(automatic) attitudes and behaviour 1 lect 3 Flashcards

1
Q

why are attitudes studied

A

may be able to predict, change, cause behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

do attitudes guide behaviour

A

LaPiere (1934)
-reported trip around america with chinese friends (prejudice against chinese at this time)
-visited hundreds of hotels and restaurants and only got refused entry to 1 place
-6 months later, sent a questionnaire to each place they visited
-92% responses said they would refuse entry to chinese people BUT this was not the reality
-clear discrepancy between attitude and behaviour

Wicker
-meta analysis
-average correlation between attitude and behaviour was .15
-maybe attitudes do not predict behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what do smith and mackie claim we should be asking about attitudes

A

how and under what conditions do attitudes predict behaviour?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the function of attitudes for behaviour

A

-efficient processing of info, processing shortcuts (smith and mackie)
-efficient guides to behaviour
-pre established evaluations that easily come to mind
-we might not even be aware there is a decision e.g escalator or stairs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

historic characteristics of automatic processes (Bargh and Kunda)

A

-occur outside of awareness
-unintended (un volitional)
-uncontrollable
-efficient (do not need many cog. resources)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are the two main characteristics of social behaviours

A

kunda
-efficiency
-lack of awareness/intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is automatic activation of attitudes

A

when attitudes come to mind effortlessly and inescapably (fazio)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

when do automatic attitudes come to mind

A

Fazio: attitude = association between internal representation of an object with an evaluation
-memory event, attitude target has become mentally associated with evaluation
-when object comes to mind, evaluation follows as the two have been associated in memory
-stronger mental link = stronger the attitude

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is attitude strength

A

association of an object representation and the evaluation of it
-strong object evaluation association leads to faster attitude accessibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is attitude accessibility

A

speed and ease of attitude activation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how are automatic attitudes developed

A

-evaluation is incorporated into the representation of the object over time (smith and mackie)
-associative memory
-more frequently they occur, the stronger the association

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

roskos , ewoldson and fazio study

A

-pp evaluated series of attitude objects (attitude rehearsal)
-control pp presented with objects but instead of giving attitudinal response (pos/neg), they give non attitudinal response (is it animate or inanimate)
-subsequent testing involved pp asked to provide evaluations
-experimental group were able to respond faster due to rehearsed more accessible attitudes
-repeated object evaluation pairings enhanced attitude accessibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

are attitudes accessed automatically

A

Fazio
-evaluative priming task
-phase 1: pp presented with objects and respond whether they think it is good/bad, response speed recorded, faster response = stronger attitude
-phase 2: pp shown normatively pos (delightful) and neg (repulsive) words, pp respond as quickly as they can
-these words presented with primes just before presentation of target words
-primes were words from previous phase 1 which pp responded quickly to (had stronger attitude towards)

-where target and prime shared same valance (pos/neg), pp responded quickly compared to diff valance
-automatic evaluations of the prime occurred effecting evaluation of target

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

automatic attitudes and spontaneous behaviour

A

-spontaneous behaviour will occur when attitudes are easily activated (Fazio and Zanna)
-automatic attitudes influence spontaneous behaviour not volitional ones
-stronger the attitude = more likely spontaneous behaviour will follow (be attitude consistent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

fazio et al study on spontaneous behaviour

A

-pp rehearse attitude towards set of puzzles
-pp given free reign to play with puzzles if they want to
-whether pp engaged in puzzle depended on their attitude
-pos attitude = more likely to play with puzzle
-more attitude was rehearsed = more they would engage
-highly rehearsed post attitude = more likely to engage in puzzle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how do attitudes guide spontaneous behaviour

A

focusing attention
-strong like/dislike grabs attention
-people attend things that are salient

Calitri et al
-strong link found between strength of automatic attitude towards exercise and peoples likelihood to respond visually to exercise cues

17
Q

fazio theory on attitude consistent behaviour

A

-attitudes make certain objects more salient
-we respond to salient features of object
-approach likeable things and avoid dislikeable things
-behave in a way consistent with accessible attitude

18
Q

how do automatic attitudes influence behaviours

A

biasing interpretations
-assimilation and contrast effects
-ambiguous info may be interpreted as supportive of strongly held attitude

19
Q

Lord, Ross and Lepper study on automatic attitudes

A

-pp shown ficticious reports about: pro/ anti capital punishment
-both reports had strengths and weaknesses
-pp divided into supporters and opponents of capital punishment
-reporters found supportive report more convincing
-death penality opponents found opposing report more convincing
-pre existing attitudes had clouded or influenced interpretation of capital punishment
-attitudes act as a filter through which we precieve the world and this effects the way we interpret incoming info and impacts our behaviour

20
Q

what is the mode model

A

-hewstone: when either the motivation or opportunity to make a reasoned decision is low, only attitudes that are highly accessible will predict spontaneous behaviour

21
Q

what is the nature of memory associations

A

single tag evaluation
-we have mental representation of entire entity of object when linked to an evaluation

22
Q

what is the idea that memory is involved

A

when encountering an attitude object we refer to an existing memory of an evaluation

23
Q

critique of the idea memory is involved

A

Bargh
-pp not aware they are making evaluations
-asked to read words from screen (normatively pos or neg words)
-words primed by another valance loaded word
-pp asked to read target word
-when prime and target word share valance = fast responding
-when valance is inconsistent = slower responding

24
Q

what does study by Bargh show

A

as the only thing in common was the valance, the process involving memory of shared meaning cannot be involved

25
Q

does context influence automatic attitudes

A

Mitchell
-black athletes and white politicians
-either emphasised target person’s occupation or race
-pp automatically evaluated black athletes as more pos than white politicians when task emphasised occupation
-when task emphasised race, white politicians viewed more pos
-attitudes are effected by context

26
Q

how do we explain context effects on automatic attitudes

A

attitudes automatically derived from memory BUT not attitude object as entire entity that now has a single tag to an evaluation
-many things come to mind per moment that are valance loaded
-attitude towards object in valance loaded context is the sum of all pos and neg in that moment