IB MOCKS Flashcards

1
Q

Ideology as a cause of WW1?

A

Ideology caused WW1

Example: The pre-eminence of nationalism, which can be seen in the Balkans

The collapse of the Ottoman Empire that began in 1908 + increasing threats to the A-H

–> Increase in Nationalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How did the Balkan Wars lead to WW1 (Ideology)?

A

1st and 2nd Balkan Wars of 1912 and 1913 –> Serbia wanted to become Independent

This led to the assassination of Franz Ferdinand in 1914

It was the expression of Pan-Slavism that allowed this to happen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Criticisms of Ideology as a reason for WW1?

A

Independent magazine 1914

“the financial system of the world is in chaos, that international commerce is suspended, that industries are everywhere demoralized and families ruined.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How did Ideology cause WW2?

A

Hitler’s Nazm was an ideology that prioritised war as a key element, as best evidenced by the foreign policy pursued by the German state through the 1930s in Austria and eventually Poland.

Hitler’s Nazm was based as it was on the expressed desire for Lebernsraum in the East, was a belief system that met its ideological match in both liberal democracy and communism

The ideological underpinning of each war, however, was closely linked to the need for imperial expansion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Compare and Contrast the Ideology of Pan-Slavism and Hitler (Ideology as a cause) WW2?

A

This could not be said of Pan-Slav nationalism in the abstract, whereby the contrast Hitler’s aggressive and radicalise Nazism desired war and expansionism by design

The Second WW2 can therefore more easily be defined as a war between ideologies where WW1 is much harder to define as such

Ideology did indeed paly its role in WW1 , but as part of a much larger collection of disparate causes, rather than as the main cause in and of itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Direct Area of Contrast between Imperialism?

A

Can be seen in the Balkans

A-H concerns in the Balkans seemed to be the maintenance of an existing empire, being torn apart by the various national groups contained within, rather than the aggressive acquisition of territories outside of it.

This, therefore, is a helpful area of contrast- it could hardly be argued that Nazi Germany or Imperial Japan’s imperial ambitions were based around the maintenance of an already existing empire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How did Alliances cause ww1?

A

As a direct consequence of the economic factors, just discussed and the militarism strongly associated with it, events in Sarajevo eventually led to the triggering of both the Triple Alliance and Tiple Entente against each other that started the war in 1914

Turned small –> big

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How did Alliance cause WW2?

A

Similarly, alliances played a role in WW2

Nazi Soviet Pact that gave Hitler the confidence to invade Poland in Sep 1939, knowing that his agreeing with the Soviets avoided the potential threat of war on two fronts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How did Alliance cause WW2?

A

Similarly, alliances played a role in WW2

Nazi Soviet Pact that gave Hitler the confidence to invade Poland in Sep 1939, knowing that his agreeing with the Soviets avoided the potential threat of war on two fronts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Contrasts for Alliance?

A

Time Period and Intentions

Alliances had been in place for decades (in the case of Britain’s guarantee of Belgian neutrality in 1839) or at least several years

Neither seemed to be create with express for War

Nazi-Soviet pact –> war orientated

Similarly, lack of foresight on the part of Germany

In First, this can be seen through the lack of foresight of Belgian neutrality in 1914 and in 1939 through Hitler’s belief that Br and France would continue their policy of appeasement, were he to invade Poland, which has been abandoned in March

Alliances were, therefore, the catalyst for war in both the First and Second World Wars, if not the underlying cause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evidence that WW1 was a total war shown by Women?

A

800K women served in the USSR armed forces

18,0000 women working at radar stations and erecting barrage balloons in Britain

Hastings - “Every nation sought to glamourise the role of women”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Criticisms to evidence that WW1 was a total war shown by Women?

A

Faced discrimination in terms of

wages –> significantly lower than their male counterparts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Was there a total War in Germany as evidenced by the Role of Women?

A

No

refused to mobilise 1/2 of population due to the concerns of male trade unions about pay cuts.

December 1916 ‘Auxiliary service for the Fatherland’ law.

Requiring all adult males between…17 and 60 to perform “war work”’ (Daniel, 1917) ‘ultimately excluded women’ due to trade unionists (Grayzel).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Was there a total War in other European countries due to the role of Women?

A

Women’s paid employment increased by 400,000 in Britain (WWI)

Russian women mobilised ONLY VOLUNTARILY

‘Women such as Flora Sandes and the members of the Russian Women’s Battalions of Death experienced combat first-hand by choice’ (Grayzel)

Women 26% - 43% in workforce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The economy as evidence for a total war in WW2?

A
  • DEFENCE OF THE REALMS ACT 1915: Government could requisition any land or buildings deemed necessary for the war effort.

-Britan’s production of shells increased 1000%.

1914 - Rationing for both sides introduced

  • Ministers and departments took control of economic production, determining production targets, allocating manpower and resources.

War loans were heavily raised.

1916 - Hindenburg and Ludendorff

  • Produced the oberster kriegsmat (Supreme war office) which dictated all war activity, including economy.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Criticisms to Evidence for total war in the economy in WW2?

A

Idea of total war in WW1 could be refuted, as in France, war-time distribution left to groups of privately owned companies, each responsible for own wartime need (ie shells or rifles). This worked in principle, however, not as well as places which did fully nationalise, such as Germany.

17
Q

Evidence for a total war in the economy: WW2

A

1939 - Rationing introduced

50-61% of their total GDP to munitions productions.

Germany ideals of expansion outwards could be fuelled as desire for raw resources.

18
Q

Technology as a sign of Total War: WW1?

A

military developments such as the machine guns (600 round per minute) and heavy artillery (70% of all casualties).

Chemistry – Chemical weaponry was used like chlorine gas and phosgene gas

Tanks were too slow and unreliable to break stalemate – had no effect suggesting there was not total war in regards to use of tanks – however the tanks were in early development at this time so neither power really had any opportunity to use them the same way as they were in ww2. Armour couldn’t resist artillery which has been established as a crucial part of ww1.

War at sea became a major factor for both sides which hadn’t been utilised quite this way before. Ships could cut of food supplies and control of trade routes became essential in regards to resources – total war in this aspect.

Germany used U-boats (submarine attacks) to sink merchant ships. Sea mines were also used on enemy ships along with the development of torpedoes and submarines making large battleships vulnerable unlike before ww1.

Some sinking of ships was done to neutral countries though (USA getting hit and joining the allies changing the war outcome hugely) - neutrals getting pulled into war was relatively uncommon and more countries means more conflict and more war – total war.

Starvation from ships – public of Britain were reduced to only six months’ worth of corn with over 1 million tonnes of shipping lost in 4 months from naval attacks – public struggle from technology – total war.

Aircraft were a recent invention for ww1. Pilots used heavily for scouting and eventually dogfights started taking place which was previously unseen.

Bomb dropping on enemies and resource dropping on allies was common and played a significant role in trench warfare. However, compared to ww2 it was limited and therefore not a total war in the same sense.

19
Q

Criticisms of Technological Developments Total War: WW2

A
  • Too dependent on wind for usage it never made any real impact – not total war in regards to chemical weaponry.
20
Q

Importance of Industrial Power in determining the outcome of the War?

WW2: JAPAN

A

Less industrially advanced

Failed to organise its industrial production fully and allowed women to join the war to late

They were conquered by the US, who had begun preparing for a long-term war by mid-1941 with the Victory Programme when it was not yet involved in the war

21
Q

Importance of Industrial Power in determining the outcome of the War?

WW2: Russia

A

Not industrialised

  • Lack of comprehensive railway –> Could not fully supply the home front
  • They were less equipped than the Germans and Austrian-Hungarians who had very efficient systems due to the proximity of their home front and their front lines(s)

Peasant based economy, only recently came out of serfdom

22
Q

Criticisms of the importance of Industrial Power in determining the outcome of the War?

WW2: Russia

A

However, one could argue they do have technological advancements

they have the access to some of the most advanced oil supplies in the world.

Couldn’t use this effectively

23
Q

Why was the war in the air to a small extent significant in WW1?

A

Military aircraft were used primarily for reconnaissance in WW1

Called ‘scouts’

Also used to supplement land attacks

Example: Middle East - BR + Aus used artillery and then managed to pursue the Turkish at the Battle of Megiddo in 1918

New tech - only used for scouting

24
Q

Criticisms of the argument that the War in the Air was not useful?

A

Can be argued that it was effective

Used the air superiority of 2:1 to photograph German positions at Amien

Allowed the Brits to conceal their attacks and prevented Germany from doing the same

LLoyd George argued in parliaments that having aircraft were so important that the number of aircrafts went from 2:1 –> 5:1