WW1 Flashcards

1
Q

What were the effects of the Franco-Prussian War in 1871?

A

Treaty of Frankfurt 1871

German Troops would remain in Germany until 200 M Euros would be paid

Alsace Lorraine was given to Germany

This caused France to hate Germany for decades to come

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why did Bismarck punish France in the way that they did?

A

Bismarck thought that this war would make France and Germany undisputable enemies

Therefore they decided to weaken France as much as possible

A good case could be made for Alsace because it had a large German industry

But Lorraine was used just to weaken Germany

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

“The Next 100 Years” George Friedman Pg 1?

A

“ Indeed, European interdependence due to trade and investment was so great that serious people were claiming that war had become impossible – and if not impossible, would end within weeks of beginning – because global financial markets couldn’t withstand the strain. ”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

“The War that Ended Peace” Margaret Macmillan?

A

“The century since the end of the Napoleonic Wars had been the most peaceful era since the fall of the Roman Empire. In the first years of the Twentieth Century Europe believed it was marching to a golden, happy, and prosperous future. But instead, complex personalities and rivalries, colonialism and ethnic nationalisms, and shifting alliances helped to bring about the failure of the long peace and the outbreak of a war that transformed Europe and the world.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the Criticisms of Blaming Imperialism as the cause of WW1?

A

Prior to WWI, there had been several conflicts between the Great Powers over colonial possessions.

However, these conflicts did not all lead to war. Britain and France were bitter rivals in North Africa and nearly went to war in 1898, but these disputes were usually settled.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Long-Term Causes of WW1 – Trade and Markets?

A

Throughout the C19th, Britain, France, Germany, the USA, parts of the Austrian Empire, and later, Italy and Russia, all experienced considerable growth in industry, with more and more people dependent on the production and export of manufactured goods.
Access to raw materials and the ability to sell goods overseas were important.
There is no doubt that desire for economic gain could incite war. Japan and Russia clashed over Manchuria in 1904. The Great Powers ‘scrambled’ for Africa from the 1870s and this led to the Boer War in 1899.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Long-Term Causes of WW1 – Trade and Markets?

A

Throughout the C19th, Britain, France, Germany, the USA, parts of the Austrian Empire, and later, Italy and Russia, all experienced considerable growth in the industry, with more and more people dependent on the production and export of manufactured goods.
Access to raw materials and the ability to sell goods overseas were important.

There is no doubt that desire for economic gain could incite war. Japan and Russia clashed over Manchuria in 1904. The Great Powers ‘scrambled’ for Africa from the 1870s and this led to the Boer War in 1899.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Militarism as Long Term Causes of WW1?

A

After 1870, nearly all the European powers increased the size of their armies, the sophistication of their weapons, and the technology used to wage war on land and sea. Developments in transport. Every country had ‘war plans’.

The peoples of Europe were proud of their armed forces, and the growth of mass nationalism often went hand in hand with increasing militarisation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Alliance and Treaties as a Long Term Cause of WW1?

A

Imperial rivalry, economic pressure for more markets, militarism, and nationalism all led to feelings of hostility between countries and contributed to the build-up of tensions.

However, what linked all this together was the network of alliances that emerged from the late C19th

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Consequences of the Morrocan Crisis 1905?

A

Germany was now seen as the key threat to British interests.

Germany had not gained notable concessions in North Africa, which was a failure for Weltpolitik and national pride.

Germany had not undermined the Entente Cordiale but had strengthened it. British foreign policy was now directed at supporting French interests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Consequences of the Agadir Crisis 1911?

A

German public opinion was hostile to the settlement and critical of their government’s handling of the crisis, which was another for the policy of Weltpolitik.

The entente between Britain and France was again strengthened. Naval negotiations between the two began in 1912 and Britain made a commitment to defend France by 1913.

There was increased tension and hostility between Germany and Britain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Russo-Turkish War, 1877-8

A

Russia went to war against the Ottoman Empire in 1877, following Ottoman suppression of uprisings in Herzegovina (1875-8) and Bulgaria (1876), and war between the Ottomans and Serbia and Montenegro
Russia won a decisive victory.

The Treaty of San Stefano, signed in March 1878, recognised the independence of Romania, Serbia and Montenegro, and created a large Principality of Bulgaria as an autonomous vassal of the Ottoman Sultan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the Congress of Berlin 1878?

A

The Great Powers, including Austria-Hungary, Britain and France, were alarmed at Russia expanding its sphere of influence

Russia had made secret agreements with Austria-Hungary prior to entering the war, whereby the latter would get Bosnia and Herzegovina in return for neutrality, but the size of the new Principality of Bulgaria was alarming

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How did the Congress of Berlin 1878 possibly lead to WW1?

A

Most of the participants at Berlin were not fully satisfied and problems remained

Russia was humiliated, the results of its victory in war effectively negated, and Austria-Hungary made gains instead (although this angered South Slavs and led to tensions in Bosnia and Herzegovina)

Germany had effectively allied itself more closely to Austria-Hungary than Russia, and the Three Emperors’ League, which the Congress had aimed to preserve, collapsed soon after

Serbia, Bulgaria and Greece had all made gains, but less than they felt they deserved

The Treaty of Berlin put the Great Powers’ seal on the decline of Ottoman power in the Balkans, leaving the Ottomans weakened and humiliated

The Treaty was a blow to Pan-Slavism, but it did not solve or remove the problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The Balkans wAR (More needed)

A

Austria was not a nation-state but rather a collection of peoples and regions that owed allegiance to the Habsburg emperor.
This was also the case with the various other European empires, but with one crucial difference…
Another difference was that Austria had lost more of its empire in the C19th than any other of the Great Powers. In 1815, the Habsburg monarchy dominated Germany and Italy, as well as having control of much of south-east Europe.
In 1859-60, Italy was lost in a war waged against France and the northern Italian kingdom of Piedmont.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Consequences of the Balkans War?

A

Austria saw Serbia as a threat and an enemy
Russia had not directly backed Serbia, but with the defeat of Bulgaria, it was necessary to maintain good relations with Serbia in order to keep influence in the Balkans.

Serbia resented having to give up its gains and create Albania, so nationalist feelings in Serbia against Austria ran high.

Austria approached Germany for support against Serbia and, if necessary, Russia and the idea had been planted that this was a possibility.

17
Q

Why did Austria declare War?

A

The preservation of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

The reliance on the Triple Alliance and links with Germany.

The belief that Austria could manage a quick, decisive victory.

The influence of military power and military planning.

The desire to prevent Serb nationalism from spreading.

The willingness of its statesmen to take risks.

18
Q

Why Did Russia mobilise?

A

National feeling – support for fellow Slavs in Serbia ran high.

Military power and preparation – Russian military expansion had given its statesmen the confidence to act, and military planning required early mobilisation.

The alliance network, which offered the chance of France and maybe Britain giving support

The need to support the Russian Empire which depended on the prestige of the Tsar.

Humiliation in foreign affairs led to revolution in 1905.
Willingness of Russian leaders to take a risk.

19
Q

Why Did Germany Support Austria?

A

German militarism and nationalism meant there would be enthusiasm and support for war as well as strong military forces to wage that war.

Detailed plans existed, which led to hopes that the war would be quick and decisive as Germany’s wars of the 1860s had been.

The security of the German Empire seemed to depend on war. Imperialism had increased conflicts with other powers and conquest in Russia may have been considered.

The 1879 Alliance with Austria was a major consideration.

German statesmen took a number of risks.

20
Q

Why Did France mobilise?

A

France had been concerned by Germany’s challenge to its empire.

It had been building up its military power
The French hoped for support through their country’s alliance with Russia and its friendship with Britain.

Nationalism was strong – opinion in France supported the return of Alsace-Lorraine. Irredentism.

Confidence in France’s plan of attack made war a risk worth taking.

21
Q

How was Economics involved in causing the war?

A

Many analyses of the war were produced that blamed economic factors.

For communists such as Lenin, the war was the inevitable outcome of the final stage of capitalism – imperialism – where the capitalist countries of Europe fought for markets and resources.

The Empires of Europe had been expanding in the C19th and this had led to tensions.

Br and Fr nearly went to war in North Africa, Br and Russia were rivals on the north-west frontier of India.
Germany’s attempted economic expansion.

Decline in A-H may have made them more determined to not lose control over the Balkans.

22
Q

Shortcomings of Economic Developments in causing WW1?

A

Imperial conflict certainly existed. However, some of the most difficult areas were between the countries that ended up as allies – Br and Russia, Br and Fr.

Do imperialist ambitions explain events in the Balkans?
Struggle for resources does not explain French desire to take back A-L.

Does this explain the US entry to the war?

Perhaps, instead, the industrial revolution gave countries the means to build up huge stocks of weapons?

23
Q

How did Politics cause the War?

A

There was mass support for war in the growing nationalism that had been a feature in many countries.

Russian support for Slavs, Britain fearing it would appear weak and isolated, Fr’s nationalism and desire to retake A-L

Austria’s fears if it did not take a strong line against Serbia,
Br had problems in Ireland.

Germany concerned with the rise of socialism.
The alliance system could be considered a political cause – fear of loss of prestige?

Balance of power?

24
Q

Shortcomings of Politics in causing the war?

A

Some suggest that the cheering crowds etc had never been a strong influence for elite politicians before – instead their mass support was exploited.

The alliance system should be questioned, too – in many cases it did not bind the nation to come to the aid of the other.

Germany, eg, made a conscious decision to offer the blank cheque, France was not bound to help Russia when it mobilised, Br had no obligation to help France.
However, if Russia had gone to war with Austria could Germany have remained neutral?

Plenty of other nations join the war despite not being part of alliance system

25
Q

Why was fighting most important on the Western Front?

A
  • Because of its size and the length of time it remained an operational theatre of war. It was a continuous battlefield stretching for 320 km from the North Sea to the French-Swiss border in the south. Across this line, the Allies and the Germans attacked each other continuously for four years without significantly breaking the position of the line
  • Because of the key role it played in the outcome of the war
  • Because the fighting on the Western Front was to have a significant impact on idea about and attitudes towards war
26
Q

How was the War fought?

A

Early fighting had shown that defence was easier than attack

Artillery and machine guns, together with rapid-fire magazine rifles, had a devastating effect on attackers

Once trenches and support trenches had been dug, barbed wire established and light railways built to carry more men and supplies, the attack became even more difficult

Large numbers concentrated in a small area

To win, forces had to break through the trench lines, then engage with the enemy, destroy the opposing armies, and move through to take key strategic points to prevent further resistance

27
Q

How did Trench Warfare start?

A
  • Following the Battle of the Marne, Joffre recognized that the campaign was ‘no longer a question of pursuit, but of methodical attack’
  • The British began to dig in on 16th September 1914, thus starting the process of trench warfare
  • It would not end until 21 March 1918
28
Q

What was the most used gun in WW1 for the British?

A

303in, bolt action Lee-Enfield rifle with a magazine that held ten rounds of ammunition; a bayonet could be attached to the end of the rifle for use in hand to hand fighting

29
Q

How did Machine Guns affect the way the war went?

A

The machine gun, however, was far more lethal against mass targets

Whereas an infantryman could fire 25 rounds a minute with a bolt-action rifle, he could fire 600 rounds a minute with a machien gun