🟢 Biopsychology - Lateralisation & Split Brain Flashcards

1
Q

What is the corpus collosum

A

Structure between the 2 hemispheres, allows communication between the left and right hemisphere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is split brain research

A

Research on people who have had their brain split in half - severing the corpus callosum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is lateralisation

A

The idea that the 2 halves of the brain are functionally different

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who carried out famous studies on split brain

A

Sperry and Gazzaniga in the late 1960s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sperry (1968) AIM

A

to examine the effects of disconnecting the brains 2 hemispheres on people’s behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sperry (1968) METHOD

A
  • 11 participants, natural experiment
  • hemispheres all disconnected by severing Corpus Callosum
  • apparatus used which could present information to 1 hemisphere
  • sat at table, visual stimuli presented to 1 hemisphere
  • screen divided L+R visual fields and stimuli projected for 1/10th second too fast for any eye movements
  • test on vision, emotion, olfaction, consciousness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sperry (1968) RESULTS

A
  • disconnecting the hemispheres does not affect participants ordinary behaviour, intelligence or personality
  • it does affect short term memory, orientation and fatigue
  • shows hemispheres have different abilities and functions
  • one hemisphere doesn’t know what the other has seen or felt
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Sperry (1968) CONCLUSION

A

SUPPORTS LATERALISATION

the 2 hemispheres have different functions and that split brain patients have ‘divided consciousness’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sperry (1968) EVALUATION

A

✅ highlights difference between 2 hemispheres
✅ provides insight to normal brain functions

❌ natural experiment meaning Sperry could not manipulate which group participants where in and no control group
❌ small sample, rare, limited generalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What hemisphere specialises language

A

Left hemisphere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does the hemisphere specialising in language depend on

A

Handiness,

95% of right handed participants specialised language on left hemisphere

70% left handed participants specialised language on right hemisphere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the Wada test

A

Test to determine which hemisphere in the brain specialises in language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Process of Wada test

A

Anaesthetic injected into carotid artery on one side of the head. ( anaesthetic on one hemisphere).

P then reads aloud but was disrupted 90% of people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Evidence of left hemisphere specialising language, aphasia

A

Language aphasia occurs more as a result of damage to left hemisphere than right hemisphere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Sperry (1968), naked person experiment

A
  • presented naked person to split brain patient’s left visual field
  • Left visual field —- right hemisphere
  • reported that they saw nothing however did smile and giggle, embarrassed
  • suggests right hemisphere is lateralised for emotional language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Evaluation of lateralisation

A

✅ control of extraneous variables in experiments
❌ small sample, not generalise able
❌ difference between 2 hemispheres may have been over emphasised, may have shown demand characteristics, lack ecological validity
❌ more recent research shows right hemisphere couldn’t process even basic language (Turk et al 2002)