5.5. Eysenck Criminal Personality Flashcards
What is a way to measure criminal behaviour linked to personality?
Eysenck’s Personality Questionnaire (EPQ)
What does the EPQ do?
Places you along 3 dimensions
What did Eysenck claim?
67% variance of biological traits are innate
Extrovert
Under aroused, seek stimulation more, therefore engage in risk taking behaviour
Neurotic
Over-react and gets upset easily (heat of the moment crimes)
Psychoticism
High testosterone = aggressive- explains high number of men in prison
What is this further linked to?
Immediate gratification
What did Eysenck state offenders usually are?
Developmentally immature- they cannot wait- childish
The criminal personality
High extrovert and high neurotic
What can’t people with the criminal personality be?
Conditioned = hard to re-educate during rehabilitation
How are people with the criminal personality more likely to react?
Anti-socially- they’re unable to learn anxiety responses to anti-social impulses
Strength: comparing prisoners’ scores
- Eysenck compared 2070 male prisoners’ score using the EPQ with 2433 male controls
- Prisoners scores had higher E,N and P scores than controls
- This backs up the predictions that offenders rate higher than the average across the three dimensions than the average
Weakness: Farrington meta analysis
- Revealed that offenders scores high on P but not on E + N
- Implies some of the central assumptions of the criminal personality are incorrect (Eysenck said the criminal personality was high E+N)
Weakness: Moffit
- Distinguished between offending behaviour that only occurs in adolescence and those that continue into adulthood
- She found a reciprocal process between the individual’s personality traits and the environmental reactions
- This implies explaining offenders behaviour is a lot more complex and considers nurture rather than just nature.
Weakness: theory based on personality being consistent
- The theory is based on personality being consistent, however personality is dependent on the situation
- Mischel asked family, friends and strangers to rate 63 students in a variety of situations and found almost no correlation between traits displayed.
- Any regularity of behaviour is likely to be due to the fact we often tend to be in similar situations.