The USA Conflict Home and Abroad: 1.3 Flashcards
The Montgomery Bus Boycott and its impact, 1955-60
1
Q
Describe the causes for the one-day WPC boycott of the Montgomery buses on the 5th of December 1955
A
- the discrimination of black people (especially women) on the Montgomery buses
[] white bus drivers took fares at the front of the bus, then made black passengers get off and re-board from the middle to avoid going through the white seating (sometimes they shut the doors and drove off before the black passengers could get back on)
[] white bus drivers were quick to call the police if anyone refused to move for a white person to sit down
[] bullied black passengers - the WPC’s repeated demands for reform from the Montgomery bus company being deliberately ignored since 1950
[] WPC wanted employment of black bus drivers, an end to empty seats (buses weren’t allowed to have mixed-race rows so the bus’ seating was rarely filled yet people still had to stand up), end to having to de-board then re-board the bus every time, and a change in the attitudes of white drivers - Rosa Parks’ (organised) arrest for refusal to move for a white person on the first of December 1955
[] WPC had warned Mayor Gayle of Montgomery and the bus company that they would boycott if another arrest happened
2
Q
Where was Montgomery ?
A
Alabama
3
Q
Why was Rosa Parks chosen to be the face of the WPC one-day boycott ?
A
- was a well-respected middle-aged woman with no history of crime or anything that could be used against her
[] would make white people seem more oppressive for their arrest of her
[] would make it apparent that even the most respectable people in the black community thought that the bus rules and racism should be changed, and it was not just a loud minority - was the secretary of the NAACP Montgomery branch
[] knew how to conduct herself as the face of the boycott
[] knew the importance of publicity
[] had been trained in non-violence
4
Q
What was significant about the WPC boycott on the 5th of December 1955 ?
A
- had 90% engagement from the black community
[] showed that people were willing to support boycotts even if it inconvenienced them
[] showed that black people could organise quickly and that it could be used to do real damage to institutional racism
[] led to the 381 day boycott and the MIA’s creation
5
Q
Who were the MIA ?
A
- Montgomery Improvement Association
- established on the 5th of December 1955, the same day as the WPC bus boycott
[] established in the Holt Street Baptist Church - led by Martin Luther King
[] other important people involved were E.D Nixon, Ralph David Abernathy and Jo Ann Robinson (also the WPC leader) - aims were to improve the lives of the black community in Montgomery and to continue the bus boycott to press for the demands of the WPC
6
Q
Why was Martin Luther King chosen to be the leader of the MIA ?
A
- was new to Montgomery
[] had no friends or enemies amongst the white politicians and people in positions of authority - was a Baptist minister/clergyman
[] meant he was well-respected amongst the black community
[] paid by the black Church, not a white business that could threaten firing him to stop him speaking out for civil rights
[] was a very good speaker on account of being trained to give sermons etc. and captured the hearts of his listeners
[] was able to articulate political ideas in religious terms, which helped to further support of boycotts and campaigns amongst the highly religious black southern community - believed in working WITH white people for progress in civil rights
[] made him popular with white people, which made more people inclined to support his civil rights movement
[] meant that white people felt comfortable being around King instead of hated by him, so white membership of the MIA and later the SCLC was significant - believed in non-violent direct action to make progress in civil rights
[] made him popular as a rational figure for white politicians to negotiate with - well educated, so more likely to be listened to by white people
- greatly understood the importance of publicity for progress in civil rights and centred his campaigns around this
[] toured the USA making speeches to raise money for the MIA’s boycott
7
Q
Describe the events of the MIA boycott
A
- 8 December
[] MIA officials including King met with bus company officials to try and negotiate for the WPC’s earlier demands
[] when the bus company refused, the MIA began the boycott - 12 December
[] MIA knew that some black people were unable to boycott buses due to physical inability to walk/cycle or due to the distance they had to travel everyday
[] because of this, car pools were arranged by the MIA to help these people join the boycott, and they began on the 12th - many black people faced discrimination, harassment and threats from employers during the boycott
[] some were fired, but persisted in the boycott (increased publicity and funding for the MIA) - January 1956
[] WCC membership rose sharply
[] Mayor Gayle and some of his officials joined the WCC in Montgomery
[]harrassment of boycotters on minor charges like speeding increased - 30 January 1956
[] King’s house was bombed by WCC members, with his wife and two-month-old daughter inside
[] was a large, angry black crowd and riot seemed possible - MLK calmed them and reminded them of their belief in non-violence and they listened - February 1 1956
[] NAACP saw the boycott as an opportunity to get buses in Montgomery desegregated (this wasn’t originally part of the WPC’s demands)
[] filed Browder v. Gayle (in the name of Aurelia Browder and four other black women arrested on buses)
[] didn’t use Rosa Parks as her arrest in December may have complicated the case
[] once the case was filed, the MIA held a meeting and agreed to demand desegregation as well - February 22 1956
[] 89 boycotters including King, Jo Ann Robinson, Ralph David Abernathy and E.D Nixon were arrested for “disrupting lawful business” - March 19 1956
[] trial of the 89 boycotters
[] the boycotters brought evidence of the abuse, including murder, inflicted by white bus drivers
[] PUBLICITY AND FUNDING FOR MIA INCREASED
[] King was found guilty and fined $500 - 5th June 1956
[] Supreme Court ruled that buses should be desegregated in Browder v. Gayle case, and gave Brown as the reason - 13th November 1956
[] bus company’s appeal about the Browder v. Gayle verdict failed to overturn the ruling - 17th December 1956
[] bus company’s second appeal about Browder v. Gayle was rejected - 20 December 1956
[] MIA stopped the boycott - 21 December 1956
[] integrated buses began running in Montgomery
[] no further desegregation happened in Montgomery for many years though; even bus stops remained segregated
8
Q
Give the key reasons for the success of the boycott in 1955-56
A
- protesters persisted despite threats, bombing, loss of jobs/bank loans, jailing etc.
[] raised lots of publicity for the cause
[] their outward display of commitment was key in demonstrating just how deeply this issue affected the community - people were very well informed about the dates of the boycotts, car pools, and were kept involved in decision-making through MIA meetings
[] demonstrated the organisation of the black community
[] helped everything to run smoothly - existing groups like the WPC had existing contacts in the press, as well as supporters to back the cause
[] raised publicity for the cause - king’s leadership
[] had widespread support and appeal amongst both black and white people
[] understood the importance of publicity
[] was key in raising funds for the MIA to continue the boycott long-term
9
Q
Who was Jo Ann Robinson ?
A
- leader of the WPC
- important in the MIA
- printed and handed out leaflets informing people about the boycotts with her students
- organised the original boycott
10
Q
Who was E.D Nixon ?
A
- NAACP member
[] had been campaigning for civil rights for years already - lacked the same appeal that King had due to his lack of education and powerful speaking, but was crucial in organising the MIA and funding it
11
Q
Who was Ralph David Abernathy ?
A
- clergyman and NAACP member
- provided most of the organisation during the boycott
- took over as leader of the MIA when King left Montgomery in 1959
- helped King lead the SCLC
12
Q
Who were the SCLC ?
A
- Southern Christian Leadership Council
- headed by King and Abernathy
- aimed to help coordinate church-based protest
[] championed non-violent direct action
[] had broad-based black AND white membership
[] wanted all segregation to be rejected and protested against - set up in January 1957
- first major campaign was in voter registration, to try and have enough black southern people voting in the 1958 and 1960 elections (house of representative seats and presidential elections)
[] worked with black community to train for harsh voter registration tests
13
Q
Give the key areas of importance of the Montgomery Bus Boycott
A
- highlighted the importance of publicity and organisation in orchestrating mass resistance for civil rights
- brought Martin Luther King into the spotlight
[] made him a familiar face who people were attracted to and would willingly support in his later campaigns - especially for white people - demonstrated how black non-violent protest generated massive white backlash and violence
[] non-violent civil rights protesters later exploited this by protesting in areas where a reaction was likely, in order to generate publicity for their own causes
14
Q
Describe the aftermath of the boycott
A
- MIA and WPC achieved their aims of desegregation
- white backlash continued
[] black people riding the bus were shot at
[] the houses of MIA and WPC leaders were bombed
[] WCC members were convicted for bombings but always acquitted by the all-white juries - no further desegregation for years
- prompted a civil rights bill to be proposed in 1957
[] lots of Dixiecrat opposition (Strom Thurmond spoke in a filibuster against it, massively slowing its passing)
[] even President Eisenhower thought that forcing social change would have negative consequences for black people - eventually, it was passed and signed on the 9th of September 1957
[] the Act allowed federal courts to prosecute state violations of voting rights BUT these prosecutions would be tried in state courts
[] the state courts in the south were very likely to have all-white, racist juries, so the Act didn’t really do much
[] demonstrated the shift towards support of civil rights in congress and government, but also the power of opposing racist politicians in slowing progress