BIOL 437 Ch. 12 (Clinical Epidemiology) Flashcards

1
Q

clinical epidemiology

A

-focuses on patients and application of epidemiolgoic methods to assess efficacy of screening, diagnosis and treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

clinical epidemiology is used to

A

-identify health consequences of employing a test or administering treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

secondary prevention

A

-health screening and detection activities used to identify disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

examples of screening methods

A
  • pap test
  • mamograms
  • blood tests
  • biopsy
  • small blood sample
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

medical screening

A

-used to suggest or detect disease among individuals in a population without signs or symptoms of the health problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

why do we do screening?

A

-promote the detection of disease in their earliest stages, when treatment has the greatest chance of working
>to reduce morbidity and mortality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

mass screening

A
  • not selective

- involves application of screening tests to the total population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

selective screening

A

-applying the screening tests to high risk groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

screening guidelines (WHO 1968)

A
  • major medical problem
  • acceptable treatment
  • access to health care services
  • recognizable course
  • suitable and effective test
  • testing process acceptable to general population
  • natural history known
  • procedures for those who need further testing
  • simple process
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

evaluating screening guidelines using descriptive and analytical epidemiology

A
  • extent of public health problem
  • efficacy of treatment
  • access to health care
  • natural course of disease
  • efficacy of screening or diagnostic test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

validity

A

-how well the test actually measures what it is supposed to measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

reliability

A
  • how well the test performs in use over time

* repeatability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

yield

A

-amount of screening the test can accomplish in a period of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

validity refers to

A

-accuracy and trustworthiness of instruments, data and findings in research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

2 ways to view and assess validity

A
  1. Content validity

2. Construct validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

content validity

A

-achieved when instrument has appropriate content for measuring a complex concept or construct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

construct validity

A

-the measues ‘get at’ or actually measure what you are actually studying

18
Q

accuracy

A
  • degree to which measurement represents what it is intended to represent
  • important influence on validity
19
Q

sensitivity

A
  • ability of a test to correctly identify those WITH the disease
  • proportion of subjects with the diease who have a positive test
20
Q

sensitivity equation

A

=TP/ (TP+FN)

21
Q

specificity

A
  • ability of a test to correctly identify those WITHOUT the disease
  • proportion of subjects without the disease who have a negative test
22
Q

specificy equation

A

=TN/ (TN+FP)

23
Q

overall accuracy

A

-ability of a test to predict the presence or absence of a disease

24
Q

PV+

A

-proportion of people with a positive test result who have the disease (relates to sensitivity)

25
PV-
-proportion of people with a negative test result who do not have the disease (relates to specificity)
26
likelihood ratios
-2 additional measures of appraising screening and diagnostic evidence >LR+ >LR= -less sensitive to variations in base rate than specificity and sensitivity
27
base rate
-percentage of people in a sample with the health-related state or event of interest
28
LR+
=sensitivity/(1-specificity) | -level of convidence that a person who obtains a score in the affected range truly DOES have the health problem
29
LR-
=(1-specificity)/sensitivity | -confidence that a score in the unaffected range comes from a person who truly DOES NOT have a health problem
30
prognosis
-prediction of the course of the disease based on anticipation from the natural hisotry of the disease
31
prognostic indicators
-tell the doctor the likely behaviour of the cancer and its responsiveness to treatment
32
measures of prognosis
- case fatality rate | - survival rate
33
case fatality rate
-proportion of newly diagnosed cases that die from a given disease in a specified period
34
survival rate
-proportion of persons surviving, regardless of cause of death
35
Cox proportional hazards regression model
-useful for analyzing survival data -indicates probability that a person will experience an event -estimate relative risk, adjusted for potential prognositc factors >minimizes threat of confounding
36
lead time
-difference in time between the date of diagnosis with screening and date of diagnosis without screening
37
lead time bias
- when lead time is counted in the survival time of patients | - gives a misleading picture of the benefit of treatment
38
selection bias
- choosing data that distorts the outcome of a test | - may make a test look better or worse than it really is, in terms of survival
39
over-diagnosis bias
- when screening identifies an illness that would not have shown clinical signs before a person's death from other causes - makes screening efforts look good because of increased identifications of abnormalities - individual may undergo unnecessary treatment with its accompanying risk
40
avoiding bias
- randomized controlled trial= GOLD standard | - different prognositc factors are balanced between groups and "true" screening or treatment effect can be determined
41
outcome research
- a relatively new field that seeks to understand the end results of clinical practices and interventions - combines info about the care people are getting - important in developing better ways to monitor and improve clinical care
42
clinical epidemiology conclusion
- involves application of epidemiologic methods to improve quality and value of patient care - involves assessment of the efficacy of screening, diagnosis and treatment strategies in clinical settings