systematic attributions and depression lect 4 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

schachter and singer 2 factor theory of emotion

A

-people use cues to label ambiguous arousal
-emotions differ according to how arousal is attributed
-model believes emotion is a product of:
1.ambiguous physiological arousal
2.cog. which labels the cause of the arousal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

schachter and singer study

A

3 groups of pp
1.informed adrenaline administered group
2.uninformed adrenaline administered group
3.no adrenaline group
-each pp placed in room with confederate
-confederate behaves either euphorically or angrily
-the informed adrenaline group can explain their arousal so emotion will not match the confederates
-control group have no increased arousal (no adrenaline), so emotion will not match confederates
-uninformed adrenaline group cannot explain their behaviour (cued emotion - so experience emotion similar to confederate)
-the way people attribute the cause of arousal causes emotion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the systematic attributions to understand depression

A

1.learned helplessness
2.attributional style

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is attributional style

A

tendency to make particular kinds of causal inferences rather than others across diff situations and across time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

learned helplessness

A

seligman: depression is a result of learned helplessness
-phase 1: dogs receive electric shock they could not escape (pavlovian hammock)
-phase 2: 24 hrs later dogs placed in 2 compartment box, shocks administered and dogs could easily escape shocks
RESULTS
-2/3 dogs failed to attempt to escape
-control dogs (no phase 1) all escaped
-phase 1 dogs learned no connection between actions and receiving shocks
-learned helplessness generalised to phase 2 and here the dogs looked depressed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

learned helplessness parallel to human depression

A

1.people experience events attributed as uncontrollable
2.reinforces helplessness
3.leads to passive behaviour in adverse situations
4.inability to learn from successful escape responses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

goodman and hess 1999

A

-looked at depression in people with ICD (defibrillator)
-shocks not predictable and can be distressing
-no. of ICD shocks is sig predictor of depressive symptoms
-depression could be linked to the unpredictability of ICD shocks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

criticism of learned helplessness as an account for depression

A

-seligman’s theory focused on lack of control
BUT
-there is more to depression than lack of control
-learned helplessness does not account for chronicity and generality of depression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are abramson’s 2 factors on depression

A

-attributions of why bad situations occur
-dispositional way people make attributions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

abramsons 3 dimensions

A
  1. internality - externality
    -locus of control
    -accounts for self esteem deficits in depression

2.stable - unstable
-temporal permanence of cause
-accounts for chronicity of depression

3.global - specific
-degree of influence cause of depression has over other aspects of life
-accounts for generality/pervasiveness of depression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

pessimistic attributional style

A

vulnerability to depression
-tendency to attribute neg events to causes that are: internal, stable (enduring) and global (affects many aspects)
-tendency to attribute pos events to causes that are: external, unstable, specific (only affects one aspect)
(people who are optimistic do the opposite)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

attributional style implies consistency over time

A

peterson attributional style questionnaire
-gave questionnaire to pp at diff times
-correlation between scores at 2 diff time points

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

seligman research

A

-143 student pp completed beck depression inventry
-correlations between attributional components and dep. were:
dep + internality = .41
dep + stability = .34
dep + globality = .35
-weakness: just correlational, just student population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Raps study

A

-compared attributional style between patients hospitalised for:
unipolar depression, schizophrenia, medical surgery
-patients with depression had higher scores for internality, stability and globality with unipolar depression and schizophrenia than those who had had medical surgery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

hilsman and garber study

A

-measured attributional style and depression in children before and following poor grades to school test
-kids who had depressed attributional style had increased depression after receiving poor grades

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is self serving bias

A

-normal attributional style where people take a pos view
-taking credit for good events
-externalising cause of bad events
(people with depression may not show this bias)

17
Q

alloy and abramson

A

-pp press a button when a yellow light comes on
-either pressing or not pressing depends on rules of program, pp do not know rules but have to work them out to get most points
-whether light comes on is entirely random and there are actually no rules but pp are unaware
-people with elevated depression had better grasp of random nature of the study, realistic in attributing cause

18
Q

why is it that non depressed people have a self serving bias which is not realistic

A

-can be protective to indiv in diff circumstances

19
Q

carver

A

study of adjustment to having breast cancer
-found optimists less likely to give up and adjusted better than pessimists

20
Q

moore and fresco

A

-meta analysis of 75 studies
-found small dep realism effect
-everyone has self serving bias but people with depression may have it slightly less