Asch (1956) & Sherif (1935), NSI & ISI - SOCIAL INFLUENCE Flashcards
aim of study (Asch 1956)
to investigate the degree to which individuals conform to a majority who gave obviously wrong answers
hypothesis of study (Asch 1956)
when confederates unanimously lie, no. of incorrect answers on critical trials by participants will increase
what was the study designed to show (Asch 1956)
people do not make their own decisions
how did Asch further investigate from his original research (Asch 1956)
changed aspects of the groups and situations
group size (Asch 1956)
3-6 confederates = most persuasive majority
what did conformity fall to with one dissenter
5.5%
difficulty of task (Asch 1956)
more difficult = more conformity
correlation moderated by self-efficacy
participants in Asch’s original research (1956)
123 american male students
number of lines students asked to look at (excl. comparison line) (Asch 1956)
3
number of confederates used in original research (Asch 1956)
5
what were ‘critical trials’ (Asch 1956)
confederates gave identical wrong answers
number of trials each participant took part in (Asch 1956)
18
number of critical trials each participant took part in (Asch 1956)
12
% of times the naive participant gave wrong answer (Asch 1956)
36.8%
% of participants who conformed at least once (Asch 1956)
75%
% if participants who conformed on 6 or more of the 12 critical trials (Asch 1956)
50%
% of participants conformed on all 12 critical trials (Asch 1956)
5%
error rate of control group (without confederates) (Asch 1956)
0.04% - showed how obvious correct answers were
conclusions (Asch 1956)
- judgements affected by majority opinions, even when obviously wrong
- differences between individuals in amount affected by majority opinions
- as most conformed publically, and not privately - suggests motivated by NSI
who introduced the ideas of NSI and ISI
Deutsch and Gerard (1955)
normative social influence
conforming to gain approval/acceptance or avoid rejection
linked to compliance
informational social influence
conforming as you believe others are right/ don’t want to be wrong
linked to internalisation
Sherif (1935) procedure
spotlight in dark room, asked how far it moved in both groups and individually
aim of Sherif (1935)
to compare conformity individually and in groups
results of Sherif (1935)
people tended to conform when in groups and would come to a decision together instead of on their own
supportive research on NSI
Schulz et al (2008)
hotel guests –> towels
guests told 75% previous guests reused towels each day. reduced own towel use by 25%.
showed people shape behaviour to fit in
supportive research on ISI
Wittenbrink and Henley (1996)
people exposed to neg. information about African-Americans (believed it was majority view) later reported more neg. views about a black individual