5.2 key theoretical explanations for spatial variations crimes and disorder Flashcards
who came up with social disorganisation theory
shaw and mcckay 1942
social disorganization states statistical concentration of young offenders in
- statistical concetration of young offenders in ZONE IN TRANSITION
what are 3 key elements of social disorgansiation theory
- low socio-econpmic status neighbourhoods
- high resident turnover
- ethnic and cultural heterogenity
in social disorgansiation theory - a weak civic institution is because of
no common value system
in social disorgansiation theory - lack of participation and social trust creates
low social controls
social disorgansiation theory - why are young poeple congregating and socialising in public spaces
- lack of parental surveillance
in social disorganisation theory the environemnt encourages flourishing of what?
why?
flourishing of criminal subcultures
- young people not socialised into conformist values and exposed to deviant norms
what are key criticsms of social disorganisation theory
-focus on official definitions of crime and usual supsects
- self fulliing prophecies due to bias of police and courts
- over-deterministic
- some high crime areas have strong social ties and evidence of organsiation
whos theory is collective effiacy
robert sampson
what process is collective effiacy
the process of activating or converting social ties among neighbourhood residents in order to achieve collective goals such as public order or control of crime
in collective efficacy strong social networks/ ties are insufficent for social control instead the residents must be..
residents must be willing to intervene
collective efficacy is fostered by conditions of what between residents
social cohesion and trust
in collective efficacy what happens before escale and cooperate with police
use of public space and intervene in incidents + solve disputes/ crises before escalate to police
communities with higher measured rates of collective efficacy have what
lower rates of violence
whos theory is routine activty theory
cohen and felson 1979
what 2 theories make up routine activities theory
rational choice and opportunity theory
what do offenders do routine activities theory
weigh up risks, efforts and likely rewards
in routine activities theory what shapes OPPORTUNITIES for offending
social and economic environments