Research Methods- Validity Flashcards
Validity in psychological research:
Researchers gather data and produce findings in psychological studies. We need to question if it is truthful to say that these findings accurately reflect natural behaviour. Psychologists have to consider both the internal and external validity of their results.
Internal validity:
Questions the cause and effect relationship between the change the researcher made to the independent variable (IV) and the observed change in the dependent variable (DV). If the change in the DV was influenced by any other factor than the IV (due to a lack of control), the findings lack internal validity.
Internal validity
Questions the cause and effect relationship between the change the researcher made to the independent variable (IV) and the observed change in the dependent variable (DV). If the change in the DV was influenced by any other factor than the IV (due to a lack of control), the findings lack internal validity.
Social desirability bias:
Participants hide their genuine opinions/behaviours and instead act/respond in a more socially acceptable way to “look good”.
Demand characteristics:
Participants think they have discovered the aim and behave in a way they believe will produce results supporting the researcher’s theory.
Investigator effects:
The researcher’s behaviour (or personal characteristics) influences the participants’ behaviour, including researcher bias, when the researcher either consciously or unconsciously influences the results. The participant’s behaviour could be affected by the researcher using more positive body language/tone of voice when participants behave as expected according to theory. The researcher could also be biased in how they interpret participant behaviours and responses.
Uncontrolled extraneous variables:
Lack of control; this is not using standardised procedures, identifying and eliminating extraneous variables or not controlling for participant variables by randomly assigning participants to groups.
External validity:
Questions if a study’s findings can be generalised beyond the study.
So from the sample used to the target population and from the experimental set-up to other “real world” settings and activities.
Ecological validity:
The extent to which the findings of any particular study can be generalised to alternative environments, e.g. if moving a test of obedience from a laboratory setting to a busy city street, would obedient behaviour be replicated?
Mundane realism:
The extent to which the task/materials/ activities used in an experimental set-up are similar to the stimuli experienced in the real world.
Population validity:
The extent to which the sample used in the study is representative of the target population. (e.g. gender, age, ethnicity, education level)
Temporal validity:
the extent to which the findings of a study can be generalised to other time periods. Generally asked of older studies, questioning if the findings on topics like social influence, attachment, relationships and gender would be the same if researchers conducted the study in modern society.
Face validity:
Does the test appear to measure what it claims to be measuring?
Criterion validity:
Confidence in the validity of a test increases if we can compare the data from a test to another measure of the same variable and identify a correlation.
Concurrent validity:
The extent to which data from the newly created test is similar to an established test of the same variable conducted at the same time.
A test of correlation assesses this; there is high concurrent validity if the strength of the correlation is +0.8 or higher.