Lecture 19 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

which condition of the Furuya, Nitsche, Paulus and Eckart study about MD had beneficial effects?

A

CaAu
- cathode affected
- anode unaffected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what did the CaAu condition attempt to do?

A
  • increase inhibition in affected
  • increasing excitations in other hemisphere
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the 4 groups in Furuya study about musicians dystonia and what do the negative values indicate on the graph?

A
  • CaAu
  • CuAa
  • UniAu
  • sham
  • negative values = decrease in rhythmic variability of keystrokes relative to baseline
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are the disadvantages to listening to live music?

A

expensive
uncomfortable
logistical problems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are the advantages to listening to live music?

A
  • social connection with others
  • connection to performers (same physical space, opportunity to interact with them, experiencing unique performance as it unfolds live)
  • good for physical and mental health
  • reduce stress hormones
  • promote prosocial behavior
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what were the results of the 10-year longitudinal study about participating in cultural events?

A

participation in various cultural events may provide protective benefits against age-related cognitive decline

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what do adults who move in synchrony demonstrate?

A
  • prosocial effects
  • rmr more about each other
  • greater levels of trust and cooperation
  • higher levels of liking
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

shared musical experiences are important for promoting ____ and _____

A

social-emotional bonds
altruistic behaviors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what do heartbeats of concert attendees demonstrate?

A

greater entrainment compared to those who listen to prerecorded performances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are performers influenced by?

A

the audience
- the body responds differently to some basic physical properties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

why does moving to the beat seems to be culturally universal?

A

auditory-motor interactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what do head movements do?

A
  • reliable indicator of entrainment
  • encoding emotional info
  • movement vigor and distance correlated with intensity of emotion
  • form of non-verbal communication
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what did Swabrick study about using head movements to capture the concert experience measure?

A
  • measuring head movement (DV) during live performance and compared it to the same exposure to precorded music
  • takes advantages of concerts providing ecological validity setting for investigating group dynamics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What methods did Swabrick use to study how head movements captures the effects of live music?

A
  • fans or neural listeners randomly assigned to live or album playback conditions
  • wore motion-capture caps
  • questionnaires administered, covering familiarity with performer, current state of arousal, happiness and musical expertise
  • follow-up questionnaire after
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what were the effects of the Swabrick study (head movements during concert) related to?

A
  • preference (self-report)
  • familiarity (self-report, compare effects of previously released song to those associated with new songs)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

purpose of LIVELab?

A

investigate experience of music, dance, multimedia presentations, and human interaction in concert space

17
Q

what were the results of the Swabrick study (head movement during concert)?

A
  • head movements more vigorous in live condition
  • due to greater arousal, anticipation, increased concentration with artist
  • degree of entrainment not affected by concert status
  • fans moved their heads more vigorously and with better entrainment to the beat
  • no differences as a function musical training (entrainment is independent of musical training)
  • for unfamiliar songs, no difference in entrainment across live/prerecorded conditions
  • for familiar song, head movement entrainment for fans greater in live condition
18
Q

what could Swabrick control?

A

communal experience - same venue
familiarity/preference

19
Q

what could Swabrick not control?

A
  • visual info associated with live concert
  • how the rest of the audience responded
  • obtrusiveness of wearing motion-captured device
  • potential self-consciousness associated with being monitored
20
Q

what are some directions for future research by Swabrick?

A
  • how movement of individuals is affected by those around them
  • effects of different musical characteristics
  • whether shared concert experience can lead to more prosocial behaviors and/or bonding
  • how performers are affected by audience