Biostat Flashcards

1
Q

number of groups: 1
type of data: parametric tests (data has normal distribution)

A

One-sample t-test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

number of groups: 1
type of data: non-parametric tests (data has skewed distribution)

A

sign test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

number of groups: 1
type of data: discrete/categorical

A

chi-square test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

number of groups: 1 (with before & after measures)
type of data: parametric tests (data has normal distribution)

A

dependent/paired t-test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

number of groups: 1 (with before & after measures)
type of data: non-parametric tests (data has skewed distribution)

A

Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

number of groups: 1 (with before & after measures)
type of data: discrete/categorical

A

Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

number of groups: 2 (treatment & control)
type of data: parametric tests (data has normal distribution)

A

Independent/Unpaired student t-test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

number of groups: 2 (treatment & control)
type of data: non-parametric tests (data has skewed distribution)

A

Mann-Whitney (Wilcoxon Rank-Sum) test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

number of groups: 2 (treatment & control)
type of data: discrete/categorical

A

Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test
Mann-Whitney (Wilcoxon Rank-Sum) test may be preferred for ordinal data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

number of groups: >3
type of data: parametric tests (data has normal distribution)

A

ANOVA (or F-test)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

number of groups: >3
type of data: non-parametric tests (data has skewed distribution)

A

Kruskal-Wallis test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

number of groups: >3
type of data: discrete/categorical

A

Kruskal-Wallis test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

correlation

A

used to determine if one variable changes, or is related to another variable. correlation does not prove causal relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Regression

A

describe a relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables

1) linear regression for continuous data
2) logistic regression for categorical data
3) cox regression for categorical data in a survival analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

sensitivity

A

A/(A+C) x 100
look in notes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Specificity

A

D/(A+D) x 100
look in notes

17
Q

Intention-to-treat

A

all patients originally allocated for each treatment group

18
Q

per protocol

A

only pts who completed the study according to the protocol

19
Q

clinical trials can be analyzed two different ways

A

Intention-to-treat
per protocol

20
Q

two types of trial

A

equivalence- new tx is roughly the same as old tx
– these trails test for effect int wo directions for higher or lower effectiveness (two-way margin)

non-inferiority trails- new tx is no worse than the current standard based on the predefined non-inferiority (delta) margin. delta margin is minimal difference in effect between the two groups is considered clinically acceptable based on previous research

21
Q

forest-plots

A

generally in meta-analysis
provide CI for difference data or ratio data
– boxes: effect estimate from single study shown
– diamond: at bottom show pooled results form multiple studies
– horizontal lines: confidence intervals, longer lines less reliable
– vertical solid line: is no effect line. significant benefit shown if it falls left of line, right of line is significant harm. verticle line is set for zero for difference data or one for ratio data

22
Q

cohort study

A

compares outcomes of a group of pt exposed and not exposed to a tx
follows boths groups prospectively (in the future)

limitations: time-consuming, expensive, can be influenced by confoundets (other factors that affect outcomes…smoking, lipid levels, etc.)

23
Q

cross-sectional survey

A

estimates a relationship between variable and outcomes prevalence in one particles time in a defined population

24
Q

case report/ case series

A

singe patient case report or few patients case series… describes adverse reaction

25
Randomized controlled trial (RCT)
radominzed...equal chances - double-blind - single-blind - open label
26
crossover RCT
group 1- tx a then b group 2 tx b then a
27
factorial design
randomized to more than two groups to test number of experimental conditions
28
meta-analysis
combines results form multiple studies in order to develop a conclusion that has greater statistical power
29
systematic review
summary of clinical literature, on specific topic or question
30
incremental cost ratio
(c2-c1)/(E2-E1)
31
cost-minimization analysis
CMA- when two or more interventions have demonstrated equivalence in outcomes and the cost of each intervention are being compared. demonstrated or assumed to be equivalent in comparative groups- outcome unit
32
cost-benefit analysis
comparing benefit and cost of an intervention in terms of monetary unit dollars- outcome unit
33
cost-effective analysis
clinical effects, two or more interventions to the respective costs natural units (life-years gained, mmHg blood pressure, % at treatment goal)- outcome unit
34
types of medical studies from more reliable to less
systematic reviews and meta-analysis randomized controlled trials cohort studies case-control studies case series and case reports expert opinion
34
cost-utility analys
quality-of-life component of morbidity assessments, using common health indices, QALYs, (quality-adjusted life years), DALYs (disability-adjusted life years) QALY or other utilities- outcome unit
34
case-control study
comparies pt w/ disease (case) to those w/out (control). retrospectively limitations: cause and effect cannont be reliably determined