Forensics- Offender Profiling: Bottom-up Approach Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

The bottom-up approach -

A

Profilers work up from evidence collected from the crime scene to develop hypotheses about the likely characteristics, motivations and social background of the offender.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Investigative psychology -

A

A form of bottom-up profiling that matches details from the crime scene with statistical analysis of typical offender behaviour patterns based on psychological theory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Geographical profiling -

A

A form of bottom-up profiling based on the principle of spatial consistency: that an offender’s operational base and possible future offences are revealed by the geographical location of their previous crimes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the aim of the bottom-up approach?

A

To generate a picture of the offender, including their likely characteristics, routine behavior, and social background, through systematic analysis of crime scene evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does the bottom-up approach differ from the US top-down approach?

A

The bottom-up approach is data-driven, emerging from detailed scrutiny of the offence, whereas the top-down approach begins with fixed typologies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the bottom-up approach grounded in?

A

It is grounded in psychological theory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is investigative psychology?

A

A discipline that applies statistical procedures and psychological theory to analyze crime scene evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the aim of investigative psychology in offender profiling?

A

To establish patterns of behavior across crime scenes and create a statistical database for comparison.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is interpersonal coherence in investigative psychology?

A

The concept that an offender’s behavior at the crime scene reflects their everyday behavior, such as their interactions with others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How can time and place be significant in investigative psychology?

A

They may indicate where an offender is living or operating from.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does forensic awareness refer to?

A

It describes individuals who have been interrogated by police before and are mindful of covering their tracks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is geographical profiling?

A

A technique that uses the locations of linked crime scenes to infer an offender’s likely home or operational base (crime mapping).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the assumption behind geographical profiling?

A

Serial offenders usually operate within familiar geographical areas, creating a spatial pattern investigators can analyze.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a ‘centre of gravity’ in geographical profiling?

A

The central area of a spatial pattern, likely to include the offender’s home or base.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a ‘jeopardy surface’ in geographical profiling?

A

An educated guess about where the offender might strike next.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are Canter and Larkin’s two models of offender behavior?

A

•The marauder: operates close to their home base.

•The commuter: travels a distance away from their residence.

17
Q

How does the pattern of offending relate to an offender’s home base?

A

It often forms a circle around their usual residence, becoming more apparent with multiple offences.

18
Q

What insights can spatial decision-making provide investigators?

A

It can reveal whether the crime was planned or opportunistic and offer clues about the offender’s mental maps, mode of transport, employment status, and approximate age.

19
Q

What evidence supports investigative psychology?

A

David Canter and Rupert Heritage (1990) conducted a content analysis of 66 sexual assault cases using smallest space analysis, identifying common behaviors such as impersonal language and lack of victim reaction. These findings demonstrated how offender behavior patterns can change over time and how crimes can be linked to the same offender.

20
Q

How does this evidence support investigative psychology?

A

It shows that statistical techniques can be applied effectively to analyze behavior patterns and aid in criminal investigations.

21
Q

What evidence supports geographical profiling?

A

Samantha Lundrigan and David Canter (2001) analyzed 120 serial murder cases in the USA using smallest space analysis, revealing spatial consistency. Body disposal sites often formed a pattern around a ‘centre of gravity,’ which aligned with the offender’s base, especially for marauders.

22
Q

How does this evidence support geographical profiling?

A

It validates Canter’s claim that spatial information is crucial for determining an offender’s base.

23
Q

Why is the bottom-up approach considered to have a scientific basis?

A

It is grounded in evidence and psychological theory, relying less on speculation. Advanced AI tools help process geographical, biographical, and psychological data quickly, producing actionable insights.

24
Q

What wider applications does the bottom-up approach have?

A

Unlike the top-down approach, it can be applied to a range of crimes, including burglary and theft, as well as serious crimes like murder and rape.

25
Q

What is a limitation of the top-down approach in comparison?

A

It is best suited to a narrow range of crimes, such as murder and rape, and is less adaptable to other offences.

26
Q

What are the mixed results for profiling?

A

While profiling has produced many successes, there have also been failures. For instance:
•Gary Copson (1995) found profiling advice was ‘useful’ in 83% of cases but only led to accurate offender identification in 3%.

•Richard Kocsis et al. (2002) showed that chemistry students outperformed experienced detectives in creating an accurate offender profile in a solved murder case.

27
Q

What do these mixed results suggest about profiling?

A

Although profiling can aid investigations, it is not consistently reliable for identifying offenders and should be used alongside other investigative methods.