Lecture 9- Variable Associations, Causation and the role of Change Flashcards

1
Q

Koch’s Postulates

A

Demonstrated association between a microorganism and a disease

  1. Organism must be observed in every case of disease
  2. Must be isolated and grown in pure culture
  3. Pure culture must, when inoculated into a susceptible animal, reproduce the disease
  4. Organism must be observed in, and recovered from, the experimental animal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Richard Doll and Bradford Hill discovered what

A

Found strong associations between smoking and lung cancer deaths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Hills criteria for causation

A
  1. Strength
  2. Consistency
  3. Specificity
  4. Temporality
  5. Biological gradient
  6. Plausibility
  7. Coherence
  8. Experiment
  9. Analogy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Hill’s strength for causation

A

Strong associations give support to causal relationship between factor and disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hill’s consistency for causation

A

An association has been observed repeatedly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hill’s specificity for causation

A

Association is constrained to a particular disease-exposure relationship, specific cause leads to specific effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Hill’s temporality for causation

A

The cause/exposure must be observed before the effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Hill’s biological gradient for causation

A

Also known as dose response; shows a linear trend in the association between exposure and disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Hill’s plausibility for causation

A

The association must be biologically plausible form the standpoint of contemporary biological knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hill’s coherence for causation

A

The cause and effect interpretation of our data should not seriously conflict with the generally known facts of the natural history and biology of the disease

Ex: histopathologic effects of smoking on bronchial epithelium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hill’s experiment for causation

A

Preventative actions alter the frequency of the outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hill’s analogy of causation

A

Should be similarities between known associations and one that is being evaluated for causality

Ex: persons exposed to secondhand smoke should also have increase in lung cancer risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Multi factorial causality

A

Many types of causal relationships involve diseases with more than one causal factor

Ex: specific exposures, family history, lifestyle characteristics, environmental influences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the two models of multifactorial causality

A

Epidemiological triangle and web of causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Epidemiological triangle

A

Includes 3 major factors- host, agent, environment

Affected by influences such as time, transmission type, and vectors/fomites

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the 4 illustrations of association

A

Scatter plots, dose response curve, epidemic curve, contingency table

17
Q

Scatter plot diagram

A

Closer to the points lie with respect to the straight line of best fit the stronger the association between variable X and Y

18
Q

Dose response curve

A

Type of correlative association between an exposure and an effect

Threshold refers to the lowest dose at which a particular response occurs

19
Q

Epidemic curve

A

Plotting of distribution of case by time of onset, aids in identifying the cause of disease outbreak

20
Q

2x2 contingency table

A

True positive, false positive, true negative, false negative

21
Q
A
22
Q

What are 3 major challenges to validity of study designs

A
  1. Internal validity vs external validity
  2. Error
  3. Bias
23
Q

Internal validity

A

Degree to which a study has used methodological sound procedures

24
Q

External validity

A

Ones ability to generalize the results of the study

25
Q

Error

A

Difference between the value obtained and true value for population

Two general categories: sampling error, non-sampling error

26
Q

Sampling error

A

Variation that occurs because we are studying a sample rather than an entire population. There will always be natural variation between the different sample that are selected

27
Q

What are 4 ways to express sampling error

A

Confidence intervals, standard error, margin of error, coefficient of variance

28
Q

Non-sampling

A

Term for errors that are a result of factors other than using a sample, these result in bias

29
Q

What are 4 common types of bias

A

Recall bias, selection bias, observer bias, confounding

30
Q

Is bias more prevalent in descriptive or analytic studies

A

More prevalent in analytic studies

31
Q

How to control recall bias

A

Aware of limitation when selected study method

32
Q

How to control observer bias

A

Blind or double blind procedures, script, multiple observers

33
Q

How to control selection bias

A

Randomization

34
Q

How to control confounding bias

A

Design phase: think through potential confounders, analysis phase: some types of analysis can control for confounders