September Flashcards
Consider the following statements with reference to Citizenship:
- At present, no country in the world follows the jus soli citizenship system.
- Currently, Indian nationality law follows the jus sanguinis system of citizenship instead of the jus soli system.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
2 only
Explanation :
Countries around the world have established different systems and rules that govern the attribution of citizenship, the major ones being by birth, by naturalization or by marriage. Most countries follow one of the two following systems:
jus soli
jus sanguinis
Jus soli is a Latin term meaning law of the soil. Many countries follow jus soli, more commonly known as birth right citizenship. Under this concept, the citizenship of an individual is determined by the place where the individual was born. So a child of an immigrant is a citizen as long as he/she is born in the country of immigration. The US follows the jus soli system to determine citizenship. Therefore, whoever is born in the US and is subject to its jurisdiction is automatically granted US citizenship. Currently, around 30 countries in the world follow this. So, statement 1 is not correct.
Jus sanguinis is when a person acquires citizenship through descent, i.e. through their parents or ancestors independent of where he/she is born. Traditionally, as evidenced by the Citizenship Act of 1955, citizenship in India was acquired by birth on Indian soil (jus soli) or by descent (the son or daughter of Indian citizens are themselves an Indian citizen, even if they were born abroad). The reforms which took place from 1987 onwards tended to fully replace the old jus soli by a form of jus sanguinis as at least one of the parents had to be born Indian (and after 2003, the other parent should not be considered as illegal at the time of birth). Thus, currently Indian nationality law follows jus sanguinis system of citizenship. So, statement 2 is correct.
In which among the following cases, the Government of India may terminate the citizenship of an Indian citizen?
- A World Bank employee who is an Indian citizen and has been living in another country for the past seven years continuously.
- The citizen has shown disloyalty to the Constitution of India.
- The citizen has, within five years after registration or naturalization, been imprisoned in the USA for three years.
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
2 and 3 only
Explanation :
The Citizenship Act (1955) prescribes three ways of losing citizenship whether acquired under the Act or prior to it under the Constitution, viz, renunciation, termination and deprivation:
By Renunciation: Any citizen of India of full age and capacity can make a declaration renouncing his Indian citizenship. Upon the registration of that declaration, that person ceases to be a citizen of India. However, if such a declaration is made during a war in which India is engaged, its registration shall be withheld by the Central Government. Further, when a person renounces his Indian citizenship, every minor child of that person also loses Indian citizenship. However, when such a child attains the age of eighteen, he may resume Indian citizenship.
By Termination: When an Indian citizen voluntarily (consciously, knowingly and without duress, undue influence or compulsion) acquires the citizenship of another country, his Indian citizenship automatically terminates. This provision, however, does not apply during a war in which India is engaged.
By Deprivation: It is a compulsory termination of Indian citizenship by the Central government, if:
the citizen has obtained citizenship by fraud.
the citizen has shown disloyalty to the Constitution of India. So, statement 2 is correct.
the citizen has unlawfully traded or communicated with the enemy during a war;
the citizen has, within five years after registration or naturalization, been imprisoned in any country for two years. So, statement 3 is correct
the citizen has been ordinarily resident out of India for seven years continuously. However, this will not apply if he’s a student abroad or is in the service of a government in India or an international organization of which India is a member, or has registered annually at an Indian consulate his intention to retain his Indian citizenship. So, statement 1 is not correct.
Consider the following statements with reference to Assam Accord of 1985:
- It was a Memorandum of Settlement (MoS) signed between representatives of the Government of India and the leaders of the Assam Movement.
- According to the Accord, any foreigners who arrived after January 1, 1966, would be identified and may be deported in accordance with the law.
- Clause 6 of the Accord was inserted to safeguard the socio-political rights and culture of the “indigenous people of Assam”.
Which of the statements given above is/are not correct?
2 only
Explanation :
Assam Accord came at the culmination of a movement against immigration from Bangladesh. The Assam Accord was a Memorandum of Settlement signed by the Governments of India and Assam, and the All Assam Students’ Union (AASU) and the All Assam Gana Sangram Parishad (AAGSP) in New Delhi on August 15, 1985. So, statement 1 is correct.
Clause 5 of the Assam Accord deals with the issue of foreigners, that is, detection of foreigners in Assam, deletion of their names from the voters’ list and their deportation through practical means. The foreigners were classified under three heads for identification and differential treatment under Clause 5 of the Assam Accord. Two dates are of significance in the Assam Accord: 1st of January 1966 and 24th of March 1971.
“All persons who came to Assam prior to 1.1.1966, including those amongst them whose name appeared on the electoral rolls used in 1967 elections, shall be regularised,” states Clause 5 of the Assam Accord. In simple words, illegal immigrants who entered Assam till December 31, 1965 were to be granted citizenship with voting rights immediately.
As per the accord, foreigners who came to Assam on or after March 25, 1971 shall continue to be detected, deleted and expelled in accordance with law. Immediate and practical steps shall be taken to expel such foreigners. So, statement 2 is not correct.
Clause 6 of the Assam Accord says that constitutional, legislative and administrative steps will be taken by the Centre to “protect, preserve and promote the cultural, social, linguistic identity and heritage of the Assamese people”. So, statement 3 is correct
Which among the following are essential elements of a Nation-State?
- Population
- Territory
- Army
- Government
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
1, 2 and 4 only
Explanation :
Modern Nation-State has four essential elements. These are:
Population: The State is a human institution. It is the people who make a State. Antarctica is not a State as is it is without any human population. The population must be able to sustain a state
Territory: Just as every person belongs to a state, so does every square yard of earth. There is no state without a fixed territory. Living together on a common land binds people together. The territory has to be definite because it ensures the exercise of political authority.
Government: The purpose for which people live together cannot be realized unless they are properly organized and accept certain rules of conduct. The agency created to enforce rules of conduct and ensure obedience is called government. It is through this medium that common policies are determined, common affairs regulated and common interests promoted. Without a government, the people will lack cohesion and means of collective action
Sovereignty: A people inhabiting a definite portion of territory and having a government do not constitute a state so long as they do not possess sovereignty. India before 15 August 1947 had all the other elements of the state but it lacked sovereignty and therefore it was not a State. Sovereignty is the supreme power by which the state commands and exerts political obedience from its people. A state must be internally supreme and free from external control.
Therefore, every state must have a population, a definite territory, a duly established government and sovereignty. The absence of any of these elements deprives it the status of statehood. The first two elements constitute the physical or material basis of the state while the last two form its political and spiritual basis.
Army is not an essential element of a State.
Consider the following statements regarding ‘Evolution of Indian states and union territories’:
- At the time of Independence, India comprised three categories of political units, namely British provinces, Governor’s provinces and princely states.
- In 1950, the Constitution contained a fourfold classification of states and class of territory of the Indian Union – Part A, B, C and D.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
2 only
Explanation :
India comprised two categories of political units at the time of Independence namely British provinces (under the direct rule of British Government) and Princely states (under the rule of native princes). It was in the Indian Independence Act (1947) that two separate and independent dominions of India and Pakistan were created. So, statement 1 is not correct.
The Constitution of 1950 distinguished between three main types of states and a class of territories. Part A states, which were the former Governors’ provinces of British India, were ruled by a Governor appointed by the President and an elected State Legislature.
Part B states, which were former princely states or unions of princely states, governed by a rajpramukh, who was usually the ruler of a constituent state, and an elected legislature. The rajpramukh was appointed by the President of India.
Part C states included both the former chief commissioners’ provinces and some princely states, and each was governed by a chief commissioner appointed by the President of India.
The sole Part D territory was the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, which was administered by a lieutenant governor appointed by the central government. So, statement 2 is correct.
Consider the following statements:
- Creation of a new State in India requires amendment of Schedule 1 to the Constitution.
- If India wants to settle a boundary dispute with Pakistan, it can be done by executive action.
- If India wants to cede a part of its territory to a neighbouring country, it can be done only by amending the Constitution under Article 368.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
1, 2 and 3
Explanation :
One of the special features of the Union of India is that the union is indestructible, but the power conferred on the Parliament includes the power to form a new state or union territory by uniting a part of any State or Union territory to other State or Union territory. The identity of States can be altered or even expunged by the Parliament. The Constituent Assembly declined a motion in the concluding stages to designate India as ‘’Federation of States’’.
Article 1 elucidates India as a ‘’Union of States’’. These states are specified in the First Schedule to the Constitution. The First Schedule lists the States and Territories of India and also lists if any changes to the borders. Thus, creating a new state in India requires an amendment of Schedule 1 to the Constitution. So, statement 1 is correct.
Articles 2 and 3 enable the Parliament by law to admit a new state, increase, decrease the area of any state. Moreover, the Constitution (Article 4) itself declares that laws made for admission or establishment of new states (under Article 2) and formation of new states and alteration of areas, boundaries or names of existing states (under Articles 3) are not to be considered as amendments of the Constitution under Article 368.
But the Supreme Court in the Berubari Union case (1960) held that the power of the Parliament to diminish the area of a state (under Article 3) does not cover the cession of Indian territory to a foreign country. Hence, Indian territory can be ceded to a foreign state only by amending Article 368. So, statement 3 is correct.
On the other hand, the Supreme Court in 1969 ruled that settlement of a boundary dispute between India and another country does not require a constitutional amendment. It can be done by executive action as it does not involve the cession of Indian territory to a foreign country. So, statement 2 is correct.
Consider the following statements with reference to Citizenship:
- The Constitution of India does not define the term citizen.
- All the provisions under Part II of the Constitution that deals with Citizenship came into force on 26th January 1950.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 only
Explanation :
The Constitution of India is the primary legal instrument that lays down who is deemed to be a Citizen of India. The Constitution of India does not define the term citizen. Citizenship is listed in the Union List under the Constitution and thus is under the exclusive jurisdiction of Parliament. The Conferment of a person as a citizen of India is governed under Articles 5 to 11 by Part II of the Constitution of India. However, it contains neither any permanent nor any elaborate provisions in this regard. It only identifies the persons who became citizens of India at its commencement (i.e., on January 26, 1950). It does not deal with the problem of acquisition or loss of citizenship subsequent to its commencement. It empowers the Parliament to enact a law to provide for such matters and any other matter relating to citizenship. Accordingly, the Parliament has enacted the Citizenship Act (1955), which has been amended from time to time. So, statement 1 is correct.
Some provisions of the Constitution pertaining to citizenship, elections, provisional parliament, temporary and transitional provisions, and short title contained in Articles 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 60, 324, 366, 367, 379, 380, 388, 391, 392 and 393 came into force on November 26, 1949, itself. The remaining provisions (the major part) of the Constitution came into force on January 26, 1950. This day is referred to in the Constitution as the ‘date of its commencement’, and celebrated as the Republic Day. So, statement 2 is not correct.
Consider the following statements with reference to Overseas Citizens of India (OCI):
- A person whose parents/grandparents had been a citizen of Pakistan or Bangladesh becomes ineligible to apply for OCI.
- OCI enjoy all the rights and privileges granted to NRIs in financial, economic and educational fields in all aspects.
- OCI cannot enjoy rights conferred under Article 16 of the Constitution of India.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
1 and 3 only
Explanation :
No person, who or either of whose parents or grandparents or great grandparents is or had been a citizen of Pakistan, Bangladesh or such other country as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify, shall be eligible for registration as an Overseas Citizen of India Cardholder. So, statement 1 is correct.
OCI holders enjoy parity with NRIs in financial, economic and educational fields except in the acquisition of agricultural or plantation properties. So, statement 2 is not correct.
OCI card is not a substitute for an Indian visa and therefore, the passport which displays the lifetime visa must be carried by OCI holders while travelling to India. OCI is not to be misconstrued as ‘dual citizenship’. OCI does not confer political rights. The registered Overseas Citizens of India shall not be entitled to the rights conferred on a citizen of India under article 16 of the Constitution with regard to equality of opportunity in matters of public employment. So, statement 3 is correct.
Arrange the following States/Union Territories in ascending year of their formation:
- Daman and Diu
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Sikkim
- Puducherry
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
2-1-4-3
Explanation :
The Twelfth Amendment of the Constitution of India, 1962 incorporated Goa, Daman and Diu as the eighth Union territory of India, The 12th Amendment retroactively came into effect on 20 December 1961, the day following the formal ceremony of official Portuguese surrender.
The Tenth Amendment of the Constitution of India was passed to incorporate Dadra and Nagar Haveli as a union territory, effective 11 August 1961.
Puducherry was administered as an ‘acquired territory’, till 1962 when it was made a union territory by the 14th Constitutional Amendment Act, effective 16 August 1962.
The 36th Constitutional Amendment Act (1975) was enacted to make Sikkim a full-fledged state of the Indian Union (the 22nd state).
So, the correct sequence is 2-1-4-3.
Consider the following statements regarding ‘Union Governments power to acquire foreign territory’:
- Being a sovereign state, India can acquire foreign territories according to the modes recognized by international laws.
- India acquired several foreign territories such as Sikkim, Goa and Pondicherry before the commencement of the Constitution.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 only
Explanation :
Being a sovereign state, India can acquire foreign territories according to the modes recognized by international law, i.e., cession (following treaty, purchase, gift, lease or plebiscite), occupation (hitherto unoccupied by a recognized ruler), conquest or subjugation. Article 2, empowers the parliament ‘to admit into new states on such terms and conditions as it thinks fit.
Thus article 2 grant two power to the parliament:
The power to admit into the union of India new state.
The power to establish new state. So, statement 1 is correct.
India acquired several foreign territories such as Dadra and Nagar Haveli; Goa, Daman and Diu; Pondicherry; and Sikkim after the commencement of the Constitution. Goa -1961; Pondicherry – 1954; Sikkim -1975. So, statement 2 in not correct.
Consider the following statements regarding ‘Reorganization of states’:
- The States Reorganization Commission under the chairmanship of Fazl Ali, completely rejected the idea of reorganization of states based on language.
- By the State Reorganization Act of 1956, the distinction between Part B and Part C states was done away.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Neither 1 nor 2
Explanation :
The creation of Andhra state in 1953 as first linguistic state intensified the demand from other regions as well. This forced government to appoint a three-member State Reorganization Commission under the chairmanship of Fazl Ali. It broadly accepted language as the basis of the reorganization of states. But it rejected the theory of ‘One language one state’. So, statement 1 is not correct.
The Commission suggested the abolition of the four-fold classification of states under the original Constitution and creation of 16 states and 3 centrally administered territories.
By the States Reorganization Act (1956) and the 7th Constitutional Amendment Act (1956), the distinction between Part A and Part B states was done away and Part C states were abolished. Some of them are merged with adjacent states and some were designated as union territories. So, statement 2 is not correct.
Consider the following statements with reference to the Union Territories in India:
- The President has the power to put a Union Territory under the jurisdiction of the high court of an adjacent state.
- The constitution does not provide any special provisions for the administration of newly acquired territories.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
2 only
Explanation :
Articles 239 to 241 in Part VIII of the Constitution deal with the union territories. Every union territory is administered by the President acting through an administrator appointed by him. The President can also appoint the governor of a state as the administrator of an adjoining union territory.
The Parliament can make laws on any subject of the three lists (including the State List) for the union territories. The Parliament can establish a high court for a union territory or put it under the jurisdiction of the high court of an adjacent state. So, statement 1 is not correct.
The Constitution does not contain any separate provisions for the administration of acquired territories. But, the constitutional provisions for the administration of union territories also apply to the acquired territories. So, statement 2 is correct.
Consider the following statements:
- The Government of India can cede an Indian territory to a foreign country by an executive action.
- Settlement of a boundary dispute between India and a neighboring country can be done through an Act of Parliament only.
Which of the statements given above is/are not correct?
Both 1 and 2
Explanation :
Article 3 of the Constitution of India talks about the power of the Parliament to reorganize the states. In a reference made by the President to the Supreme Court in 1960, the question came whether the power of the Parliament to diminish the area of a state under Article 3, includes power to cede territory to a foreign country. The Supreme Court held that the power of Parliament to diminish the area of a state (under Article 3) does not cover cession of Indian territory to a foreign country. Hence, an Indian territory can be ceded to a foreign state only by amending the Constitution under Article 368. So, statement 1 is not correct.
On the other hand, the Supreme Court in 1969 ruled that settlement of a boundary dispute between India and another country does not require a Constitutional Amendment. It can be done by executive action as it does not involve cession of Indian territory to a foreign country. The 100th Constitutional Amendment Act of 2015 was enacted to give effect to the acquiring of certain territories by India and transfer of certain other territories to Bangladesh in pursuance of the agreement and its protocol entered into between the Governments of India and Bangladesh. So, statement 2 is not correct.
Which one of the following best defines ‘Amicus Curiae’?
A person not a party to the litigation who volunteers to help the court.
Explanation :
Amicus Curiae is Latin for “friend of the court’’. As per the definition in Merriam Webster amicus Curiae is defined as -One (such as a professional person or organization) that is not a party to a particular litigation but that is permitted by the court to advise it in respect to some matter of law that directly affects the case in question.
Amicus curiae refers to a person who volunteers to help the court in deciding some matters; however it is the discretion of the court whether to accept it or not. In certain cases, the court appoints the amicus curiae, where there is no one to represent one of the parties to the case or where the question in the case refers to the greater public good.
Consider the following statements with reference to review petition in Supreme Court:
- It is the last constitutional resort available for redressal of grievances in the Court.
- Any person aggrieved by a ruling can seek a review and not necessarily by the parties to the case.
- They are heard through written arguments by the judges in their chambers and no open court hearing is allowed in any case.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
2 only
Explanation :
In India, a binding decision of the Supreme Court/High Court can be reviewed in a review petition. The court has the power to review its rulings to correct a “patent error” and not “minor mistakes of inconsequential import”. So, when a review takes place, the law is that it is allowed not to take fresh stock of the case but to correct grave errors that have resulted in the miscarriage of justice.
It is not necessary that only parties to a case can seek a review of the judgment on it. As per the Civil Procedure Code and the Supreme Court Rules, any person aggrieved by a ruling can seek a review. However, the court does not entertain every review petition filed. It exercises its discretion to allow a review petition only when it shows the grounds for seeking the review. So, statement 2 is correct.
As per 1996 rules framed by the Supreme Court, a review petition must be filed within 30 days of the date of judgment or order. The rules state that review petitions would ordinarily be entertained without oral arguments by lawyers. It is heard “through circulation” (written arguments) by the judges in their chambers. In exceptional cases, the court allows an oral hearing. In a 2014 case, the Supreme Court held that review petitions in all death penalty cases will be heard in open court by a Bench of three judges. So, statement 3 is not correct.
However, a review petition is not the last constitutional resort available for redressal of grievances in court. In Roopa Hurra v Ashok Hurra (2002), the court itself evolved the concept of a curative petition, which can be heard after a review is dismissed to prevent abuse of its process. A curative petition is also entertained on very narrow grounds like a review petition and is generally not granted an oral hearing. So, statement 1 is not correct.
Consider the following statements with reference to the Chief Justice of India (CJI):
- The CJI has no fixed tenure and his tenure is same as that of other Supreme Court judges.
- He has the sole discretion of deciding the composition of benches and assigning cases to judges.
- Article 126 mandates the incumbent CJI to recommend to the government his successor.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 and 2 only
Explanation :
The Constitution has not fixed the tenure of CJI. However, Article 124 states that all Supreme Court judges (including CJI) hold office until he/she attains the age of 65 years. So, statement 1 is correct.
Recently, the Supreme Court in the Shanti Bhushan vs Supreme Court of India case ruled that the Chief Justice of India was the first among equals (judges) and had “exclusive prerogative in the allocation of cases and the constitution of benches”. “As a repository of constitutional trust CJI is an institution in himself.” There was no concept of “senior” or “junior” SC judges as all are equally competent to decide any case allotted to them by the Chief Justice of India, who alone had the power to constitute benches and assign cases. CJI was the master of the roster and had sole discretion. So, statement 2 is correct.
As per the Memorandum of Procedure governing the appointment of members of the higher judiciary, “appointment to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be of the senior-most judge of the Supreme Court considered fit to hold the office”. It stipulates that the law minister would, at an appropriate time, seek the recommendation of the outgoing Chief Justice of India for the appointment of the next CJI. Under this process, after receipt of the recommendation of the CJI, the law minister puts it before the Prime Minister who advises the President in the matter of appointment. Hence it can be inferred that the recommendations of the CJI are not binding upon the government. So, statement 3 is not correct.
Consider the following statements:
- The revision of the salary and allowances of the Supreme Court and High Court judges does not require a constitutional amendment.
- The pension of a retired judge of the High Court is charged upon the consolidated fund of the state of his last posting.
- After retirement, a permanent judge of a High Court cannot plead or act in any court or before any authority in India.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 only
Explanation :
Article 125 of the Constitution authorises the Parliament to determine the salaries, allowances, privileges, leave and pension of the judges of the Supreme Court and High court from time to time.
Salaries, gratuity, pension, allowances etc. in respect of Judges of Supreme Court are governed by the Supreme Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1958. Salaries etc. of Judges of High Courts are governed by the High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1954. A change in the Acts is required whenever there is any proposal for revision of salaries/pension gratuity, allowances etc. in respect of Judges of Supreme Court and High Courts. Amendment to the Constitution is not required for this purpose. So, statement 1 is correct.
The pension of a retired judge of the High Court is charged on the Consolidated Fund of India according to Article 112(3) of the Constitution of India whereas salaries & allowances are charged on the Consolidated Fund of State. So, statement 2 is not correct.
The Constitution doesn’t prohibit the judges of the Supreme Court and high courts from taking any post-retirement jobs and it also doesn’t restrict the power of government to appoint any retired judges for any commissions or tribunals etc. The Judges of High Court, after their retirement, can enroll as an Advocate and can appear in all other Courts except in the Courts of the State of their Posting. However, Judges of the Supreme Court of India, after their retirement, cannot appear in any Court of India. So, statement 3 is not correct.
Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
Which of the following conditions are ideal for the formation of dew?
- Low relative humidity
- Clear sky and calm air
- Cold and long nights
- Dew point below the freezing point
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
2 and 3 only
Explanation :
After condensation, the water vapour or the moisture in the atmosphere takes one of the following forms — dew, frost, fog and clouds.
When the moisture is deposited in the form of water droplets on cooler surfaces of solid objects (rather than nuclei in the air above the surface) such as stones, grass blades and plant leaves, it is known as dew. The ideal conditions for its formation are the clear sky, calm air, high relative humidity, and cold and long nights. For the formation of dew, the dew point must be above the freezing point.
“There is uniformity of temperature throughout the year. The diurnal range of temperature is also small. Precipitation is heavy and well distributed throughout the year. There is no winter.” This is the most likely description of
Equatorial climate
Explanation :
The equatorial, hot, wet climate is found between 5° and 10° north and south of the equator. The most outstanding feature of the equatorial climate is its great uniformity of temperature throughout the year. The mean monthly temperatures are always around 80°F with very little variation. There is no winter. Cloudiness and heavy precipitation help to moderate the daily temperature, so that even at the equator itself, the climate is not unbearable. Regular land and sea breezes assist in maintaining a truly equable climate. The diurnal range of temperature is small, and so is the annual range. Precipitation is heavy and well distributed throughout the year. There is no month without rain, and a distinct dry season like those of the Savanna or the Tropical monsoon climate is absent. The relative humidity is constantly high (over 80 per cent) making one feel sticky and uncomfortable.
” This is a very low cloud, uniformly grey and thick, which appears like a low ceiling or highland fog. It brings dull weather with light drizzle. It reduces the visibility of aircraft and is thus a danger.” This is the most likely description of
Stratus clouds
Explanation :
Stratus (St) is a very low cloud, uniformly grey and thick, which appears like a low ceiling or highland fog. These are layered clouds covering large portions of the sky. These clouds are generally formed either due to loss of heat or the mixing of air masses with different temperatures. It brings dull weather with light drizzle. It reduces the visibility of aircraft and is thus a danger.
General classification of clouds:
Low-level clouds (cumulus, stratus, stratocumulus) that lie below 6,500 feet (1,981 m).
Middle clouds (altocumulus, nimbostratus, altostratus) that form between 6,500 and 20,000 feet (1981–6,096 m).
High-level clouds (cirrus, cirrocumulus, cirrostratus) that form above 20,000 feet (6,096 m).
Cumulonimbus, which tower across the low, middle, and upper atmosphere.
Consider the following statements with reference to the Mediterranean type of climate:
- The major cause of this climate is the shifting of the wind belts.
- In summer, the prevailing trade winds are on-shore and the relative humidity is very high.
- The Mediterranean lands receive most of their precipitation in winter.
- It is also found in central Chile and California.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1, 3 and 4 only
Explanation :
The Warm Temperate Western Margin climate (Mediterranean) is found in relatively few areas in the world. They are entirely confined to the western portion of continental masses, between 30° and 45° north and south of the equator. The basic cause of this climate is the shifting of the wind belts. Though the area around the Mediterranean Sea has the greatest extent of this type, it is also found in central Chile, California, the south-western tip of Africa, southern Australia and southwest Australia. So, statement 1 and statement 4 are correct.
During summer, rain-bearing winds are not likely to reach the Mediterranean lands. The prevailing Trade winds are off-shore and there is practically no rain. The air is dry, the heat is intense and the relative humidity is low. The days are excessively warm and in the interiors, prolonged droughts are common. So, statement 2 is not correct.
The Mediterranean lands receive most of their precipitation in winter when the Westerlies shift towards the equator. In the northern hemisphere, the prevailing on-shore Westerlies bring much cyclonic rain from the Atlantic to the countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea. This is the rainy season and is the most outstanding feature of the Mediterranean climate. In almost all other climate types maximum rain comes in summer. So, statement 3 is correct.
” These are formed when snowflakes melt into a raindrop in a wedge of warm air well above the ground and then refreeze in a layer of freezing air just above the surface. This results in frozen raindrops, or small ice pellets.” This is the most likely description of
Sleet
Explanation :
Sleet occurs when snowflakes melt into a raindrop in a wedge of warm air well above the ground and then refreeze in a layer of freezing air just above the surface. This results in frozen raindrops, or small ice pellets.
At ground level, sleet is only common during winter storms when the snow melts as it falls and the resulting water refreezes into sleet prior to hitting the ground. In thunderstorms, sleet is possible above the melting level where cloud droplets become supercooled and may instantaneously freeze when making contact with other cloud particles or debris, such as dust particles. Sleet is also called ice pellets.
Snow forms mainly when water vapour turns to ice without going through the liquid stage. This process is called deposition. Snow can form in the gentle updrafts of stratus clouds or at high altitudes in very cold regions of a thunderstorm. Snowflakes that most of us are used to seeing are not individual snow crystals but are actually aggregates, or collections, of snow crystals that stick or otherwise attach to each other. Aggregates can grow to very large sizes compared to individual snow crystals.
Hail is frozen precipitation that can grow to very large sizes through the collection of water that freezes onto the hailstone’s surface. Hailstones begin as embryos, which include graupel or sleet, and then grow in size. Hailstones can have a variety of shapes and include lumps and bumps that may even take the shape of small spikes. Hailstones must be at least 0.2 inches in size.
Graupel is soft, small pellets formed when supercooled water droplets freeze onto a snow crystal, a process called riming. If the riming is particularly intense, the rimed snow crystal can grow to an appreciable size but remain less than 0.2 inches. Graupel is also called snow pellets or soft hail, as the graupel particles are particularly fragile and generally disintegrate when handled.
Consider the following statements with reference to forests:
- Monsoon forests grow in areas having a limited period of the rainy season.
- Trees in temperate deciduous forests shed their leaves at the onset of the winter.
- Species richness of equatorial forests makes it suitable for greater commercial exploitation.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 and 2 only
Explanation :
Monsoon Forests: These forests are found in central and northeast India, Myanmar, Vietnam, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia and northeast Australia. The main characteristic of monsoon climate is the limited period of the rainy season. Duration and amount of rainfall affect the density of forests. Hence, monsoon forests are not very dense. The characteristics are dense undergrowth and bamboo groves. Sal, teak and shisham are important trees of the region. So, statement 1 is correct.
Temperate Deciduous Hardwood Forests: Temperate regions of moderate temperature and rainfall like central and western Europe, north-eastern USA, southern Russia, Central America, eastern Asia have hardwood deciduous forests. Trees of these forests shed their leaves at the onset of the winter and remain without leaves throughout the winter; Like the tropical rainforest, these forests also have trees of different species mixed. Woods from these forests are strong and durable. So, Statement 2 is correct.
Equatorial Forests: These forests extend between 50 N and 50 S of the equator. They are found m the Congo basin of Africa the Amazon basin of South America and with some modifications in Malaysia and Indonesia. The equatorial forests in the Amazon basin are also known as selvas. Most of the trees in these forests have hardwood. One of the problems of the economic exploitation of these forests is the scattering of trees of one species over a wide area. In other words, trees of any one species are not found in one area. As a result, one has to have to a big area to get them in a large number. So, Statement 3 is not correct.
Consider the following statements with reference to trojan asteroids:
- Trojan asteroids share an orbit with a larger planet.
- Earth has the highest number of trojan asteroids.
- Trojan asteroids are located in Lagrange points.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
1 and 3 only
Explanation :
Asteroids are divided into three categories.
First, those found in the main asteroid belt, between Mars and Jupiter. This region is estimated to contain somewhere between 1.1-1.9 million asteroids.
The second group is that of trojans, which are asteroids that share an orbit with a larger planet. So, statement 1 is correct:
The third classification of asteroids is under Near-Earth Asteroids (NEA), which has orbits that pass close to the Earth. Those that cross the Earth’s orbit are called Earth-crossers. More than 10,000 such asteroids are known, of which over 1,400 are classified as potentially hazardous asteroids (PHAs).
Jupiter has the highest number of Trojan asteroids in the solar system. So, statement 2 is not correct:
Trojan asteroids are located in Lagrange points. Lagrange points are the location where the gravitational pull of the Sun and the parent planet are balanced. This prevents Trojan asteroids from colliding with the parent planet. So, statement 3 is correct.