Economic theories Flashcards

1
Q

What is the social exchange theory

A

Mutually benefiting relationship
Uses concepts from economics and operant conditioning
We form a relationship if it is rewarding
i like a certain type of reward…collilingus if uk uk
We attempt to maximise our rewards nd minimise our costs
Rewards minus the costs equals the outcome
We commit to the relationship if the outcome is profitable
REWARDS-COST=OUTCOME

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does social exchange theory suggest about rewards, costs and profits

A

Assumes people try to maximise the rewards they obtain from a relationship and minimise the costs
Exchange comes from the assumption that when people receive rewards from others they feel obliged to reciprocate
Rewards and costs are subjective, therefore there is a wide variety of outcomes and these rewards and costs can lose or increase their value as the relationship progresses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Name some rewards part of social exchange theory

A

Companionship
Sex
Praise
Emotional support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Name some costs part of social exchange theory

A

Missed opportunities
Time
Stress
Money

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What id Blau 1964 suggest about economy in relationships

A

Relationships can be expensive - time, cost, energy, stress
agreed, tis not worth it
Opportunity cost can be incurred
Time and energy invested in your relationship means using resources you cannot invest elsewhere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is comparison level (CL)

A

Amount of reward you believe you deserve to get
Based on experiences in previous relationships which feeds into the expectations of our current one
Influenced by social norms - determined within a culture, a reasonable level of reward
CL changes as we acquire more data from experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is comparison level for alternative (CLalt)

A

In your current relationship, you consider
‘Could I gain greater rewards and fewer costs from another relationship or being on my own?’
‘Could I do better?’
SET predicts that we will stay in our current relationship, only as long as we believe it is more rewarding than the alternative
Duck 1994 says there are plenty more fish in the sea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the 4 stages of development

A

Sampling
Bargaining
Commitment
Insitutionalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is sampling as a relationship stage

A

We consider the potential rewards and costs of a relationship and compare it with other relationships available at the time
We do this in non-romantic relationships as well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is bargaining as a relationship stage

A

We give and receive rewards to test whether a deeper relationship is worthwhile
Negotiate what is most profitable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is commitment as a relationship stage

A

The relationship increases in predictability so each partner knows how to elicit rewards from the other, which lower costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is institutionalisation as a relationship stage

A

The relationship norms are developed which establishes the patterns of rewards and costs for each partner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How is inappropriate assumptions that underly SET a -ve evaluation

A

Clark and Mills 2011
Argue SET fails to distinguish between 2 types of relationships
They suggest that exchange relationships such as between work colleagues, does involve social exchange as the SET predicts
Communal relationships don’t keep tabs on rewards and costs
SET claims that reciprocal activities are monitored and weighed up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a -ve evaluation of SET involving direction of cause and effect

A

Argyle (1987) argues that we do not measure costs and rewards in a relationship, nor do we constantly consider the attractiveness of alternatives
Dissatisfaction comes first
Miller (1997) found people who rated themselves as being a highly committed relationship spent less time looking at images of attractive people. Less time spent looking was a predictor of the relationship continuing 2 months later

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How is measurement a difficult SET concept -ve evaluation

A

Difficult to quantify
Rewards and costs are defined superficially in order to measure them
Psychological rewards and costs?

17
Q

+ve evaluation for SET involving abusive and terminating relationships

A

CI-alt helps explain why someone wud end relationship not satisfied with as someone cud offer them more
Can explain why ppl stay in abuse (put a lot in so unlikely to leave)

18
Q
A