow personalisation of desks area: Wells Allow personalisation of overall office space by purchasing desk chairs on wheels etc: Wells Make employers aware of employees differences 8n territory across cultures: Smith
47
Application to design office space to encourage personal space?
Rearrange seats in a combined sociofugal and Sociopetal design to encourage personal space: Stommer and Ross Educate employers on differences in amount of interpersonal space favoured: Hall Design layout of desks to be at comfortable differences for employees or else uncomfortable physiological reactions: Middlemist