1
Q

Inference: What does source A tells me about the issue?

A

source A tells me issue is …. + evidence to support msg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the attitude of the author towards issue?

A

the author is “words indicating attitude” towards issue + msg to support attitude + evidence to support msg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Is the author supportive/for/approve of issue?

A

yes/no, BECAUSE he is “words indicating attitude” towards issue + msg to support attitude + evidence to support msg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

‘Why’ question or any other question that requires purpose

A

BECAUSE author wants audience TO KNOW therefore wants the audience TO DO
Pls do not use the words author and audience - tell us who they are

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Compare contrast / agree disagree

A

similar /difference OR agree/ disagree (MUST ans the question right)
similar/agree: same message
different/disagree: polar opposite message
tone/perspective/purpose : same, polar opposite messages (purpose: outcome same/ polar opposite)

1 similar 1 diff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Reliability / utility

A

As Long as any tool of reliability skill used, pls (M.Cr.A)
M- message of the source must be on the issue IN THE QUESTION
Cr - conclude reliability - therefore source is reliable / not reliable
A - answer the question (read the question and answer accordingly)

Always start with useful information first
source B is useful as it tells me ….
Do any tests of reliability that’s appropriate for the source - (CR)(A)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Utility

A

Always start with useful information first
source B is useful as it tells me ….
Conclude reliability!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Testing assertion reminders 7

A

USE FUCKING CCS

  1. Pls answer yes source __ supports or no, source __ does not supoort
  2. Do not simply identify a method / reason
  3. Explain the method / reason using the source
  4. Link your msg/exp to the relevant CC
  5. Sufficient evidence to support your msg
  6. Always pick the easiest source that you can explain well
  7. If doing bonus marks - pls conclude and tells us how it affects the assertion

1 support 1 challenge
+ 1 support 1 challenge
Must be balanced on both sides

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Does C prove D wrong?

A
  • Always use the 2 sources given first - Use C to check reliability of D. (M.Cr.A).
  • If we are using C to prove D, we better make sure C is right - so use a 3rd source to check C - make sure all 3 sources on same issue - (M.Cr.A) and answer qn
  • Does C have CAP - test, (M.Cr.A) and answer qn again
  • U may use 3rd source for D, whatever u do, answer the qn (always pay attention to C first)
  • This sort of qn usually requires u to read provenance and content carefully for CAP

Work with the 2 given sources FIRST
THEN cross ref
Support C (proves D wrong)
Challenge C (does not prove D wrong)
Support D (proves C wrong)
challenge D (does not prove C wrong)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

more reliable/useful

A

1 source only —> 0m

More reliable
Is A more reliable than B abt —?
A: reliability test (cross ref cannot use B) conclude: A supported by X, A reliable, thus more reliable. (DO NOT COMPARE “THAN B”)
B: reliability test. B is challenged by Y, B is unreliable and thus less reliable.

L3: cross ref x2
L4: CAP x2 (not all have it)

More useful
A message + evd = useful
A: reliability test. Reliable, more useful
B message + evd = useful
B: reliability test. Reliable, more useful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Does B make you surprised at C?

A
  • Always use the 2 sources given to you first, say the same thing, not surprised. Say contrasting things, surprised. Logical connections - can be yes or no
  • Then use 3rd source (eg. Background info) to check C, bring back all sources (C, BI, and B) to answer the qn - all 3 sources must be on same issue
  • Try other methods such as questioned CAP of both sources At the same time to establish if that B makes u surprised at C
    -> Do not conclude reliability !!!

E -same- F -same- X (not surprised)
E -same- F -diff- Y (surprised)
E -diff- F -same- X (not surprised)
E -diff- F -diff- Y (surprised)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

surprise

A

DO NOT conclude reliability, just state if surprised
Cross ref: support- m same , challenge - m opposite

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly