1.3 the ecology of fear and the smart city Flashcards
who came up with the concept of ecology of fear
mike davis - radical urban geographer
how does the ecology of fear replace the pessimistic exclusionary social reaction to problems of crime in 1980/90s
with more optimistic and inclusive visions of urban growth and progress articulated by chicago school
examples of possible solutions to problems of using emergent technlogies by smart cities
- social media
- drone surveillance
- advanced computing
- AI
what stage is criminological work for smart cities in
early stage
what do smart cities seek to qualify the unbridled enthusiams and self promotion of what?
THINK TANKS and COMMERCIAL TECH FIRMS for technological solutions
what does early criminoloical work on smart city draw upon the longstanding idea of what systems ?
SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS
what are sociotechnical systems (technology) understood as a product of?
-technology is understood as a PRODUCT OF HUMAN RELATIONS that RESHAPES these human relations in UNPREDICTABLE ways
how are sociotechnical systems often used?
what race?
they are often used BACK AGAINST OFFICIALS by more IMAGINATIVE OFFENDERS in ARMS RACE between organisers and preventers of serious crimes
example of arms race between organisers and preventers of serious crime
wire tapping counter surveillance technologies by crim organisations to listen into police communcations and subvert law enforcement
example of new opportunities of the smart city for crime
fraud, extortion, protection rackets using ransomware to hack into
- online bank accounts
- internet enabled household energy
- security system s
cyber attacks on critical infrasturtcue by hostile powers as well as crim enterprises e.g. wanna cry ransomware attack on NHS
what caused the demise of the american dream?
- crisis of urban progress
- new spatial struggles
- new patterns of conflict
when was the demise of the american dream and reemergence of dangerous city
1960-70s
what caused a crisis of urban progress in america?
- riots in mid 1960s in inner city neighbourhoods
- reemergence of concern about danger of urban populations for social order
- reignition of urban unrest
- increasing trends in officially recorded volume crime
- deteroriation between BAME and the white police
what where were BAME populations in 1960s not beneffiting from?
where did they remain?
- not benefiting from upward mobility and outward migration predicted by chicago school ecology
- remained in low income, increasingly casualised employment
- kept them in cheaper but more congested and blighted accomodation in inner city
what were the zones in transition for BAME labelled instead
ZONES OF STAGNATION
- stalled personal and collective progress
what was the problem with high rise flats that replaced slum housing
- poor quality of construction
- vulnerable to damp and decay
- removed the DEFENSIBLE SPACE
- replaced with poorly lit passageways ideally designed for robbery and assault
what is defensible space
- opportunities for surveillance and informal social controls afforded by low rise terraced housing
how was sense of stagnation accentuated in 1980s?
what happened?
gentrification trend
- young upwardly mobile professionals tired of commuting into offices, choosing to move back into and upgrade housing in inner cities
- caused inflation for children of low income households
what are young upwardly mobile predominantly white and college educated professionals nicknamed
YUPPIES
what did low income households with wealthy neighbours which leisure centres began to cater for their more expensive tastes ignoring the lower income households feel
relative deprivation
what did the struggle for ownership and use of space in inner city neighbourhoods provide the ideal conditions for?
the CRIME WAVE in personal and property offences
- reigniting fears about inner city as dangerous place to live and work