Social (& Multicultural) Flashcards

1
Q

What are Kelley’s 3 types of information with attributions

A
  1. Consistency
  2. Distinctiveness
  3. Cohesiveness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Is consistency, distinctiveness and cohesiveness (Kelley’s attribution theory) high or low when there’s internal attributions for behaviours?

A
  1. Consistency = high
  2. Distinctiveness = high
  3. Cohesiveness = low
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Is consistency, distinctiveness and cohesiveness (Kelley’s attribution theory) high or low when there’s external attributions for behaviours?

A
  1. Consistency = high
  2. Distinctiveness = high
  3. Cohesiveness = high
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are 3 results if a person attributes negative events to internal, stable & global causes?

A

Depression, learned helplessness & hoplessness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

fundamental attribution bias/error

A

attributing OTHER people’s behaviours to internal or dispositional causes - “victim blaming”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Actor-Observer Bias

A

You attribute your errors to situational/external factors, while you attribute the other person’s errors to dispositional/internal factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Self-Serving Bias

A

attribute our own success to internal factors while attributing our own failures to external factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Availability Heuristic

A

Estimating the likelihood based on how easily they can recall something
e.g., if people are asked what has a higher rates of death, asthma or firearms, people will say firearms based on the news/publicity when really it’s asthma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Representative Heuristic

A

Estimation based on typical examples
e.g., people hear “rape” they predict it was a male perpetrator and a female victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Simulation Heuristic

A

making mental images of something and then using it to make judgments
e.g., doctor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Kelly’s personal construct theory & what’s the repertory grid technique? (attributions & heuristics)

A

We perceive the world according to our expectations/what we expect to see
Repertory grid technique: mapping a client’s conceptual model of the world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Balance theory (attitudes)

A

Balance when all elements are positive (friendship with equal positive views of a politician) or one element is positive while 2 elements are negative (friendship and both have negative views of a politician)
Imbalance is when all elements are negative or one element is negative while the other two are positive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Symmetry Theory (attitudes)

A

Considers the intensity of the relationship, so if there’s a stronger bond between people with different attitudes, the stronger the motivation will be to change their attitudes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Congruity Theory (attitudes)

A

Predictions about which attitudes will change depending on the relationship/position a person feels more strongly towards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Cognitive Dissonance (attitudes; Festinger & Carlsmith)

A

Changing attitudes to reduce the aversive arousal that comes from the inconsistency in their cognitions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cognitive Dissonance in the Festinger & Carlsmith study

A

People who got $1 for lying felt more discomfort than the people who got $20, so the people who got $1 changed their attitudes more by giving a higher rating to the task in order to reduce their discomfort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Postdecisional Dissonance (attitudes)

A

when someone’s faced with 2 good choices so they emphasize the positives of their choice to help their feelings of upsetness of not choosing the alternative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Effort Justification (attitudes)

A

when they spent a lot of time on something but it didn’t turn out worthwhile then they emphasize the positive qualities from the time spent
e.g., a breakup in a long relationship is reframed as a good learning lesson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Insufficient Justification (attitudes)

A

When a person performs an undesirable behaviour for a small inducement/result, they emphasize the good qualities of the behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Insufficient Deterrence (attitudes)

A

When someone doesn’t perform a desirable action because of a small deterrent, then they emphasize the negative aspects of the action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Overjustification Hypothesis

A

Losing interest/internal motivation in a previously enjoyed activity due to external incentives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Self-verification theory (self-concept)

A

People are motivated to confirm their self-concept even if it’s negative.
e.g., depressed people will discount positive feedback & seek out feedback that confirms a negative view of themselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Behavioural confirmation (self-concept) & what does the research say about this theory?

A

People are motivated to confirm the expectations that others have of us
Research: fails to support it as people actively resist when others have a negative expectation of them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Self-enhancement theory

A

People are motivated to think favourably of themselves and behave in ways that cause others to see them favorably as well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Sleeper effect (attitude change)

A

People forget the source of the communication over time but they remember the messaging

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What three elements of the source are most influential on unimportant matters?

A
  1. likeability
  2. similarity to the recipient
  3. attractiveness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What one element of the source is most influential on important matters/deeply held convictions?

A

Credibility (trustworthiness & expertise)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What’s the primacy effect?

A

The speaker who spoke first will be remembered best, when there’s a long gap between a speech & a desired action (e.g., election)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What’s the recency effect?

A

The speaker who spoke last will be remembered best when there’s a short gap (e.g, the person who spoke last in the televised debate right before the election)

30
Q

What four characteristics of an audience are the easiest to influence?

A
  1. moderate self-esteem
  2. moderate discrepancy in attitude
  3. higher vulnerability
  4. higher involvement with the idea or product
31
Q

Reactance Theory

A

People will not comply with requests or attempts to be persuaded if they feel their freedom is threatened - they regain a sense of control by refusing to comply

32
Q

Peripheral route of persuasion

A

Involves a focus on aspects that are not central to the message like being influenced by the speaker’s attractiveness or their expertise

33
Q

Central route of persuasion

A

involves thinking about the message itself

34
Q

Inoculation & the best way to innoculate people

A

How can we resist or increase a person’s resistance to being persuaded
Best way: when given a mild argument against a belief, you then practice refuting this mild argument so it helps you refute stronger arguments against the belief later
(e.g., how vaccines give you a mild/weak version of a virus so that if exposed to the virus, antibodies will develop to fight it off)

35
Q

Approach-approach conflict

A

A person must choose between two or more favourable alternatives

36
Q

Approach-avoidance conflict

A

A person must choose whether to do one thing that will have desirable AND undesirable results (e.g., a couple choosing if they should have a child)

37
Q

Avoidance-avoidance conflict

A

Person has to choose between two unpleasant alternatives that will lead to negative results no matter which choice is made

38
Q

Learned prejudice (source of prejudice) & most common learned prejudices

A

When a prejudice is learned
Most common: Males are seen as more competent by males & females

39
Q

Cognitive processes (source of prejudice)

A

Making sense of the complex world by creating ingroups and outgroups

40
Q

The most salient personality trait associated with prejudice

A

is authoritarianism

41
Q

How do you combat prejudice?

A

by encouraging cooperation rather than competition

42
Q

What do superordinate goals help with & what are they?

A

They help with prejudice, and they are higher than individual goals & can only be achieved with both groups working together

43
Q

What’s the best measure of reduced prejudice?

A

intergroup relations/interactions

44
Q

James-Lange Theory of emotion

A

Emotions result from perceiving bodily reactions or responses (research overall does not support this theory)

45
Q

Cannon-Bard Theory

A

Emotions and bodily reactions happen at the same time

46
Q

Schacter’s two factor theory

A

Emotions happen from information from two systems: internal (hypothalamus/amygdala) & external (context). Emotion comes from both physiological arousal & cognitive labelling.

47
Q

Social comparison theory states that when no objective standards exist, how to people evaluate their own behaviour?

A

By comparing themselves to others who they perceive as quite similar, a little better or a little worse

48
Q

What are upward vs downward comparisons?

A

upward: comparisons to slightly superior people
downward: comparisons to people who are slightly worse

49
Q

What’s one of the most important factors in our initial liking or loving of others?

A

Our physical attractiveness

50
Q

What’s the matching hypothesis in relation to attraction?

A

that people of approximately equal physical attractiveness are likely to select each other

51
Q

Need complementarity tendency

A

When people choose partners who are different in terms of personality but are similar in values

52
Q

Social exchange theory with attraction

A

How attraction is affected by the costs and benefits of being in a relationship - when costs outweigh rewards, someone becomes less attractive to us

53
Q

Bystander apathy vs diffusion of responsibility

A

Bystander apathy: failing to help a victim when other bystanders are present
Diffusion of responsibility: tendency to assume that someone else will respond & take action

54
Q

What three general factors affect conformity?

A

normative social influence, informational social influence & reference groups

55
Q

Normative social influence

A

Want to be accepted by the group

56
Q

Informational social influence

A

You think the group knows more than you do

57
Q

Reference groups

A

Conform to the people we admire, like and want to resemble

58
Q

Idiosyncrasy credits (conformity)

A

When you’ve conformed to group norms initially, then you earn idiosyncrasy credits that make the group more tolerant of deviations from group norms

59
Q

What, are these key factors involved in (the term)? Persons of authority, placement of responsibility & gradualism

A

Obedience

60
Q

What’s the foot in the door technique with obedience?

A

When a participant’s complied with an initial request & now they feel trapped to continue participating

61
Q

What key factor is involved in reducing obedience?

A

witnessing a disobedient model

62
Q

Additive tasks (group task)

A

All the efforts/different performances are pooled together to get a combined effect/result

63
Q

Disjunctive tasks (group task)

A

the outcome is affected by the performance of the most effective group member

64
Q

Conjunctive tasks (group task)

A

The accomplishment is limited by the performance of the least effective member

65
Q

Deindividuation

A

Losing your identity, adopt the identity of the group and feel anonymous in the process (the soldiers in the show Squid Games)

66
Q

Risky shift (decision making in groups)

A

tendency for people in groups to make riskier decisions than they would on their own

67
Q

Response polarization (decision-making in groups)

A

People become more extreme in their views when in a group

68
Q

Groupthink (decision-making in groups)

A

seeking coherence, consensus & unanimity more than seeking the best alternatives

69
Q

Social facilitation (task performance) & what type of task is it most associated with?

A

the individual task performance is enhanced by the mere presence of others
This happens most when the the task is simple or familiar

70
Q

Social inhibition (task performance) & what type of task is it most associated with?

A

When a task is compromised by the presence of others
This happens most when the task is novel or complex

71
Q

Social loafing (task performance) & when does it most frequently occur?

A

Phenomenon that people don’t work as hard on a task when in a group as compared to when they work alone
This happens most when people perceive that their individual efforts will be anonymous so then won’t be subject to individual evaluation