Bowlbys Maternal Deprivation +Types of ATTACHMENTS Flashcards
Who created strange situation test
Ainsworth + Witting
what were the 4 main factors being tested in the S.S
1)stranger anxiety
2) separation anxiety
3) secure base concept
4)Reunion behaviour
What were the 8 episodes of the strange situation
1) Mother + infant play
2)child Explore room/ play , parent sits
3)Stranger enters, talks to mother
4)Parent leaves, stranger comforts
5)Parent re enters, stranger leaves
6)2nd separation, baby is alone
7)Stranger returns, comforts
8)Parent 2nd reunion
What are the 3 types of attachment
1) Secure
2) Insecure avoidant
3) Insecure resistant
qualities of Secure Attachment
-High stranger anxiety
-High separation anxiety
-use mother as secure base
-Positive reunion behaviour
qualities of insecure avoidant attachment style
-Low stranger anxiety
-low separation anxiety
- Don’t use mother as secure base (independent)
-Neutral reunion behaviour
qualities of insecure resistant attachment type
-Very high separation anxiety
-Very high stranger anxiety
-Don’t use mother as secure base (CLINGY)
-Seek + reject reunion behaviour
what type of study was Strange situation?
Lab study
what did Van Ijzendoornn and Kroonenberg (1988) do
completed Meta - analysis on 32 studies using Ainsworths strange situation
what is a meta-analysis
a summary piece of research which looks at a range of similar studies, analysing for one particular factor e.g: attachment type in s.s on tour
What was the modt common attachment type found in the S.S on tour
%
Secure 50-75%
What 2 countries had the highest percentage of secure attached children
Great Britain
Sweden
Which country had the highest percentage of insecure avoidant children
%
Germany 35 %
which country had the most insecure resistant children
Israel 35%
what is the second most common type of attachment in western culture
insecure avoident
what is the second most common type of attachment in Non- western culture
insecure resistant
What are the consequences of maternal deprivation according to Bowlby
Effects
-emotional development
-Intellectual development
How does maternal deprivation effect Intellectual development
-Abnormally low IQ
-Delayed development
How does maternal deprivation effect Emotional development
-Problematic
-difficult to form relationships
-Causes Affectionless Psychopathy
what is Affectionless Psychopathy
-Inability to experience guilt
-Inability to experience strong emotions to others- empathy
-prevents normal relationships and is associated with criminality
What belief makes bowlby’s maternal deprivation theory too deterministic?
If mother is absent for prolonged period of time then the psychological damage is inevitable
2 positives of bowlby’s maternal deprivation theory
(+)R.S. Bowlby’s 44 thieves
(+) R.S Harlow monkeys
3 problems with Bowlby’s maternal deprivation theory
(-) Problem with Bowlby’s research. Researcher bias.
(-)Problem with Harlow’s research. cross species validity
(-) Rutter says Bowlby’s definitions are muddled
Aim of 44 thieves study Bowlby
To investigate effects of maternal deprivation on people in order to see whether delinquents have suffered deprivation
Method of Bowlby’s 44 thieves study
Interviewed 44 adolescents referred to a child protection programme in London due to steeling. Another control group of 44 children referred due to emotional problems and hadn’t committed a crime.
parents and child interviewed
Both groups asked if suffered maternal deprivation
and assessed for affectionless psychopathy
results of Bowlby’s 44 thieves study
More than half of juvenile thieves had been separated for longer than 6 months during first 5 yrs of life. only 2 in control group had.
32% of young thieves showed affectionless psychopathy. only 2 in control group had.
Why was Bowlbys 44 thieves study les valid. 3 reasons
Bowl by himself carried out the interviews. Experimenter Bias
Retrospective data
Correlation, not causation
Strange situation 5 behaviours used to judge attachment
Proximity
Exploration and secure base
Separation anxity
stranger anxiety
Reunion behaviour
Sample of Ainsworths study
103 infants
Findings of Ainsworths study
Distinc patterns in ways infants behaved
Secure = 60 - 75%
insecure avoidant = 20-25%
insecure resistant = 3% British Todlers
Also found the qualities of these types (on other FC)