Chapter 6 class (exam2) Flashcards
Evolution of antipredator Behavior is influenced by..
1)
2)
3)
- Predators normally encountered
a. Specific defense for a major predator
b. General defense for several equally effective predators - Predator effectiveness
a. Defenses that slightly raise predator costs in time, energy, or danger can be effective - Cost to prey of various defenses
Moose-Wolf interactions
131 Observed moose-wolf interactions | 11 saw wolves and left
120 Wolves detected moose | 24 moose stood at bay when wolves approached
96 moose ran when wolves approached | 43 moose escaped
53 wolves caught up to moose | 12 moose stood at bay
41 moose continued to run when wolves caught up | 34 moose ran our outlasted wolves
7 moose were attacked | 1 moose wounded by escaped
6 moose were killed (5% of those detected)
Making detection more difficult - a few ways A) B) C) D)
A) Cryptic coloration, Disruptive coloration
B) Cryptic behavior (active when predators are not)
C) Group formation (safer in a group of prey than alone)
D) Removing evidence of presence (caterpillar that chews stem of leaf so leaf falls to ground. Skipper caterpillar ejects poo from body to deter attack.)
Cryptic coloration
matches background
i.e. cuddle fish or tiger
Disruptive coloration
bold patterns break up body outline (stripes/spots/fawn)
Making attack less likely: A) B) C) D) E) F)
A) Staying near cover: predators and prey ignore each other outside prey’s defensive distance
B) Building a barricade
C) Warning (aposematic) coloration
D) mimicry (Batesian, Mullerian)
E) bodyguards
F) advertise unprofitability (i.e. stotting)
Batesian mimicry
When an edible species resembles a distasteful or dangerous one
owl can make a noise like a rattlesnake. fly that can make jumping like a spider
aposematic
warning coloration often used by noxious organisms to signal their unpalatability to potential predators
mullerian mimicry
two or more distasteful or dangerous species resemble each other
signal deception hypothesis
when a prey’s appearance or behavior activates escape behavior on the part of the predator
antiambush hypothesis
gazelles stot to look for other predators that may be laying in wait
Making Capture more Costly
- scare tactics (false eye spots, etc.)
- group formation
- speed
Making Consumption less likely
- fighting back
group defense
vs
individual defense
often involves chemical defenses like poison, stings, sprays/secretions (i.e. skunk)
misdirecting attack
disguising the head with eye spots, posture, false heads may allow time for escape.
attract competing predators (rabbits scream) to cause conflict