Hosch Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what subsection is hosch apart of?

A

persuading a jury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what other studies are apart of this subsection?

A

Pennington pickle hosch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what did hosch look into?

A

the effect of the expert witness on jury perception of eyewitness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what background points can be used?

A

juries place a lot of value on ewt

expert witnesses can be bought in to argue the unreliability and to not place an etire decision on it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the aim of the study?

A

to determine the influence of expert testimony regarding the general unreliability of eyewitnesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what was the procedure?

A

a two- phase study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what happened in the phase 1 ?

A

a burglary case was tried. two juries heard all the evidence including expert testimony of a psychologist , the other two heard all testimony except that of psychologist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

who were the participants of the phase 1?

A

24 community residents served at four six person juries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

who was the psychologist?

A

was a defence expert talking about the potential unreliability of eye witness memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

who were the participants in phase 2 ?

A

24 student jurors consisting of four 6 person jurors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what happened in the second phase?

A

juries saw a videotape of the trial , two juries saw the entire proceeding from the first phase including expert
remaining two saw all but the expert

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what were the findings ?

A

all juries acquitted the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what was the difference between those who had heard the witness and those who didn’t ?

A

those who heard the expert testimony significantly lowered their judgements of the accuracy and reliability of eyewitness identification as well as its importance to the trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

was their a difference between participants?

A

nope , no difference was obtained

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what was a second difference between juries ?

A

those juries who heard expert witness spent longer time discussing evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is a strength of this study?

A

gives us more of an insight
expert witness can improve the jurors understanding of psychology and make them pay more attention to WIC, if they pay more attention to WIC and spend longer discussing it they are more likely to tell good from bad