Hitler and Mao additional knowledge Flashcards
Comparisons and contrasts for ideology in terms of emergence?
Similarities:
- Ideology: grounded in change
–> Mao was a radical shift from the GMD and Hitler was a radical shift from the Weimar
–>
Compare and contrasts terror in the emergence of Mao and Hitler?
Differences:
- Mao emerged to power through a protracted guerrilla warfare campaign, while Hitler rose to power through a combination of political maneuvering and the use of paramilitary organizations such as the SA and the SS.
Similarities:
- Both M H employed paramilitary organizations
- Mao Red Army, a guerrilla force + Hitler (SA)
- Force to intimidate their opponents + create a sense of fear among the population.
- Mao Cultural Revolution + Hitler Jews, Communists
Force (Hitler)
- 1921: (SA) → purpose was to win ‘street battles’ against communists
+ Protect Nazi speakers/members during party meetings AND disrupt the meetings of political opponents
→ Propaganda purpose (ie. demonstrated that the Nazi Party could achieve order + control)
→ Ernst Röhm the SA expanded (Jan 1933: 2,000,000 members → 20 times larger than German Army).
E2: 1923: Hitler and General Ludendorff (supported by 2,000 Nazis) attempted a violent uprising in Munich
→whilst this putsch failed (16 Nazis killed AND Hitler was arrested), it gave the Nazi Party immense fame both domestically + internationally
→ the subsequent trial lasted 24 days and was covered in depth by the media, giving Hitler an opportunity to spread his ideology → also showed he was willing to use force to gain power.
Ideology (Hitler)
Feb 1920: NSDAP + National Socialist Program (‘25-Point Program’)
→ described main ideas of Nazism → nationalism, racialism, anti-Semitism, anti-immigration, anti-communism
→ early Nazism even included socialist ideas (eg. nationalization of businesses; abolition of unearned income)
→ the aim of this ideology was to attract as wide of a support base as possible (ie. across all social classes).
July 1925: Hitler published his autobiographical manifesto ‘Mein Kampf’ (My Struggle)
→ defined Nazism in more detail and in a more accessible format → argued that National Socialism was the only doctrine that
could defeat socialism/communism AND suitably prepare the population for war (needed to gain Lebensraum)
→ 1925-32: 240,000 copies sold (more popular after Hitler rose to power) → still helped spread Nazism.
Perspectives on Ideology (Hitler)
PA: Holborn → Nazi ideology was consistent and continuous and this made it central to Hitler’s rise to power.
PB: Brustein → people voted for Hitler due to his “innovative programs that appealed to material interests”.
R1: there were pragmatic reasons for social groups to support Hitler → working class (pensions/employment);
industrialists (gov. contracts for remilitarisation); landowners/businessmen (elimination of communist threat)
→ ideology sometimes overlapped with pragmatism → the objective of autarky was an element of Nazism →
this was popular for nationalistic + material/economic reasons → gained the support of many social groups.
R2: Nazi ideology was not always consistent (eg. socialist ideas in the ‘25-Point Program’ were abandoned)
→ Mein Kampf was repetitious + illogical → ideology was only effective in winning popular support after the GD
→ 1924-28: NSDAP barely survived (May 1928: 2.6% votes / 12 seats) → from 1929 onwards, the NSDAP
had far greater electoral success (Sep 1930: 18.3% votes / 107 seats → July 1932: 37.4% votes / 230 seats)