Essay Planning: Italian Unification Flashcards
Give Three Reasons for the Revolution in Italy in 1848?
Peasant Discontent
Nationalism
Liberalism
How did Peasant Discontent cause the Revolution of Italy in 1848?
Peasant Discontent was paramount due to the failure of the Harvests in 1846/1847
This meant that there was a low supply of Wheat meaning that there were soaring prices increasing by 50%
Historian Jonathan Sperber - ‘in the mid-1840s, the high-prices, followed by indebtedness, poor business conditions and widespread-unemployment reflected the poor economic conditions in Europe’
- Continuing fall in agricultural prices since 1815
- Extract from a pamphlet issued in 1847 – “The condition of peasants is appalling. They dig all day just enough to obtain bread and oil”
- February 1848 – Food riots in Lombardy and some land seizures in Tuscany
- Meagre Seasonal Harvest in 1846 and 1847
Give Evidence that Peasant Discontent was short lived in the Revolutions of 1848?
Italian revolutionary movements raised issues that had little interest for most peasants.
Demands for constitutional government, voting and civil rights, and national independence reflected and essentially urban and middle-class agenda. Revolutionary elements that were willing to confront the “Agrarian Question” were a minority everywhere. Peasant support for the revolution waned quickly after March 1848.
How do some Historians try to refute the notion that Peasant Discontent was insignificant?
Why are these refutes wrong?
Some Historians try to refute this argument saying that after March 1848 many peasants served the national cause in the war against Austria as conscripts in the Piedmonts army.
A Significant exception, peasants either dropped out or turned against the revolution most notably so in Venetia, where peasant support was scorned by the revolutionary government and courted by the Austrians.
Give Five Reasons Why the 1848 Revolutions failed?
Foreign intervention
The refusal of the Pope to support the revolutions
Lack of involvement from the masses
Lack of national leadership and aims
How did Foreign Intervention contribute to the failure of the Revolutions of 1848?
Austrian intervention led not only to revolts continuously being crushed but also to the absolutist rule being restored by reinstating previous rulers
Piedmont was Italy’s strongest state and the fact that they couldn’t defeat Austria showed a great failure for the revolutionaries.
In the Austrian battles with both Piedmont and Venetia (where the Austrians surrendered for a short period of time in March 1848) success didn’t last long for the revolutionaries as Austria ultimately returned and crushed the revolutions using their strong military, showing they are clearly a very important reason as to why the 1848 revolutions failed.
Austria’s military power was also shown as they used troops on several occasions to restore previous monarchies that had fled to their thrones. Austria ensured none of the rulers forced to flee were away for long. For example, in Parma & Modena the rulers were restored as well as in Tuscany where Austria restored the Grand Duke who had fled in January 1849. This shows Austria’s great military power affecting all areas of Italy.
What Plebisicte occured in 1860?
By the year 1860 however, a plebiscite in the mainland South demonstrated the majority of people’s desire for unity under Victor Emmanuel, with 1,302,064 voting for amalgamation. This signifies that it was not the lack of interest in unification, but more the inability and inconsistencies present throughout the areas of Italy that resulted in divisions, both socially and politically
Why did the Pope mean that the Revolution of 1848 failed?
Pope Against Unification
Seen by Catholics as God’s representative on Earth
Pope made clear that the unification of the kingdom of Italy were “contrary to God’s wishes”
Establishing an idea meant forming a negative view towards unification amongst much of the nation, posing a challenge in rousing any form of interest in endeavouring to unify the states of the peninsula
Anyone who opposed the Pope was going against the divine cause of protecting the Church and with a high percentage of the population remainingfailthful; this was a very controversial matter
What is Cavour credited with?
Establishing Piedmont as the leading economic power in Italy
- Building good relations with France and Britain so that these two great powers supported Piedmont’s cause
- Defeating Austria
What did Cavour do?
Brought about stability by negotiating an alliance between the centre-left in the assembly and the centre right
Make Italy more liberal and modern
Cavour ended Customs duties with France, Britain, Belgium, and Austria to introduce Free Trade Improved Piedmont’s status and helped its military development
Introduced the National Bank, the forerunner of Italy
Developed Railways and bult the Frejus Rail tunnel (BY 1859, 850/986 KM OF RAILWAY IN ITALY WERE PIEDMONTS) Helped its military development
Piedmont was increasingly admired in British and French governing circles, and this laid the basis for the essential diplomacy that was to lead to unification
Why do Some people downplay Cavour’s significance?
-Cavour’s single minded determination
-France alone would ally with Piedmont in order to defeat Austria
-The emergence of an unstable French Regime that was attracted to the idea of fighting Austria in Italy
What did Mazzini do for Italian Unification?
Spreading Nationalistic and Patriotic ideas was Mazzinis line of duty
With the purpose of changing Italy into a ‘one, independent and free republic’ by a popular uprising he created the Young Italy, a movement that by 1833 consisted of 60,000 members and was spreading towards other countries, eventually creating the Young Europe.
Limitations of the work of Mazzini?
Mazzini believed that the popular revolutions that he had in plans would help to achieve the state of his dreams, but all the following uprisings, e.g. the one in 1834 in Piedmont, organised in co-operation with Garibaldi, ended in failure and Mazzini, once again arrested and with a death sentence, was forced to go into exile to London.
In politics, however, he had some achievements, for during his exiles (1837-1840 and 1850) he gained the British sympathy and support for the case and for himself, which was important, for it gave the Unification the recognition on the international arena.
Historians’ view on Mazzini?
Denis Mach Smith Biography 1994 Mazzini wanted ‘the brotherhood of people’
Many claim that Mazzini’s work was ‘pure fantasy’
Farmer describes him as a ‘doer’ and not merely a ‘thinker’
How did Garibaldi lead to unification?
For Italy, Garibaldi is the ultimate hero.
Took a leading role in attempting to sustain the revolutions of 1848
He was the key reason why Italian unification being not simply a matter for the more developed north of Italy
His daring expedition le to Sicily falling to the nationalists, the invasion of Naples and the historic meeting with Vittore Emanuele
Without this expedition, there would have been no Italy
Garibaldi was the doer, the soldier, the man of action