Interviewing Flashcards
Structured Interview Def/validity
Huffcutt Arthur 1994 .57 for highest structure, ceiling effect
CRVs
Wiesner Cronshaw (1988) .31 for unstructured, .62 for structured
Reliability
.37 for level 1, .66 for level 4
Meta
Schmidt Hunter 1998: r =.51 for structured, .38 for unstructured–> also has overall performance tables
Influence on ratings
Huffcutt 2011:job related content, interview performance, demographic chars, traits (g personality)
Faking
Levashina Campion 2006
Behavioral description = higher validity
Huffcutt et al., 2001
Different types of structures
Campion et al., 1997; Levashina et al., 2014
IM
Ellis et al. (2002)
Situational interview ?s
Latham Skarlicki, 1995: grounded in goal-setting theory, presents job-related situations and asks what they would do
Impression management
Gilmore et al., 1999: attempts to influence images during interaction
IM tactics citation: A, I, S-P, D
Ellis et al., 2002: A = Aquire favorable impressions; I = personal liking; S-P = attributions of confidence; D = repair image
What are we assessing in interviews?
Posthuma et al. 2002: fit rlt to skills, goal orientation, values, liking and attractiveness of applicant
Huffcut et al., 2001: personality/social skills
Correlates of interview
Salgado et al. 2002
Situational interview ?s
Latham et al., 1980
Past behavioral ?s
Janz (1982)
Levels of structure
Huffcut Arthur 1994: 4 levels–> 3/4 comparable validity to CA, WS and job know. (Schmidt Hunter 1998)
4 factors of structure (compared to Campion et al., 1997)
Chapman Zweig (2005): eval std., ? consistency, ? sophistication, rapport building
Validity issues
Posthuma et al., 2002: 5 areas of interview validity = social, cog, individual diffs, measurement and outcomes
Legal defensibility
Williamson et al., 1997: structure is better.
Sub grp diffs
Roth et al., 2002: larger than expected, .36-.56, comparable to g
