mutual and unrequited love in adolescence Flashcards
what is limerence
tennov
-describing experience of intense emotional and sexual attraction for a desired romantic partner
-a form of passionate love
how is limerence studied
attempts include interviews and narratives
Tennov’s components of passionate love
-intrusive thinking
-tendency to dwell on other’s characteristics
-later studies describe it as an emotional state with a neurochemical background
-(presumed it was a primitive emotion experienced before pubity)
natural and sexual selection
-evolutionary psych proposed passionate love as being product of natural and sexual selection
-passionate love is what our genotype has predetermined in order to pass on our genes and survive
-another notion: falling in love creates variability in offspring that can lead to survival (ST partners)
sexual strategies theory
-men prefer ST relationships over women
-major distinction between mutual and unrequited love
aim
-examine frequency of experiencing passionate love during adolescence
-examine gender differences in this frequency
method
-140 undergrad psych students (18-43 yrs)
-53% serious relationship, 19% dating, 28% single
-4 age groups (diff developmental stages)
-pp reported love experiences, frequency, duration and intensity for mutual and unrequited love
-looked at personality styles and love styles
results
-all pp had at least 1 love experience
-6.43% reported 1 episode of mutual love
-2.14% no mutual love experiences
-20.71% 5+ love (mutual) experiences and 5+ unrequited love experiences
-mean unrequited love increased sig with age in men (ages 10-20 unrequited love outnumbered mutual)
-mean no of unrequited love increased sig between 10-15, then remained level (16-20), at 16-20 mutual love higher in women
-both types of love increased from childhood to adolescence
conclusions
-frequency of experiencing love increased across age groups
-higher unrequited love reported in men in late adolescence compared to women (same age), other ages and ML in same age
variation of study
-extra age group added (50)
–results suggest UL returns to levels like ages 10-15
–no mean difference between gender and type of love
–ML remained high, no statistical diff found with late adolescents
limitations
-narratives so subjective
-methodological issues with design e.g sample size
-background theory about age groups –developmental implications
-unequal gender groups
future directions
-better design to measure specifically
-larger sample size
-to assess accumulative frequency, much older sample needed for accurate developmental implications