Lecture 9 p2: behaviour in a social context Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

how u react w/ ur friends vs parents

Social Behavior

A

The intricate array of actions and reactions exhibited by individuals in response to the presence or actions of others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Social Behaviour facts

A

● In groups, humans naturally engage in the creation of explicit rules and unspoken agreements, establishing a framework for interaction.
■ This phenomenon is evident in the development of cultural norms and societal structures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Norms

A

Socially accepted standards of behavior often lack a transparent rationale for their existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

norms example

A

● Take, for instance, traffic laws; the choice of driving on the left or right appears arbitrary, yet it becomes a universally accepted standard.
■ The seemingly arbitrary nature of norms prompts reflection on why certain behaviors are considered socially acceptable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Cultural Evolution

A

The gradual development and modification of culture over time as a result of collective agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

cultural evolution facts

A

● Social norms, including those surrounding gender roles, sexual practices, and personal space, evolve over time through a continuous process of negotiation within communities.
■ Changes in societal perspectives on love and marriage reflect the dynamic nature of cultural evolution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Subjectivity of Normalcy

A

The concept of “normal” is subjectively shaped by an individual’s cultural upbringing and environment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

cope

Psychological Tension

A

The mental discomfort stems from conflicting thoughts or beliefs when deviating from learned norms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Conformity

A

The adjustment of one’s behavior or thinking to align with the established standards of a group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

conformity facts

A

○ Adherence to rules becomes meaningful in a social context as individuals naturally seek acceptance within groups.
○ Even when individuals are aware of a conflict between personal beliefs and group norms, the desire for social acceptance often prevails.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

types of Social Influence

A

Informational social influence
Normative social influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ill do anything for u pls dont leave me

Normative social influence

A

driven by the desire for social acceptance and the avoidance of rejection.
■ These influences are crucial for navigating the intricate dynamics of group behavior.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

ur all sheep

Informational social influence

A

following others due to perceived knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

bar experiment

Solomon Asch’s Conformity Study: core settings

A

○ A visual perception task often conformed to incorrect answers provided by confederates.
○ Normative Social Influence
○ The study shows the prevalence of conformity, even when individuals are cognizant of the correct answer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Social Conformity and Influencing Factors

A
  1. Individual Responses to Conformity
  2. Comfort Levels in Conforming
  3. Influence of Group Size
  4. Presence of a Dissenter
  5. Cost of Conformity
  6. Ambiguity and Conformity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Individual Responses to Conformity

A

The inherent inclination of an individual to align with or resist group behavior.
■ Individuals may embrace or reject conformity based on their personal disposition.
○ A commitment to avoiding passivity, showing potential awkwardness in non-conformity.

17
Q

Comfort Levels in Conforming

A

The varied degrees of comfort individuals experience when conforming to or deviating from group norms.
■ Comfort levels differ, influencing whether one chooses to be an outlier or adhere to the group.
○ People’s diverse comfort levels show the spectrum in embracing or rejecting group behavior.

18
Q

Influence of Group Size

A

The impact of a group’s size on an individual’s likelihood to conform.
○ Group size plays a pivotal role in the pressure individuals feel to align with the majority.
■ Example
● Larger groups intensify conformity pressure.
● Smaller groups heighten conformity likelihood due to increased individual scrutiny.

19
Q

the rebel

Presence of a Dissenter

A

The effect of an individual within a group who dissents from the majority.
■ Dissenters hold a significant influence, reducing overall group conformity.
○ A lone dissenter encourages others to resist conformity.
■ Dissenters serve as role models, empowering non-conforming behavior.

20
Q

if everyone jumped off a bridge would you???

Cost of Conformity

A

The perceived expense, whether financial or psychological, is associated with conforming to group behavior.
■ Individuals weigh the costs before deciding to conform or deviate.
○ Conforming is less likely when costs, be it financial or psychological, are high.
■ Ambiguity and uncertainty may drive individuals to conform to avoid potential costs.

21
Q

not thinker look at other ppl to be

Ambiguity and Conformity

A

The tendency to conform in situations where uncertainty or lack of clarity prevails.
■ Ambiguous scenarios prompt individuals to seek cues from others for guidance.
○ In unfamiliar situations, people observe others to understand appropriate behavior.
■ Ambiguity leads individuals to look around and align with the majority

22
Q

Experiment and Examples

A

A Hidden Camera Experiment Illustrating Social Conformity
■ Class conforming to arbitrary group behavior without understanding the rationale.
■ Social influence persists even in the absence of immediate peer pressure.
○ The addition of an outsider unfamiliar with group rules results in the individual adopting group behavior.

23
Q

Power in Numbers

A

The intrinsic inclination of the brain to seek conformity for efficiency and comfort.
■ The brain finds comfort and efficiency in aligning with the group’s decisions.
○ Individuals naturally gravitate towards group decisions for daily activities, finding power in collective choices

24
Q

Inherent Social Nature

A

The fundamental characteristic of humans as social beings who derive satisfaction from group inclusion.
■ Humans naturally crave social connections and prefer being part of a larger entity.
○ The intrinsic desire for social belonging, showing the importance of group participation

25
Q

cults and revolutions

Minority Influence

A

Refers to a phenomenon where a small group deviates from the majority, aiming to impact the majority’s beliefs or actions.

26
Q

completing an art project

Conditions for Influence

A

● High commitment to their viewpoint.
● Independence in the face of majority pressure.
● Consistency over time.
● Appearance of an open mind.

27
Q

working on art project and giving up midway

Factors Leading to Dismissal

A

■ Lack of commitment.
■ Yielding under pressure.
■ Inconsistency.
■ Perceived close-mindedness.

28
Q

Obedience to Authority

A

The Milgram Experiment

29
Q

purpose of Milgram study

A

explores the extent to which individuals obey authority figures, even when it involves harming others.

30
Q

Experimental Setup

A

○ Participants believed they were part of a memory improvement study.
○ The task involved delivering shocks to a learner for incorrect answers.
○ The learner’s responses were scripted or prerecorded

31
Q

Results of Milgram

A

two-thirds of participants went to the maximum voltage (450 volts) despite the learner’s apparent distress

32
Q

Milgram experiment revealed that…

A

ordinary individuals, under the influence of authority, could commit acts against their conscience, comparable to actions during World War II atrocities.
○ The responsibility for actions shifted to the authority figure, showing the role of obedience in extreme situations.

33
Q

basically sociology

Social Psychology

A

● Obedience, Compliance, and Group Dynamics
● Situational Factors
● Personal Characteristics
● Compliance Techniques
● Individuation and Group Behavior
● Social Loafing

34
Q

Obedience, Compliance, and Group Dynamics

A

Obedience Experiment
■ The experiment involves a learner and an authority figure administering shocks.
● Proximity and legitimacy of the authority figure significantly impact obedience.
■ The learner’s location and the authority figure’s closeness influence the outcomes.

35
Q

gojo satoru copieum

Situational Factors

A

Factors related to circumstances, such as the location of the learner and authority figure.
○ The closeness and legitimacy of the authority figure have a profound influence on obedience.

■ Example
● If the experimenter is physically present, participants are more likely to follow instructions.

36
Q

im to fuckin good

Personal Characteristics

A

Individual traits like political orientation, are not as influential as situational factors.
■ Political orientation, religious affiliation, and occupation had no significant impact on obedience.
○ Regardless of personal characteristics, the situational context played a more critical role.

37
Q

mild form of manipulation

Compliance Techniques

A

Strategies to induce compliance include reciprocity, foot-in-the-door, and low-balling.
○ Compliance techniques exploit social norms, with examples like offering a small request before a larger one (foot-in-the-door).
■ Example
● Providing a free sample creates a sense of reciprocity, making individuals more likely to comply.

38
Q

midsoummar

Individuation and Group Behavior

A

Loss of individual identity in a group leads to disinhibited behavior.
■ In group settings, individuals may lose themselves in the crowd, contributing to reduced individual effort.
○ Online anonymity and reduced effort in group projects illustrate how individuation influences behavior.

39
Q

Social Loafing

A

Reduced motivation in a group setting.
■ Individuals may exert less effort in a group project when their performance is not individually monitored.
○ Without individual grading, some contributors may exhibit social loafing.