Reverse Definitions Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

An evaluation of a person, object or odea

A

Attitude

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

And attitude based primarily on peoples emotions and feelings about the attitude object

A

Affectively based attitude

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Attitude based primarily on a persons beliefs about the properties of an attitude object

A

Cognitively based attitude

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

And attitude based primarily on observations of how one behaves towards an attitude object

A

Behaviorally-based attitude

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Attitudes that be consciously endorse and can easily report

A

Explicit attitudes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Attitudes that are involuntary uncontrollable and at times unconscious

A

Implicit Attitudes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

A theory that the best predictors of a person’s planned deliberate behaviours are the person’s attitude toward specific behaviours subjective norms and perceived behavioural control

A

Theory of planned behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Communication advocating a particular side of an issue.

example a speech or television advertisement.

A

Persuasive communication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The study of the conditions under which people are more likely to change their attitudes in response to persuasive messages researchers in this tradition focus on “who said what to whom” That is on the source of the communication the nature of the communication and the nature of the audience

A

Yale attitude change approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The theory that there are two ways in which persuasive communication’s can cause attitude change people either process the merits of the arguments known as systematic process and where are swayed by factors that are preferable to the message. Such as experts are always right known as heuristic processing

A

Heiristic systematic model of persuasion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The theory that there are two ways in which persuasive communication’s can cause added to change the central route occurs when people are motivated and have the ability to pay attention to the arguments in the communication and the peripheral road which occurs when people do not pay attention to the arguments but are instead swayed by surface characteristics such as who gave the speech

A

Elaboration likelihood model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A persuasive message that attempts to change peoples attitudes by arousing their fears

A

Fear arousing communication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Words or pictures that are not consciously perceived that supposedly influence people’s judgements attitudes and behaviours

A

Subliminal messages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The process of making people immune to attempts to change their attitudes by exposing them to small doses of the arguments against their position

A

Attitude inoculation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A feeling of discomfort caused by the realization that one’s behaviour is inconsistent with one’s attitude or that one holds two conflicting attitudes

A

Cognitive dissonance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Dissonance that is inevitably aroused after person makes a decision such dissonance is typically produced by enhancing the attractiveness of the chosen alternative and deevaluating the rejected alternatives

A

Post decisions dissonance

17
Q

The tendency for individuals to increase their liking of something they have worked hard to attain

A

Justification of effort

18
Q

A person’s reason or explanation for dissonant behaviour that resides outside the individual (example to receive a large award or avoid a severe punishment)

A

External justification

19
Q

The reduction of dissonance by changing something about oneself (example one’s attitude or behaviour)

A

Internal justification

20
Q

The process that occurs when a person states an opinion or attitude that runs counter to his or her private believe or attitude

A

Counter attitudinal advocacy

21
Q

The dissonance aroused when individuals lack sufficient external justification for having resisted the desired activity or object usually resulting in individuals devaluing the forbidden activity or object

A

Insufficient punishment

22
Q

Potential for dissonance reduction to produce a succession of self justifications that ultimately result in a chain of stupid or immoral actions

A

Rationalization trap

23
Q

a theory suggesting that people will reduce the impact of a dissonance arousing threat to their self-concept by focussing on and affirming their competence on some dimension unrelated to the threat

A

Self affirmation theory

24
Q

A hostile or negative attitude towards people in a distinguishable group based solely on their membership in that group

A

Prejudice

25
Q

A generalization about a group of people in which identical characteristics are assigned to virtually all members of the group regardless of actual variation among the members

A

Stereotypes

26
Q

Unjustified negative or harmful actions toward a member of a group simply because of his or her membership in that group

A

Discrimination

27
Q

The tendency to evaluate in the group members more positively than outside group members

A

In group bias

28
Q

A persons beliefs regarding the stereotype that out group members hold about their own group

A

Meta-stereotype

29
Q

Our tendency to make dispositional attribution about an entire group of people

A

Ultimate attribution error

30
Q

The theory that limited resources lead to conflict among groups and result in increased prejudice and discrimination

A

Realistic conflict theory

31
Q

A situation in which two or more groups need each other and must depend on each other to accomplish a goal that is important to both groups

A

Mutual interdependence

32
Q

A motivated tendency to see the status quo (the way things are) as the most desirable state of affairs (the way things should be)

A

Injunctification

33
Q

The apprehension experienced by members of a minority group that they might behave in a matter that confirms an existing cultural stereotype

A

Stereotype threat

34
Q

A classroom setting designed to reduce prejudice between children by placing them in small desegregated groups and making each child dependent on the other children in the group to learn the course material and do well in the class

A

Jigsaw classroom

35
Q

A mere knowledge that a member of one’s own group has a close relationship with a member of another group can reduce ones prejudiced toward that group

A

Extended contact hypothesis