EDU ^ Continued Flashcards
Gender and sexual identity in school
UK
Traditionally in the UK, there is a gender binary - you are male or female.
Males are to be masculine, while girls are to be feminine. This is seen as normal and ‘natural’. Schools reinforce this gender binary, encouraging boys and girls to act accordingly.
Gender and sexual identity in school
Examples of how schools reinforce the gender binary:
• Boys are told to “man up”
• Teachers tell boys to stop acting like girls
• Peer pressure - girls tell their friends that they need to look pretty at the school disco
• Male gaze (boys look girls up and down) - girls feel they have to look good e.g. nice hair
• Teachers are stricter on girls if they are rude in class (because it is not feminine)
Gender and sexual identity in school
Ringrose - gender and sexuality in schools
Hegemonic masculinity is encouraged and valued in schools.
Hegemonic masculinity is the idea that men should be dominant, tough, aggressive and misogynistic (hate women). Femininity is devalued; girls are seen as weaker and passive.
Gender and sexual identity in school
Ringrose - gender and sexuality in schools
Affect of hegemonic masculinity
+ statistics
Hegemonic masculinity can become toxic and condone (justify) violence.
It can normalise sexual harassment towards girls (to show they are dominant).
For example, 59% of 13-21 year olds girls have experienced some form of sexual harassment in school or college.
Hegemonic masculinity can also normalise homophobia to prove boys are not girly or ‘gay. For example, 45% of LGBT students have experienced bullying at school for being LGBT. Toxic masculinity refers to the harmful aspects of masculinity e.g. sexually harass women to be superior.
Gender and sexual identity in school
Ringrose - gender and sexuality in schools
Hegemonic masculinity can normalise what according to Ringrose ?
Normalise sexual harassment towards girls (to show they are dominant).
Hegemonic masculinity can also normalise homophobia
Gender and sexual identity in school
Ringrose - gender and sexuality in schools
Examples of sexual harassment in schools:
• Unwanted sexual touching - one third of 16-18 year old girls claim they have experienced unwanted sexual touching at school.
• Unsolicited dick picks - girls are sent dick picks on their phones. They feel ‘provoked’ and don’t know what to do or how to report it.
• Non-consensual sexting - girls are pressured for naked photos. They are seen as a “slut” for being asked.
Gender and sexual identity in school
Ringrose - gender and sexuality in schools
Double standards
Double standards in regards to sexual behaviour. Boys boast about how far they got with a girl. There is a
‘lad culture’ boys are rewarded by other boys for getting with girls, “he’s a lad”. However, when girls have sex, they are blamed (e.g. “she asked for it”) and labelled as “sluts” or “slags”.
Gender and sexual identity in school
Ringrose - gender and sexuality in schools
Double standards-what does Ringrose claim?
Ringrose claims that schools dismiss sexual violence e.g. ban mobile phones or block social media sites on school computers. Schools do not want anything to do with sexual harassment and cases are not dealt with.
Ringrose argues that this confirms toxic masculinity - it keeps happening and girls continue to be sexually harassed
Ethnicity and achievement
Uk trends
There are strong patterns in relation to ethnicity and educational achievement.
In the UK, Chinese and Indian students achieve the best outcomes (grades) and highest progress 8 scores of any ethnic group. Whereas, Black Caribbean and Gypsy/ Roma and Irish Traveller students have the lowest attainment outcomes of all ethnic groups.
External factors of impact of ethnicity on a student’s educational performance
External factors
- Material deprivation
2.Cultural deprivation - Family structure
- Language barriers
- Discrimination in wider society
External factors of impact of ethnicity on a student’s educational performance
External factors
Material deprivation
Some ethnic groups, such as Black Caribbean, are disproportionately eligible for Free School Meals (FSM), facing high levels of poverty and deprivation. Low attainment outcomes of Black Caribbean students may stem from material deprivation. They cannot afford to buy the things needed for educational success. Their families often work in low paid jobs with no job security e.g. zero hours contracts.
External factors of impact of ethnicity on a student’s educational performance
External factors
Examples of material deprivation
• They cannot afford a computer or internet access at home, which makes it hard to complete homework.
• They will likely have to wear a second-hand school uniform, which could lead to bullying from other students, resulting in them skipping school to avoid the bullies.
• They cannot afford to eat breakfast, making it difficult to concentrate in lessons.
External factors of impact of ethnicity on a student’s educational performance
External factors
Material deprivation -opposing view
On the other hand, Chinese and Indian students are more likely to be non-FSM, coming from well-off middle class families with economic capital. They can afford to buy the things for educational success e.&. internet/computer at home to complete homework, new school uniform, good diet and housing conditions.
External factors of impact of ethnicity on a student’s educational performance
External factors
EVALUATION
Material deprivation
• The government has introduced compensatory education - extra services and programs to help children from disadvantaged backgrounds achieve at school. E.g. Breakfast clubs and Free School Meals.
• Poverty and deprivation fails to explain the achievement of Chinese students on FSM who, despite coming from low income families, outperform non-SM students (have economic capital. This suggests coming from low income achievement may stem from cultural factors, rather than material factors.
External factors of impact of ethnicity on a student’s educational performance
External factors
Cultural deprivation
Some ethnic groups, like the Gypsy/Roma and Irish Traveller community, regard education as less important, it is not valued and student outcomes (grades) are lower.
External factors of impact of ethnicity on a student’s educational performance
External factors
Cultural deprivation
Which ethnicity do not generally value an education system ?
The Gypsy/Roma and Irish Traveller community generally do not value an education system run by non-gypsies.
They tend to see education as unimportant because success at school is not necessary to achieve their goals. The main priority of Gypsy/Roma and Traveller boys is to find a manual job and earn a living e.g. tarmac drives, sell horses - these jobs don’t require qualifications. Gypsy/Roma and Traveller girls’ main priority is to look good and find a husband. They will be housewives and mothers, which again does not require qualifications.
External factors of impact of ethnicity on a student’s educational performance
External factors
Cultural deprivation
Which ethnicity do value an education system ?
On the other hand, Chinese and Indian families see education as important and their children go on to achieve above-average results. Most are middle class, possessing cultural capital e.g. parents’ take a real interest in their children’s education and attend all school events including parents’ evenings. British Chinese culture places high value on education and there is a family discourse whereby children work hard for their family. Parents provide lo’ of support and work long hours to pay for private tutoring, revision guides, laptops etc. Indian parents tend to be strict, expecting their children to be obedient and follow their rules. The adult authority model and strong work ethic at home matches the expectations at school.
External factors of impact of ethnicity on a student’s educational performance
External factors
Family structure- who argues this point?
Sewell
External factors of impact of ethnicity on a student’s educational performance
External factors
Family structure-
Sewell argues that one reason why Black Caribbean boys do less well than Black Caribbean girls is because they lack a male role model; many Black Caribbean children live in female-headed single parent families.
Sewell claims that the lack of a male role model makes it harder for some boys to adapt to the demands of school. Whereas, Black Caribbean girls often do better at school because their single mum provides a positive female role model - they want to be independent like their mums, motivating them to study hard.
External factors of impact of ethnicity on a student’s educational performance
External factors
Language barriers
Some students, such as Bangladeshi and Pakistani, do not hear English spoken at home because they are EAL (English as an additional language). This can be a barrier to success, as they cannot understand their teachers, read textbooks or write competently in English. Parents who do not speak English struggle to support their children e.g. cannot understand what the teachers are saying at parents’ evening.
Being EAL also makes the school application process difficult, as parents cannot read the application forms, resulting in many EAL pupils ending up in less popular schools.
External factors of impact of ethnicity on a student’s educational performance
External factors
Language barriers
What is EAL?
English as an Additional Language
External factors of impact of ethnicity on a student’s educational performance
External factors
Language barriers
What do schools use that make it difficult for EAL students to understand content ?
Schools also use the elaborated code - EAL students may find it difficult to understand this complex, sophisticated language e.g. do not understand textbooks, exam questions or what the teachers are saying in lessons.