Farrington Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are some upbringing factors that could make children turn to crime?

A
poverty in the family 
lack of morals 
crime is a norm in the household
parent commits crime 
living in poorer area 
friends with delinquent behavior
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the aims of farrington ?

A

document the offending behavior from childhood to adulthood in families
to investigate the influence of live events; the risk and protective factors predicting offending and anti-social behavior ; the inter-generation transmission of offending and the influence of family background

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what kind of study was farrington?

A

longitudinal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how many participants were in farrington and what were their age and gender?

A

411 boys aged 8-9

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what were the location, class and race of these boys?

A

east london, white working class males

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what time was this study conducted?

A

1953/4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what age were boys last interviewed?

A

48

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how many were sill alive by the final interview?

A

394

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how many of the interviewees had convictions?

A

161

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what age did offenders peak?

A

17, numbers and offenses increased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what happened to those who committed crime early?

A

if individuals started criminal careers between the ages of (10-13) 91% were re-convicted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what method was used in this study?

A

interviews and questionnaires completed by teachers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what was the average crime from those who started crime from 14-16?

A

6

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how many crimes did these young offenders account for?

A

77% (620 out of 808)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how many individuals said they committed at least 1 crime?

A

93%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is a chronic offender?

A

an individual with a long criminal career , lasted from ages 14-35

17
Q

how many were classed as chronic offenders?

A

7%

18
Q

what characteristics did the chronic offenders have in common ?

A
convicted before the age of 21 
convicted parents
daring 
a delinquent sibling 
young mother 
low popularity 
disrupted family and large family size
19
Q

what are desiters?

A

those who committed crime up to the age of 20 and there were no difference in terms of success from those who had never been convicted

20
Q

what name was given to those who stopped committing crime at the age of 20?

A

desisters

21
Q

what percentage had a convicted mother and a conviction themselves?

A

54%

22
Q

what percentage did not have a convicted mother but had a conviction themselves ?

A

23%

23
Q

what percentage had a convicted farther and a conviction themselves?

A

48%

24
Q

what percentage did not have a convicted farther but a conviction themselves?

A

19%

25
Q

what is one conclusion that cane be drawn?

A

offenders tend to be deviant in all aspects of their life

26
Q

what is a second conclusion that can be drawn?

A

most important risk for criminality in the family are: poverty, impulsiveness, poor child rearing and poor school performance

27
Q

what is a third conclusion that can be drawn?

A

therefore early intervention programmes for under 10s could have significant impact in reducing offending.

28
Q

what are some critiques of this study?

A
lacks females (not representative ) 
doesn't consider biological factors ( reductionist) 
only uses schools in London ( possibly only inner city families) 
runs the risk of attrition as longitudinal
29
Q

what are the positives to this study?

A

able to see development into criminal careers
reliable methods used could be repeated
lots of quantitative data , easy to analyse