ENDGAME Def

Question 1

Justification of effort

Answer 1

The tendency for individuals to increase their liking of something they have worked hard to attain

Question 2

Internal justification

Answer 2

The reduction of dissonance by changing something about oneself example one’s attitude or r

Question 3

Counter attitudinal advocacy

Answer 3

The process that occurs when a person states an opinion or attitude that runs counter to his or her private believe or attitude

Question 4

Rationalization trap

Answer 4

Potential for dissonance reduction to produce a succession of self justification is that ultimately result in a chain of stupid or tomorrow

Question 5

Self affirmation theory

Answer 5

That’s very suggesting that people will reduce the impact of a dissonance arousing threat to their self-concept by focussing on for me in their competence on some dimension unrelated to the threat

Question 6

Injunctification

Answer 6

Motivated tendency to see the status quo (the way things are) as the most desirable state of affairs (the way things should be)

Question 7

The tendency for individuals to increase their liking of something they have worked hard to attain

Answer 7

Justification of effort

Question 8

The process that occurs when a person states an opinion or attitude that runs counter to his or her private believe or attitude

Answer 8

Counter attitudinal advocacy

Question 9

Potential for dissonance reduction to produce a succession of self justifications that ultimately result in a chain of stupid or immoral actions

Answer 9

Rationalization trap

Question 10

a theory suggesting that people will reduce the impact of a dissonance arousing threat to their self-concept by focussing on and affirming their competence on some dimension unrelated to the threat

Answer 10

Self affirmation theory

Question 11

A persons beliefs regarding the stereotype that out group members hold about their own group

Answer 11

Meta-stereotype

Question 12

The theory that limited resources lead to conflict among groups and result in increased prejudice and discrimination

Answer 12

Realistic conflict theory

Question 13

A motivated tendency to see the status quo (the way things are) as the most desirable state of affairs (the way things should be)

Answer 13

Injunctification

Question 14

A mere knowledge that a member of one’s own group has a close relationship with a member of another group can reduce ones prejudiced toward that group

Answer 14

Extended contact hypothesis

Question 15

(self presentation)

• People will behave a certain way to make a good impression and report attitudes in line iwth their behaviour
• attitudes can sometiem follow from behaviour or come from a broader goal

Answer 15

impression management theory

Question 16

(self observation)

• weinfer attitudes from watching our own behaviour
• self observation-just like we infer other peoples attitudes from watching their behaviour
• ifs when your unsure of what your attitude is that your most likley to look at your behavior in order to let you know how you feel

Answer 16

self-perception theory

Question 17

get people to do something they don’t want to dp.
-offer vey little incentive
RESULT: they will change their attitudes in order to justify the unrewarding action

Answer 17

forced compliance paradigm

Question 18

when people think that their freedom is being threatened, they instinstvley want to perseve it by acting in opposition to the freedom threatening source

Answer 18

reactance

Question 19

the racial attitudes of peope who endore themselves as egalitarian values regard themselves as unprejudice but who discriminate in subtle rationalizable ways

Answer 19

adversive racisum

Question 20

most popele know the content of sterotypes and they automatically activate them when they see a target. Some make a effort to ovverride this automatic responce to behave in a non-prejudiced manner

Answer 20

automatic prejudice

Question 21

In game theory and economic theory, it is a mathematical representation of a situation in which each participant’s gain or loss of utility is exactly balanced by the losses or gains of the utility of the other participants.

think of resources as a pie you have to slice up, you want to give yourself the biggest piece.

Answer 21

zero sum perspective

Question 22

reactance

Answer 22

when people think that their freedom is being threatened, they instinstvley want to perseve it by acting in opposition to the freedom threatening source

Question 23

forced compliance paradigm

Answer 23

get people to do something they don’t want to dp.
-offer vey little incentive
RESULT: they will change their attitudes in order to justify the unrewarding action

Question 24

impression management theory

Answer 24

(self presentation)

• People will behave a certain way to make a good impression and report attitudes in line iwth their behaviour
• attitudes can sometiem follow from behaviour or come from a broader goal

Question 25

active faciliation

Answer 25

(they get active help, people are going out of their way to help)

Question 26

passive facilitation

Answer 26

(acting with, convienent cooperation until there’s a threat that creates intergroup tension the nyou won’t get help anymore)

Question 27

passive harm

Answer 27

(interpersonal, avoiding eye contact, being dismissing, avoiding the other person)

Question 28

active harm

Answer 28

(acting against (might have insults bullying, sexual harasment, hate crimes)

Question 29

Interpersonal Discrimination

Answer 29

(less verbally positive/ less time interviewing them/used fewer words).

Question 30

Formal Discrimination

Answer 30

(differences in what employer said about the availability of jobs/received a call back) versus