GRE AW template Flashcards
issue template type C
(特定違憲への賛成・反対型)
第一パラグラフ
The speaker claims that —. Basically, I agree with the speaker’s claim insofar as the term — indicates —. The term tends to be interpreted in many different ways such as —; therefore, defining the term is of vital importance in order to avoid rambling discussion. Having defined the term, it is now clear that —. Indeed, if we look around with unprejudiced eyes, we notice that —.
issue template type C (特定違憲への賛成・反対型) 第二、三パラグラフ 主張→反実仮想 反実仮想→主張の発見→主張→例証の示唆
The chief reason for my agreement with the speaker is as follows: —. In other words, — Now if, — not —,— not —.
It must be obvious to anyone’s eye that such —, and if we analyze the —, we realize that —. This is the reason why I insist that —. Let us consider two examples to further verify the assertion.
issue template type C (特定違憲への賛成・反対型) 第六、七パラグラフ 例のまとめ→そもそも論 まとめ
As shown in the two examples above, —. It must be noted that (そもそも論). —. (そもそも論→主張→結果).
In summary, I would like to stress that —. —. Without —, we —. Thus, —.
Issue template type B
(比較型:片方の意見を支持)
第一パラグラフ
Some people contend that — whereas others argue that —. Admittedly, both ideas are equally important, in fact, history inform us that these two examples are mutually exclusive. However, as far as — is concerned, I believe that — is more crucial.
Issue template type B
(比較型:片方の意見を支持)
第二、三パラグラフ
主張→反実仮想
however, 現実
The chief reason for my assertion lies in the —. If we analyze —, we would have a certain level of agreement that —. In such society where (反実仮想), —.
However, (現実). As a matter of fact, can we name anything that —? I cannot name even one as most of us cannot, and this is rather natural because —. Let us clarify this point by using several examples.
Issue template type B
(比較型:片方の意見を支持)
第六、七パラグラフ
In the final analysis, I would like to emphasize that examples above are not oversimplifications. These examples simply manifest the fact that —. Simply put, —. On the contrary, (相手の主張), to which there is no guarantee that (その危険).
As far as — is concerned, I strongly insist that — for the reasons above. This is not to deny the claim that (相手の主張全否定). Om fact, if, — points toward the necessity for —, we must (相手の主張). Yet, it must be noted that, in this case too, — is embraced when and only when it is in agreement with —. In our current society where —, it is important that each — learn the importance of —. Bereft of the —, — can be established.
Argument template 2
第一パラグラフ
At first glance, the claim that — seems reasonable. However this argument not only suffers from logical flaws, but also it bases its conclusion upon several questionable assumptions. Before making the final conclusion, — need to clarify the following points.
Argument template 2
理由1
他の要因、
過去と今同一視パターン
In the first place, the author referred to the report that —. However, — is not taken into consideration in this argument. —. It is obvious that there are many factors that cause —, since the environments of — are not identical, — may be not the same; therefore, it would be misleading to conclude that —.
Argument template 2
理由2
他の要因、様々な属性の違い無視パターン
In the second place, the author pointed out that —. Here, the author is trying to address the differences in — between —, but basing their claim on this point is not credible due to the fact that — is just one of many differences in —. — may be due to other factors such as differences in —. Or it may well be attributable to —. The author must consider this point in order to verify the credibility of the assumption that — play predominate role in —.
Argument template 2
理由4(最後の無理やり、遺伝要因)
Even assuming that —, it is still to hasty to conclude that —. They are genetically different. As scientifically proven, gene determine a large part of human’s mental and physical make up. It is a possibility that — are genetically predisposed to —. If that is the case, a simple alteration of — will not necessarily improve —.
Argument template 2
結論
To bolster the claim the author should provide reliable evidence regarding the points discussed above. One of the things they can do immediately is to investigate —.By studying —, they can minimize the influence of many variables involved in this argument.