measuring attitudes and expectancies lect 5 Flashcards
how is choice of data collection influenced
by the theory under scrutiny
-draws on previous research and looks at the methods used
explicit measures
-requires people to introspect
-take time to think about their views thoughts beliefs etc
-believed that introspections provide valid insight to how a person feels so measured using self report questionnaires
what are the issues to avoid in explicit research
-ambiguous qs: respondent may interpret diff to how you intended so therefore, not relevant to the subject of interest, hard to compare between people
-leading qs: encourages a certain response, response bias, responses are not authentic and do not reflect what people really think
-vague qs: where specific construct is not well defined pp may answer related not specific qs you are interested in
designing a questionnaire
-what is the issue/theory/topic
-dont try to cover too much: leads to long questionnaire so pp lose motivation
-keep them short and concise
-pilot studies helpful to establish what to include/exclude
question content
-wording of qs is important
-think about the respondents (do they have the necessary knowledge, target the survey to the people who have the info you need)
-ask a qs in a simple form
-use simple language and be specific
-avoid technical terms and slang
-void ambiguity as this adds noise to data
-keep in mind periodical qs (longer the time frame leads to more general estimates e.g how often do you exercise in a week/month)
how do you go about providing a scale for topic of interest
1.nominal scales (categorical)
2.likert scales (likert)
3.semantic differential scale (osgood 1957)
nominal scale
puts person in category, can get complicated with sub categories
likert scales
method of measuring attitudes in a way to allow for analysis, tried to capture degree of strength to which people might endorse a qs or concept
likert scales use a continuum where pp make ratings e.g 1=not at all to 5=very much, value given to each response category
semantic differential scale
-uses continuum with anchored adjectives
-respondents place mark with respect to adjective end points to indicate opinion strength
what is an issue encountered with a survey
desirability bias
-certain topics are sensitive/ value laiden/ embarrassing for pp
-pp may not want to be forthcoming so modify behaviour or not answer truthfully
-finding out motives for these behaviours is very hard
some solutions to social desirability bias
1.Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale: asks pp their sensitivity to social desirability issues and gain measure of this to use as a covariate to control for this issue
2.’lie’ scale: including qs where most pp will answer differently to how they would actually behave
3.’bogus pipeline’: pretend lie detector, encourages pp to be truthful
4.implicit measure
what is the main implicit measure
-dominance of the explicit
-popular models are treated as explicit e.g theory of planned behaviour, theory of reasoned action, self efficacy etc
-BUT to what extent are people able to accurately introspect
-are there non conscious influences on peoples responding that are being overlooked
-if there are then the measure is not capturing a full picture as to why people behave in the way they do
nisbett and wilson research for dominance of the explicit
-set up stall in shopping centre
-asked passers by to select item they liked and why
-found most people selected items on the R of the display (R hand bias)
-when asked why people dont mention fact it is on R side
-pp unaware of R side bias when making judgements
-pp unaware so unable to make accurate introspections
behaving out of habit
Wood et al
-43% of peoples daily activities can be classed as habitual
-this means self report measures of motivation may overlook important processes related to unintended habitual behaviour
(processes outside of awareness/ implicit may be inaccessible to introspection)
implicit/ automatic attitudes
-evaluation/attitudes can be unintended or occur outside of conscious awareness (people do not always know they have made an evaluation/decision)
-evidence suggests that automatic attitudes can explain spontaneous behaviours