Trials, Hemodynamics, CP Flashcards
PARADIGM-HF Trial:
- Clinical Question
- Bottom Line
- CQ –>
- Among patients with HFrEF, does treatment with an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor reduce CV mortality or HF hospitalizations when compared to ACE inhibitor therapy?
- BL –>
- Among patients with HFrEF, treatment with an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor reduces CV mortality or HF hospitalization when compared to enalapril.
- It is also associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality
PARADIGM-HF TRIAL:
What is neprilysin?
- endopeptidase that breaks down vasoactive peptides (BNP, bradykinin, and adrenomedullin)
- its inhibition may lead to:
- reduced remodeling
- vasoconstriction
- renal sodium retention
- –> improved outcomes in HFrEF
Paradigm-HF TRIAL:
- What was the trial preceding the Paradigm-HF trial?
- What was the major limitation of this trial and the target of the Paradigm-HF trial?
- OVERTURE TRIAL (2002)
- Increased rates of angioedema with omapatrilat (aminopeptidase P + ACE + neprilisyn) –> ARB + NI –> targeting multiple points in the pathophysiologic pathway and reducing angioedema
PARADIGM-HF TRIAL (2014):
- Study design
- Major inclusion criteria
- Major outcome
- Guideline generated from study
- Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF)
- Design:
- Multicenter, prospective, randomized, comparative trial - N = 8,399 with median follow up of 27 months
- Inclusion:
- HFrEF (LVEF <40% and <35% were used at different points in the trial) + NYHA class II-IV symptoms randomized to ARNI vs. ACE.
- Major outcome:
- ARNI had a significant reduction in CV mortality (21.8% vs. 26.5%), all-cause mortality (17% vs. 19.8%), as well as each individual component –> trial stopped early.
- Guideline:
- In patients with NYHA Stage II-III HFrEF tolerating ACE inhibitor or ARB, replacement with ARNI is recommended to improve morbidity and mortality.
What are the aldosterone antagonist trials for HFrEF demonstrate mortality benefit and dictate the guidelines?
- RALES (1999) - spironolactone
- EPHESUS (2003) - eplerenone
**TOPCAT (2014) - spironolactone in HFpEF
What are the BB trials for HFrEF demonstrate mortality benefit and dictate the guidelines?
- MERIT-HF (1999) - metoprolol succinate
- CIBIS-II (1999) - bisoprolol
- COPERNICUS (2002) - carvedilol
- COMET (2003) - carvedilol > metoprolol tartrate
RE-LY Trial:
- Clinical Question
- Bottom Line
CQ –>
- Among individuals with chronic atrial fibrillation, how does dabigatran compare to warfarin in terms of stroke risk and the risk of major bleeding?
BL –>
- Compared to warfarin, high-dose dabigatran (20mg) reduces stroke risk without increasing the risk of major bleeding among patients with atrial fibrillation
RE-LY TRIAL:
What is dabigatran?
- Pradaxa
- Direct Thrombin inhibitor
RE-LY TRIAL:
- Study design
- Major inclusion criteria
- Major outcome
- Guideline generated from study
- Dabigatran vs. warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation - NEJM (2009)
- Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation (RE-LY)
- Design:
- Multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial, N=18,113, median follow up ~ 2 years
- low-dose dabigatran
- high-dose dabigatran
- Warfarin
- Multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial, N=18,113, median follow up ~ 2 years
- Inclusion:
- Nonvalvular A-fib + moderate-high risk of thromboembolic stroke
- Major outcome:
- Reduced incidence of stroke compared with warfarin
- Guideline:
- Approved for storke prevention in A-fib (2014)
What are the two major axes of cardiac hemodynamic assessment?
- Volume status
- “congestion” characterized as elevated LV filling pressure, often measured as elevated PCWP
- Adequacy of perfusion
- characterized by cardiac index
What does assessment of each axes guide in decision making:
- volume status
- adequacy of perfusion
- Volume status
- titration of diuretics
- suitability for, and/or tolerability of BB’s
- Adequacy of perfusion
- need for inotropic agents and advanced therapies (LVAD, transplant)
What are the noninvasive modalities for assessing cardiac hemodynamics?
- H&P
- Biomarkers (BNP)
- CXR
- Impedance cardiography
- Echo
What are the invasive modalities for assessing cardiac hemodynamics?
- RHC
- Implantable monitors
What are the invasive hemodynamic measurements obtained from RHC?
- RA
- RV
- PA
- PCWP (used as index of LV filling pressure and CO)
- CO (via Fick or TD method)
What is the key parameter/measurement obtained in RHC?
PCWP
- correlates well with left atrial pressure –> usually (in the absence of mitral stenosis) is equivalent to LVEDP
When is PCWP obtained during RHC?
after balloon inflation while balloon wedged in PA