PSY111 - ch2 Flashcards

0
Q
  • heuristic that involves judging the probability of an event by its superficial similarity to a prototype
  • judging a book by its cover or “like goes with like”
A

representativeness heuristic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q
  • mental shortcut that helps us to streamline our thinking and make sense of our world
  • in some cases they can lead us to an oversimplified reality
A

heuristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  • how common a characteristic or behavior is in the general population
A

base rate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  • heuristic that involves estimating the likelihood of an occurrence based on the ease with which it comes to our minds
  • how available it is in our memories
A

availability heuristic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  • systematic errors in thinking
A

cognitive biases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  • watching behavior in real-world settings without trying too manipulate the situation (peoples behaviors)
  • watching behavior “unfold” without intervening it
A

naturalistic observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  • the extent to which we can generalize our findings to real-world settings
  • some psychologists contend that naturalistic designs almost always have a higher ______ than laboratory experiments
A

external validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  • extent to which we can draw cause-and-effect interferences from a study
  • we can manipulate the variables ourselves
A

internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  • research design that examines one person or a small number of people in depth, often over an extended time period
A

case study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  • procedure that ensures every person in a population has an equal chance of being chosen to participate
A

random selection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  • consistency of measurement
A

reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
  • extent to which a measure assesses what it purports(claims) to measure
  • we can think of it as “truth in advertising”
A

validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  • tendency of research participants to distort their responses to questionnaire items
  • OR IN OTHER WORDS: tendencies to distort their answers to items, often in a socially desirable direction
A

response set

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  • research design that examines the extent to which 2 variables are associated
  • relate to each other statistically
A

correlation design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

-grouping of points on a two-dimensional graph in which each dot represents a single person’s data

A

scatterplot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  • perception of a statistical association between two variables where none exist
  • ex: full moon and people
A

illusory correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  • research design characterized by random assignment of participants to conditions and manipulation of an independent variable
  • if a study doesn’t contain both of them, it’s not an experiment
A

experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q
  • randomly sorting participants into two groups
A

random assignment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q
  • in an experiment, the group of participants that receives the manipulation
A

experimental group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q
  • in an experiment, the group of participants that doesn’t receive the manipulation
A

control group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

-variable that an experimenter manipulates

A

independent variable

21
Q

-variable that an experimenter measures to see whether the manipulation has an effect

A

dependent variable

22
Q
  • a working definition of what a researcher is measuring; specifying how we’re measuring a variable
  • when we define our independent and dependent variables for the purposes of study
A

operational definition

23
Q
  • improvement resulting from the mere expectation of improvement (people on medicine might get better because they knew they were receiving treatment)
  • latin for “i will please”
A

placebo affect

24
Q
  • unaware of whether one is in the experimental or control group
  • if patients aren’t ______ to their condition, then the experiment is ruined because the patients differ in their expectations of improvement
A

blind

25
Q
  • placebo effect has an “evil twin”
  • is harm resulting from the mere expectation of harm
  • latin phrase = “to harm”
  • ex: some who is allergic to roses sneezes to fake roses
A

nocebo effect

26
Q
  • phenomenon in which researchers hypotheses lead them to unintentionally bias the outcome of a study
  • when participant doesn’t know the condition assigned, but the experimenter does
A

experimental expectancy effect/Rosenthal effect

27
Q

-when neither researchers nor participants are aware of who’s in the experimental or conditional group

A

double-blind

28
Q
  • cues that participants pick up from a study that allow them to generate guesses regarding the researchers hypotheses
  • researchers get an unbiased view of participants thoughts and behaviors
A

demand characteristics

29
Q
  • informing research participants of what is involved in a study before asking them to participate
A

informed consent

30
Q
  • application of mathematics to describing and analyzing data
A

statistics

31
Q
  • numerical characterizations that describe data
A

descriptive statistics

32
Q
  • measure of the “central” scores in a data set, or where the group tends to cluster
A

central tendncy

33
Q
  • average; a measure of central tendency
A

mean

34
Q
  • middle score in a data set; a measure of central tendency
A

median

35
Q

most frequent score in a data set; a measure of central tendency

A

mode

36
Q
  • measure of how loosely or tightly bunched scores are
A

variability/dispersion

37
Q
  • difference between the highest and lowest scores

- a measure of dispersion

A

range

38
Q
  • measure of dispersion that takes into account how far each data point is taken from the mean
A

standard deviation

39
Q
  • mathematical methods that allow us to determine whether we can generalize findings from our sample to the full population
A

inferential deviation

40
Q

“psychology has a long past, but only a short history”

A

hermann ebbinghaus 1908

41
Q

influences that led to psychology as a discrete scientific discipline (8):

A

biology, philosophy, medicine and psychiatry, scientific experimental methodology, physiology, statistics, social sciences, education

42
Q
  • individual personal experience
A

humanistic perspective

43
Q

year of 1879:

A

Wihelm Wundt establishes the first psychological labroratory in Leipzig Germany

44
Q

year of 1900:

A

Sigmund Freud publishes The Interpretation of Dreams

45
Q

year of 1908:

A

Alfred Binet publishes a scale of tests grouped by the ages at which the tests could be expected to be passed

46
Q

year of 1928:

A

Ivan P. Pavlov offers Lectures on Conditioned Reflexes

47
Q

year of 1950:

A

John Dollard and Neal E. Miller published Personality and Psychotherapy

48
Q

year of 1954:

A

Abraham Maslow publishes Motivation and Personality

49
Q

course description:

A

Introduction to the science of human behavior and mental processes. Student examine the relationship between the nervous system and behavior, learning, perception, language, personality, intelligence, and psychopathology.