Chapter 12 class (exam4) Flashcards
Eusocial (caste-forming) Insects
complex social groups, specialized functions, and workers never reproduce, a form of altruism and nest helping
A) Darwin (1859)
B) V. C. Wynne-Edwards (1962)
C) William D. Hamilton (1964)
A) Darwin (1859): Individual characteristics competed for selection
B) V. C. Wynne-Edwards (1962): Group selection explained altruism (survival of the species).
C) William D. Hamilton (1964): Individual sacrifice offsets any lost personal reproduction by helping relatives that share the same genes
Darwin (1859)
Individual characteristics competed for selection
V. C. Wynne-Edwards (1962)
Group selection explained altruism (survival of the species).
William D. Hamilton (1964)
Individual sacrifice offsets any lost personal reproduction by helping relatives that share the same genes
Direct Selection
Personal Reproduction = personal fitness
Indirect Selection
improved reproduction of kin (caused by altruism)
inclusive fitness
- direct and indirect selection
- gene propagation in offspring (due to parent action not others help) + nondescendants surviving (due to altruist effort)
Original Kin Selection
offspring due to parental care and indirect selection
A) r = coefficient of…
B) reflects #…
A) coefficient of relatedness.
B) reflects # of meiotic events separating individuals or probability of possessing an allele by common descent.
r = .5
parent-child, sibling
r = .25
nephew, neice, half-siblings, grandparents, grandchildren, aunts, uncles
r = .125
cousins, great grandparents
Hamilton’s Rule
to favor altruism, any loss of offspring must be more than offset by the resultant gain in the survival of relatives or:
r * Benefit > Cost
(r * offspring + rkin w/ helping) > (roffspring + r*kin w/o)
[controversial] Multi-level Selection (David Sloan Wilson)
A recent variation combining individual and group selection saying that:
o Genes in an individual compete for selection
o Individuals in a group compete
o Groups in a population compete
o Populations compete
o Multispecies communities compete
o Ecosystems compete
o (many different levels of competition being considered here)
Hymenoptera (ants, bees, wasps) genders
A) female:
B) males:
A) diploid, fertilized eggs, duplicate chromosomes
B) haploid, unfertilized eggs, single chromosomes
Genetic relatedness in Hymenoptera (vs. normal):
A) father/son (normal, Hymenoptera) B) Father/daughter C) mother/son D) mother/daughter E) brother/brother F) brother/sister G) sister/sister
A) father/son: normal 50% | Hymenoptera 0%
B) Father/daughter: normal 50% | Hymenoptera 50%
C) mother/son: normal 50% | Hymenoptera 50%
D) mother/daughter: normal 50% | Hymenoptera 50%
E) brother/brother: normal 50% | Hymenoptera 50%
F) brother/sister: normal 50% | Hymenoptera 25%
G) sister/sister: normal 50% | Hymenoptera 75% (most closely related)
Problems with Haplodiploid Hypothesis
- termites are..
- many social insect colonies have…
- naked mole rats…
- many eusocial insect queens…
- Termites are diploid and as social as eusocial Hymenoptera, so haplodiploidy is not essential to the evolution of eusociality. Also, many Hymenoptera are solitary
- Many social insect colonies have several queens. This greatly increases the variance between workers and female reproductives
- Naked Mole Rats, diploid mammals, have a “queen” and several kings.
- Many eusocial insect queens mate more than once, causing greater variance in daughter relatedness. Eusociality evolved 8 different times in Hymenoptera, starting with monogamous queens each time. (Thus, it began with the genetic advantage)
Sociogenomic research finds that eusociality and caste developed due to…
Sociogenomic research finds that eusociality and caste developed due to changes in different genes in different species