Research methods-scientific processes Flashcards
diagram of the scientific method
observe-question-hypothesis-test-conclude-redo
what are the features of a science
-objectivity and empirical evidence
-replicability and falsifiability
-theory construction and hypothesis testing
-paradigms and paradigms shifts
what is objectivity
when the researcher is not letting their own biases or expectations influence the research process
why should research be objective
-it has practical applications if research is flawed this could have serious repercussions
what are the most + least objective ways of carrying out research
most-lab experiement-high level of control over the varibales
least-natural-No control over manipulation of the IV
what is empiricism
gaining data based on direct sensory experience
eg-directly oberving behaviour
how can theories be created and modified
created through induction
modified through deduction
what is replicability
ability to conduct research again and achieve consistent results
what is replicability also used to access
the validity of the findings-if the findings can be truely generalised and be valid
you would expect that replication using the same standardied procedure would produce similar findigs and reach the same conclusion
how can we draw conclusions about the generalisability of the results by replicating research
replicate research in different settings with different popualtions
what is falsifiability
refers to the idea that a research hypothesis could be proved wrong
why do we start with the null hypothesis
we start with the null hypothesis if the results do not support the null hypothesis this can be rejected and we can accept the alternative hypothesis
what is a paradigm
a shared set of assumption about a subject matter/behaviour and its discipline and the methods appropriate to its study
how did Kuhn say a paradigm shift occurs
theres a “normal science phase” where theres a dominant paradigm which remains despite occasional disconfirming evidence
eventually enough challenging evidence will accumulate causing scientists to question the dominant paradigm this will cause a scientific revolution and a paradigm shift where a new paradigm will replace previously accepted assumptions
why would this mean psychology is classed as a pre-science
there isnt currently a shared paradigm there is a number of different theoretical perspectives which differ in terms of what aspect of human behaviour they study and how they go about studying iy
what is peer review
process of subjecting a piece of work to independent scrutiny by other psychologists working in a similar field wo consider the research in terms of validity, significance and orginality
describe the peer review process
The psychologist will submit their research to a suitable journal
The editor will then pass it on to a number of reviewers who are experts in that field
They will then scrutinise the research
The reviewer will pass their comments back to the editor and they may recommend the following
That the research may be published
The research may be recommended for publishing so long as the researcher makes minor modifications
The research may be rejected but with a recommendation that the researcher makes major modification and resubmits the work through view
The research may be rejected
what is the purpose of peer review
-ensures that only the highest quality research enters the public domain
-it prevents unwarrented claims/ deliberate fraud from occuring which retains the integrity of psychology
some economical purposes of peer review
the amount of research that an intuition gets published in a high quality peer-review journal is a way of accessing the research rating of the university
this helps make decisions of where research funding should be allocated
how is peer review usually carried out
in a single blind manner. This means the identity of the reviewer is not revealed to the researcher. This allows the reviewer to be critical without fear of repercussions from the researcher
what are 3 advantages of peer review
-showing work to other increases the probability that weaknesses will be identified
-peer review ensures published research can be taken seriously as it has been scrutinised by fellow researchers
-peers can judge the significance/how original it is
what are 3 disadvantages of peer review
-there may not be a suitably qualified expert to scrutinize the research so poor quality research may be published
-there’s publication bias which leads to significant results being published rather than non-significant ones-referred to as the file drawer
-studies that challenge the status quo are unlikely to be published which slows the development down of science
