Ainsworth's strange situation study Flashcards
Ainsworth
- lab experiment (controlled observation)
- experiment set up in small room so behaviour of infant could be observed
- 100 ppts
- 12-18 months old
- Middle class backgrounds
Strange situation study
- Mom and infant go into room to get used to it before observation begins
- Mom is in room and stranger enters
- Mom leaves and stranger interacts with infant (Ainsworth records stranger/ seperation anxiety)
- Mom returns (reuninon behaviour is recorded) and stranger leaves
- Mom leaves and infant is left alone, a seperation protest is recorded
- Instead of mom, the stranger returns
- Mom re-enters the room and stranger leaves, reuinon behaviour is recorded
Findings from the strange situation study
- 70% of infants had secure attachments (type a)
- 15% of infants had insecure avoidant attachments (type b)
- 15% of infants had insecure resistant attachments (type c)
Types of attachment
- discovered by ainsworth’s study
- secure
- insecure avoidant
- insecure resistant
Secure attachments
type b
* seperation anxiety- some stress experiences when seperated from mum
* stranger anxiety- some stress
* reunion behaviour- easily comforted when mum returned
Insecure avoidant
type a
* seperation anxiety- little/no stress
* stranger anxiety- little stress when stranger approached
* reuinon behaviour- made little contact with mum
Insecure resistant
type c
* sepearation anxiety- intense stress when seperated from mum
* stranger anxiety- extreme fear of stranger
* reuinon behaviour- difficult to comfort, resists contact with mum
Evaluation
+ Supportive evidence
+ Inter-reater reliability
- Differences in culture
-Mixture of different behaviours
-Not an accurate measure of attachment
+ Supportive evidence
- theres support for the concepts covered in the strange situation
- Kokkinis found that infants assessed as secure typically go onto have better outcomes in many areas in adulthood, e.g success in romantic relationships and friendships
- this shows that the concepts discussed by Ainsworth must be valid because it can explain subsequent outcomes
+ Inter-rater reliablilty
- very good inter-rater reliability
- there was more than one reseacher observing the same children in the study and an agreement of more than 94% between their findings
- Differences in culture
- study doesnt take into account cultural differences and cultural bonds in attachment behaviour
- e.g. the study doesnt work in Japan because Japanese mothers are rarely seperated from their babies and as a result there would be very high levels of sepeartion anxiety here
- Mixture of different behaviours
- Soloman argues that a minority of children do not fall within types a,b, or c categories
- they display atypical attachments which he calls ‘disorgansed attachment types’
- this is a mixture of resistant amd avoidant behaviours
- therfore the study is limited/incomplete
- Not an accurate measure of attachment
- some people argue that the study doesnt really measure attachment types, but instead measures reponses to anxiety created by being in an unfamiliar environement
- therefore, the study lacks internal validity