Leadership Flashcards

1
Q

30% of var in leadership is due to genetics

A

Arvey et al. (2007)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Mot to lead scale and validitation

A

Chan Drasgow (2001): 3 factors affective identity, noncalculative and social-normative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Personality leadership

A

Judge et al. (2002) Overall .48; E, C, O strongest predictors, GMA (.27)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Personality transformational

A

BonoJudge (2004): ES and E pos rlt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dimensions id in Ohio State studes

A

Kerr et al. (1974): initiating structure & consideration–> Judge et al. (2004) argued we abandoned too soon.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Contingency theory

A

Fiedler (1967): least preferred coworker: 3 dimensions to sit (rlts, perform goal clarity and formal authority)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Path-goal Theory

A

House (1971); House Mitchell (1974); House (1996)

align goals, facilitate achievement, clarify path and ensure goals are valuable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

4 categories in P-G

A

Participative, directive, supportive, achievement-oriented

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Subsitutes for Leadership Theory

A

Kerr Kermier (1978): sit chars either neutralize behaviors by blocking effectiveness or act as substitute while pos influencing outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Beginning of Transact/Transform

A

Burns (1978) OG; Bass (1985) further conceptualized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Transactional

A

Laissez-fair, active mgmt. by exception, passive mgmt, by exception, contingent reward

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Transform

A

Idealized influence, inspirational mot, intellectual stim, individualized consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Meta of transform

A

Judge Piccolo (2004)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Authentic Leadership

A

Luthans Avolio (2003): from broaden and build theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Charismatic leadership

A

Some argue same as transform (Judge et al., 2008); emphasize on attributions followers make (Conger Kanungo, 1998) or actual leadership behaviors (House, 1977)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

OG citations for LMX

A

Graen (1976) LMX; Dienesch & Liden (1986) VDL

17
Q

LMX Meta

A

Gestner Day (1997)

18
Q

Outcomes of LMX

A

Graen Uhl-Bien (1995): also clarified can be unidimensional

19
Q

Mismatch b/w follower and leader perceptions of LMX quality

A

Gestner Day, 2000: r=.37

20
Q

Cross-cultural LMX

A

Rockstuhl et al. (2012): b/w LMX, OCB, justice, JS, turnover intentions and trust were stronger in horizontal- individualistic.

21
Q

Gender

A

Eagly et al. (1995)–> better when role is feminine; Eagly & Johnson (1990)–> more democratic; Eagly et al. (2003)–> more transform

22
Q

Cross cultural

A

Den Hertog et al. (1999): trustworthiness, fairness, honesty and encouraging/pos all universal; Gerstner Day (1994) traits differ across

23
Q

Personality affects influence tactics: Types of influence tactics

A

Cable Judge (2003); Yukl Falbe (1990)

24
Q

Sources of power

A

French Raven (1959)

25
Q

Ethical Leadership

A

Brown et al. (2005)

26
Q

Abusive leadership

A

Tepper 2000;2007

27
Q

Review of traits differentiating non-leaders & leaders

A

Judge Cable (2004)

28
Q

Shared leadership

A

Pearce, 2000; Pearce Manz, 2004

29
Q

Transactional–>JP

A

Wayne et al. (2011): L-F, A and P mgmt. all neg rlted