Social (& Multicultural) Flashcards
What are Kelley’s 3 types of information with attributions
- Consistency
- Distinctiveness
- Cohesiveness
Is consistency, distinctiveness and cohesiveness (Kelley’s attribution theory) high or low when there’s internal attributions for behaviours?
- Consistency = high
- Distinctiveness = high
- Cohesiveness = low
Is consistency, distinctiveness and cohesiveness (Kelley’s attribution theory) high or low when there’s external attributions for behaviours?
- Consistency = high
- Distinctiveness = high
- Cohesiveness = high
What are 3 results if a person attributes negative events to internal, stable & global causes?
Depression, learned helplessness & hoplessness
fundamental attribution bias/error
attributing OTHER people’s behaviours to internal or dispositional causes - “victim blaming”
Actor-Observer Bias
You attribute your errors to situational/external factors, while you attribute the other person’s errors to dispositional/internal factors
Self-Serving Bias
attribute our own success to internal factors while attributing our own failures to external factors
Availability Heuristic
Estimating the likelihood based on how easily they can recall something
e.g., if people are asked what has a higher rates of death, asthma or firearms, people will say firearms based on the news/publicity when really it’s asthma
Representative Heuristic
Estimation based on typical examples
e.g., people hear “rape” they predict it was a male perpetrator and a female victim
Simulation Heuristic
making mental images of something and then using it to make judgments
e.g., doctor
Kelly’s personal construct theory & what’s the repertory grid technique? (attributions & heuristics)
We perceive the world according to our expectations/what we expect to see
Repertory grid technique: mapping a client’s conceptual model of the world
Balance theory (attitudes)
Balance when all elements are positive (friendship with equal positive views of a politician) or one element is positive while 2 elements are negative (friendship and both have negative views of a politician)
Imbalance is when all elements are negative or one element is negative while the other two are positive
Symmetry Theory (attitudes)
Considers the intensity of the relationship, so if there’s a stronger bond between people with different attitudes, the stronger the motivation will be to change their attitudes
Congruity Theory (attitudes)
Predictions about which attitudes will change depending on the relationship/position a person feels more strongly towards
Cognitive Dissonance (attitudes; Festinger & Carlsmith)
Changing attitudes to reduce the aversive arousal that comes from the inconsistency in their cognitions
Cognitive Dissonance in the Festinger & Carlsmith study
People who got $1 for lying felt more discomfort than the people who got $20, so the people who got $1 changed their attitudes more by giving a higher rating to the task in order to reduce their discomfort
Postdecisional Dissonance (attitudes)
when someone’s faced with 2 good choices so they emphasize the positives of their choice to help their feelings of upsetness of not choosing the alternative
Effort Justification (attitudes)
when they spent a lot of time on something but it didn’t turn out worthwhile then they emphasize the positive qualities from the time spent
e.g., a breakup in a long relationship is reframed as a good learning lesson
Insufficient Justification (attitudes)
When a person performs an undesirable behaviour for a small inducement/result, they emphasize the good qualities of the behaviour
Insufficient Deterrence (attitudes)
When someone doesn’t perform a desirable action because of a small deterrent, then they emphasize the negative aspects of the action
Overjustification Hypothesis
Losing interest/internal motivation in a previously enjoyed activity due to external incentives
Self-verification theory (self-concept)
People are motivated to confirm their self-concept even if it’s negative.
e.g., depressed people will discount positive feedback & seek out feedback that confirms a negative view of themselves
Behavioural confirmation (self-concept) & what does the research say about this theory?
People are motivated to confirm the expectations that others have of us
Research: fails to support it as people actively resist when others have a negative expectation of them
Self-enhancement theory
People are motivated to think favourably of themselves and behave in ways that cause others to see them favorably as well
Sleeper effect (attitude change)
People forget the source of the communication over time but they remember the messaging
What three elements of the source are most influential on unimportant matters?
- likeability
- similarity to the recipient
- attractiveness
What one element of the source is most influential on important matters/deeply held convictions?
Credibility (trustworthiness & expertise)
What’s the primacy effect?
The speaker who spoke first will be remembered best, when there’s a long gap between a speech & a desired action (e.g., election)