Interviewing

Question 1

Structured Interview Def/validity

Answer 1

Huffcutt Arthur 1994 .57 for highest structure, ceiling effect

Question 2

CRVs

Answer 2

Wiesner Cronshaw (1988) .31 for unstructured, .62 for structured

Question 3

Reliability

Answer 3

.37 for level 1, .66 for level 4

Question 4

Meta

Answer 4

Schmidt Hunter 1998: r =.51 for structured, .38 for unstructured–> also has overall performance tables

Question 5

Influence on ratings

Answer 5

Huffcutt 2011:job related content, interview performance, demographic chars, traits (g personality)

Question 6

Faking

Answer 6

Levashina Campion 2006

Question 7

Behavioral description = higher validity

Answer 7

Huffcutt et al., 2001

Question 8

Different types of structures

Answer 8

Campion et al., 1997; Levashina et al., 2014

Question 9

IM

Answer 9

Ellis et al. (2002)

Question 10

Situational interview ?s

Answer 10

Latham Skarlicki, 1995: grounded in goal-setting theory, presents job-related situations and asks what they would do

Question 11

Impression management

Answer 11

Gilmore et al., 1999: attempts to influence images during interaction

Question 12

IM tactics citation: A, I, S-P, D

Answer 12

Ellis et al., 2002: A = Aquire favorable impressions; I = personal liking; S-P = attributions of confidence; D = repair image

Question 13

What are we assessing in interviews?

Answer 13

Posthuma et al. 2002: fit rlt to skills, goal orientation, values, liking and attractiveness of applicant
Huffcut et al., 2001: personality/social skills

Question 14

Correlates of interview

Answer 14

Salgado et al. 2002

Question 15

Situational interview ?s

Answer 15

Latham et al., 1980

Question 16

Past behavioral ?s

Answer 16

Janz (1982)

Question 17

Levels of structure

Answer 17

Huffcut Arthur 1994: 4 levels–> 3/4 comparable validity to CA, WS and job know. (Schmidt Hunter 1998)

Question 18

4 factors of structure (compared to Campion et al., 1997)

Answer 18

Chapman Zweig (2005): eval std., ? consistency, ? sophistication, rapport building

Question 19

Validity issues

Answer 19

Posthuma et al., 2002: 5 areas of interview validity = social, cog, individual diffs, measurement and outcomes

Question 20

Legal defensibility

Answer 20

Williamson et al., 1997: structure is better.

Question 21

Sub grp diffs

Answer 21

Roth et al., 2002: larger than expected, .36-.56, comparable to g